A meta-analysis to compare speech recognition in noise with bilateral cochlear implants and bimodal stimulation

References

• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. 2009. Steps in the process of evidence-based practice: assessing the evidence [technical report]. Available at: http://www.asha.org/members/ebp/assessing.htm
   Google Scholar
• Bess F.H. 1983. Clinical assessment of speech recognition. In: D.F. Konkle & W.F. Rintelmann (eds.) Principles of Speech Audiometry. Baltimore, USA: University Park Press, pp. 127–202.
   Google Scholar
• Ching T.Y. 2000. Hearing aid benefit for children who switched from the SPEAK to the ACE strategy in their contralateral Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system. AustNZJ Audiol, 22, 123–132.
   Google Scholar
• Ching T.Y. 2005a. The evidence calls for making binaural-bimodal fitting routine. Hear J, 58, 32–40.
   Google Scholar
• Ching T.Y., Hill M., Brew J., Incerti P., Priolo S. . 2005b. The effect of auditory experience on speech perception, localization, and functional performance of children who use a cochlear implant and a hearing aid in opposite ears. Int J Audiol, 44, 677–690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching T.Y., Hill M., Dillon H. & van Wanrooy E. 2004. Fitting and evaluating a hearing aid for recipients of a unilateral cochlear implant: The NAL approach, Part 1. Hearing aid prescription, adjustment, and evaluation. Hear J, 11, 14–58.
   Google Scholar
• Ching T.Y., Psarros C., Hill M., Dillon H. & Incerti P. 2001. Should children who use cochlear implants wear hearing aids in the opposite ear? Ear Hear, 22, 365–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. 1977. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. 1988. The Analysis of Variance. In Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed., pp. 273–406). Hilldale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap W.P., Cortina J.M., Vaslow J.B. & Burke M.J. 1996. Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs. Psychol Meth, 1(2), 170–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn C.C., Tyler R.S. & Witt S.A. 2005. Benefit of wearing a hearing aid on the unimplanted ear in adult users of a cochlear implants. J Speech Hear Res, 48, 668–680.
   Google Scholar
• Fetterman B.L. & Domico E.H. 2002. Speech recognition in background noise of cochlear implant patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 126, 257–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick E.M., Seguin C., Schramm D., Chenier J. & Armstrong S. 2009. Users’ experience of a cochlear implant combined with a hearing aid. Int J Audiol, 48, 172–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvin K.L., Hughes K.C. & Mok M. 2010. Can adolescents and young adults with prelingual hear loss benefit from a second, sequential cochlear implant? Int J Audiol, 49, 368–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvin K.L., Mok M. & Dowell R.C. 2007a. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants. Ear Hear, 28, 470–482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvin K.L., Mok M., Dowell R.C. & Briggs R.J. 2007b. 12-month post-operative results for older children using sequential bilateral implants. Ear Hear, 28, 19S–21S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gantz B.J., Tyler R.S., Rubenstein J.T., Wolaver A., Lowder M.W. . 2002. Binaural cochlear implants placed during the same operation. Otol Neurotol, 23, 169–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gifford R., Dorman M., McKarns S. & Spahr A. 2007. Combined electric and contralateral acoustic hearing: Word and sentence recognition with bimodal hearing. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 50(4), 835–843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins D.B., Prosek R.A., Walden B.E. & Montgomery A.A. 1987. Binaural loudness summation in the hearing impaired. J Speech Hear Res, 30(1), 37–43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hamzavi J., Franz P., Baumgartner W.D. & Gstoettner W. 2001. Hearing performance in noise of cochlear implant patients versus severely-profoundly hearing-impaired patients with hearing aids. Audiol, 40, 26–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hedges L.V. & Olkin I. 1985. Statistical Methods for Meta-analysis. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins J.P.T. & Green S. (eds.). 2006. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 4.2.6 (updated September 2006). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Holt R.F., Kirk K.I., Eisenberg L.S., Martinez A.S. & Campbell W. 2005. Spoken word recognition development in children with residual hearing using cochlear implants and hearing aids in opposite ears. Ear Hear, 26, 82S–91S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter J.E. & Schmidt F.L. 2004. Methods of Meta-analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings. Newbury Park, USA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Iwaki T., Matsushiro N., Mah S., Sato T., Yasuoka E. . 2004. Comparison of speech perception between monaural and binaural hearing in cochlear implant patients. Acta Oto-Laryngol, 124, 358–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston C., Durieus-Smith A., Angus D., O'Connor E. & Fitzpatrick E. 2009. Bilateral paediatric cochlear implants: A critical review. Int J Audiology, 48, 601–617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killion M.C. & Revit L.J. 1987. Insertion gain repeatability versus loudspeaker location. Ear Hear, 8, 68S–73S.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kühn-Inacker H., Shehata-Dieler W., Müller J. & Helms J. 2004. Bilateral cochlear implants: A way to optimize auditory perception abilities in deaf children? Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 68, 1257–1266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laszig R., Aschendorff A., Stecker M., Müller-Deile J. Maune S. . 2004. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: Six-month postoperative results. Otol Neurotol, 25, 958–968.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis M.S., Crandell C.C., Valente M. & Horn J.E. 2004. Speech perception in noise: Directional microphones versus frequency modulation (FM) systems. J Am Acad Audiol, 15, 426–439.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Litovsky R.Y., Johnstone P.M. & Godar S.P. 2006a. Benefits of bilateral cochlear implants and/or hearing aids in children. Int J Audiol, 45, S78–S91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litovsky R.Y., Parkinson A., Arcaroli J., Peters R., Lake J. . 2004. Bilateral cochlear implants in adults and children. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 130, 648–655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litovsky R., Parkinson A., Arcaroli J. & Sammeth C. 2006b. Simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation in adults: A multicenter clinical study. Ear Hear, 27, 714–731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mok M., Grayden D., Dowell R.C. & Lawrence D. 2006. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 49, 338–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mok M., Galvin K., Dowell R. & McKay C. 2010. Speech perception benefits for children with a cochlear implant and a hearing aid in opposite ears and children with bilateral cochlear implants. Audiology and Neurotolgy, 15, 44–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morera C., Manrique M., Ramos A., Garcia-Ibanez L. Cavalle L. . 2005. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: A six month comparative study. Acta Otolaryngol, 125, 596–606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosnier I., Sterkers O., Bebear J., Godey B. & Robier A. 2009. Speech performance and sound localization in a complex noisy environment in bilaterally implanted adult patients. Audiol Neurotol, 14, 106–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller J., Schön F. & Helms J. 2002 Speech understanding in quiet and noise in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40 + cochlear implant system. Ear Hear, 23, 198–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy J., Summerfield A. & Moore D. 2011. Spatial hearing of normally hearing and cochlear implanted children. Int J Ped Otorhinolaryngol, 75, 489–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble W., Tyler R.S., Dunn C.C. & Bhullar N. 2009. Younger- and older-age adults with unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants: Speech and spatial hearing self-ratings and performance. Oto Neurotol, 30(7), 921–929.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Offeciers E., Morera C., Müller J., Huarte A., Shallop J. . 2005. International consensus on bilateral cochlear implants and bimodal stimulation. Acta Otolaryngol, 125, 918–919.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perreau A.E., Tyler R.S., Witt S. & Dunn C. 2007. Selection strategies for binaural and monaural cochlear implantation. Am J Aud, 16, 85–93.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peters B.R. 2006. Rationale for Bilateral Cochlear Implantation in Children and Adults. Part 1 in a 5-part series on binaural hearing and bilateral cochlear implants. Cochlear Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Peters B.R., Litovsky R., Parkinson A. & Lake J. 2007. Importance of age and postimplantation experience on speech perception measures in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants. Otology & Neurology, 28(5), 649–657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyschny V., Landwehr M., Hahn M., Walger M., Wedel H.V. (in press). Bimodal hearing and speech perception with a competing talker. J Speech Lang Hear Res.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsden R., Greenham P., O'Driscoll M., Mawman D., Proops D. . 2005. Evaluation of bilaterally implanted adult subjects with the Nucleus 24 Cochlear Implant System. Otol Neurotol, 26, 988–998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds G.S. & Stevens S.S. 1960. Binaural summation of loudness. J Acoust Soc Am, 32, 1337–1344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricketts T.A., Grantham D.W., Ashmead D.H., Haynes D.S. & Labadie R.F. 2006. Speech recognition for unilateral and bilateral cochlear implant modes in the presence of uncorrelated noise sources. Ear Hear, 27, 763–773.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg M.S., Adams D.C. & Gurevitch J. 1999. MetaWin: Statistical Software for Meta-Analysis. Version 2.0. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Schafer E.C. & Thibodeau L.M. 2004. Speech recognition abilities of adults using cochlear implants interfaced with FM systems. J Am Acad Audiol, 15(10), 678–691.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schafer E.C. & Thibodeau L.M. 2003. Speech recognition performance of children using cochlear implants and FM systems. J Educ Audiol, 11, 15–26.
   Google Scholar
• Schafer E.C. & Thibodeau L.M. 2006. Speech recognition in noise in children with bilateral cochlear implants while listening in bilateral, bimodal input, and FM-system arrangements. Am J Audiol, 15, 114–126.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schafer E.C., Amlani A.M., Seibold A. & Shattuck P.L. 2007. A meta-analytic comparison of binaural benefits between bilateral cochlear implants and bimodal stimulation. J Am Acad Audiol, 18, 762–778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleich P., Nopp P. & D'Haese P. 2004. Head shadow, squelch, and summation effects in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implant. Ear Hear, 25, 197–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senn P., Kompis M., Vischer M.W. & Haeusler R. 2005. Minimum audible angle, just noticeable interaural differences and speech intelligibility with bilateral cochlear implants using clinical speech processors. Audiol Neurootol, 10, 342–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summerfield A.Q., Barton G.R., Toner J., McAnallen C. & Proops D. 2006. Self-reported benefits from successive bilateral cochlear implantation in post-lingually deafened adults: Randomized controlled trial. Int J Audiol, 45, S99–S107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler R.S., Gantz B.J., Rubinstein J.T., Wilson B.S., Parkinson A.J. . 2002a. Three-month results with bilateral cochlear implants. Ear Hear, 23, 80S–89S.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler R.S., Parkinson A.J., Wilson B.S., Witt S., Preece J.P. . 2002b. Patients utilizing a hearing and a cochlear implant: Speech perception and localization. Ear Hear, 23, 98–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullauri A., Crofts H. Wilson K. & Titley S. 2007. Bimodal benefits of cochlear implant and hearing aid (on the non-implanted ear): A pilot study to develop a protocol and a test battery. Cochlear Implants Int, 8, 29–37.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Hoesel R.J. & Tyler R.S. 2003. Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am, 113, 1617–1630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wackym P.A., Runge-Samuelson C.L., Firszt J.B., Alkaf F.M. & Burg L.S. 2007. More challenging speech-perception tasks demonstrate binaural benefit in bilateral cochlear implant users. Ear Hear, 28, 80S–85S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe J., Baker S., Caraway T., Kasulis H., Mears A. . 2007. One-year postactvation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users. Audiol Neurotol, 28, 589–596.
   Google Scholar
• Yuen K., Cao K., Wei C., Luan L. & Li H. 2009. Lexical tone and word recognition in noise of Mandarin-speaking children who use cochlear implants and hearing aids in opposite ears. Cochlear Implants Int, 10, 120–129.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar