References
- Arndt S., Laszig R., Aschendorff A., Beck R., Schild C. . 2011. Unilateral deafness and cochlear implantation. Audiological diagnostic evaluation and outcomes. HNO, 59(5), 437–446.
- Colsher P.L. & Wallace R.B. 1989. Data quality and age: Health and psychobehavioral correlates of item nonresponse and inconsistent responses. Journals of Gerontology, 44(2), 45–52.
- Cox R., Hyde M., Gatehouse S., Noble W., Dillon H. . 2000. Optimal outcome measures, research priorities, and international cooperation. Ear Hear, 21, 106S–115S.
- Cox R.M., Gilmore C. & Alexander G.C. 1991. Comparison of two questionnaires for patient-assessed hearing aid benefit. J Am Acad Audiol, 2, 134–145.
- Davis A., Smith P., Ferguson M., Stephens D. & Gianopoulos I. 2007. Acceptability, benefit, and costs of early screening for hearing disability: A study of potential screening tests and models. Health Technology Assessment, 11(42), 1–294.
- Dillon H., James A. & Ginis J. 1997. Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol, 8(1), 27–43.
- Gatehouse S. 1991. The role of non-auditory factors in measured and self-reported disability. Acta Oto-laryngologica, 476 (Suppl.), 249–256.
- Gatehouse S. 1994. Components and determinants of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear, 15(1), 30–49.
- Gatehouse S. 1999. Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile: Derivation and validation of a client-centred outcome measure for hearing aid services J Am Acad Audiol, 10, 80–103.
- Gatehouse S. & Akeroyd M. 2006. Two-eared listening in dynamic situations. Int J Audiol, 45 (Suppl. 1), S120–S124.
- Gatehouse S. & Noble W. 2004. The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol, 43(1), 85–99.
- Heider F. 1958. The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley.
- Jensen N.S., Akeroyd M.A., Noble W. & Naylor G. 2009. The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing scale (SSQ) as a benefit measure. NCRAR Conference: The Ear-Brain System: Approaches to the Study and Treatment of Hearing Loss. Portland, Oregon. (http://www.ihr.mrc.ac.uk/downloads/products/questionnaires/ssq/2009_Portland_Jensen_Akeroyd_Noble_Naylor__SSQb.pdf)
- Noble W. & Gatehouse S. 2004. Interaural asymmetry of hearing loss, Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) disabilities, and handicap. Int J Audiol, 43, 100–114.
- Noble W. & Gatehouse S. 2006. Effects of bilateral versus unilateral hearing aid fitting on abilities measured by the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol, 45(3), 172–181.
- Pichora-Fuller M.K. & Souza P.E. 2003. Effects of aging on auditory processing of speech. Int J Audiol, 42(2), S11–S16.
- Shaver K.G. 1985. The Attribution of Blame: Causality, Responsibility and Blameworthiness. New York: Springer-Verlag.
- Singh G. & Pichora-Fuller M.K. 2010. Older adults” performance on the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ): Test-retest reliability and a comparison of interview and self-administration methods. Int J Audiol, 49, 733–740.
- Stephens S.D.G., Callaghan D.E., Hogan S., Meredith R., Rayment A. . 1990. Hearing disability in people aged 50–65: Effectiveness and acceptability of rehabilitative intervention. British Medical Journal, 300, 508–511.
- van Wieringen A., De Voecht K., Bosman A.J. & Wouters, J. 2011. Functional benefit of the bone-anchored hearing aid with different auditory profiles: Objective and subjective measures. Clin Otolaryngol, 36(2), 114–120.