Maturational time course of the envelope following response to amplitude-modulated acoustic signals in rats

References

• Aiken S.J. & Picton T.W. 2006. Envelope following responses to natural vowels. Audiol Neurotol, 11, 213–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artieda J., Valencia M., Alegre M., Olaziregi O., Urrestarazu E. . 2004. Potentials evoked by chirp-modulated tones: A new technique to evaluate oscillatory activity in the auditory pathway. Clin Neurophysiol, 115, 699–709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blatchley B.J., Cooper W.A. & Coleman J.R. 1987. Development of auditory brainstem response to tone pip stimuli in the rat. Brain Res, 32, 75–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton M.J., Cohen L.T., Rickards F.W., McNally K.I. & Clark G.M. 1992. Steady-state evoked potentials to amplitude modulated tones in the monkey. Acta Oto-laryngol, 112, 745–751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Church M.W., Williams H.L. & Holloway J.A. 1984. Postnatal development of the brainstem auditory evoked potential and far-field cochlear microphonic in non-sedated rat pups, Brain Res, 316, 23–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dolphin W.F., Chertoff M.E. & Burkard R. 1994. Comparison of the envelope following response in the Mongolian gerbil using two-tone and sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones. J Acoust Soc Am, 96, 2225–2234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisina R.D., Smith R.L. & Chamberlain S.C. 1990. Encoding of amplitude modulation in the gerbil cochlear nucleus: I. A hierarchy of enhancement. Hear Res, 44, 99–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haenggi M., Ypparila H., Hauser K., Caviezel C., Korhonen I. . 2006. The effects of dexmedetomidine/remifentanil and midazolam/remifentanil on auditory-evoked potentials and electroencephalogram at light-to-moderate sedation levels in healthy subjects. Anesth Analg, 103(5), 1163–1169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heil P., Schulze H. & Langner G. 1995. Ontogenetic development of periodicity coding in the inferior colliculus of the Mongolian gerbil. Audit Neurosci, 1, 363–383.
   Google Scholar
• Henley C.M., Owings M.H., Stagner B.B., Martin G.K. & Lonsbury-Martin B.L. 1989. Postnatal development of 2fl-f2 otoacaustic emissions in pigmented rat. Hear Res, 43, 141–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javel E. 1980. Coding of AM tones in the chinchilla auditory nerve: Implications for the pitch of complex tones. J Acoust Soc Am, 68, 133–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John M.S. & Picton T.W. 2000. MASTER: A Windows program for recording multiple auditory steady-state responses. Comput Methods Programs Biomed, 61, 125–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuwada S., Anderson J.S., Batra R., Fitzpatrick D.C., Teissier N. . 2002. Sources of the scalp-recorded amplitude-modulation following response. J Am Acad Audiol, 13, 188–204.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lage-Castellanos A., Martínez-Montes E., Hernández-Cabrera J.A. & Galán L. 2010. False discovery rate and permutation test: An evaluation in ERP data analysis. Stat Med, 29(1), 63–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langner G. 1992. Periodicity coding in the auditory system. Hear Res, 60, 115–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langner G. & Schreiner C.E. 1988. Periodicity coding in the inferior colliculus of the cat. I. Neuronal mechanisms. J Neurophysiol, 60, 1799–1822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makela J.P., Karmos G., Molnar M., Csepe V. & Winkler I. 1990. Steady-state responses from the cat auditory cortex. Hear Res, 45, 41–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meuret P., Backman S.B., Bonhomme V., Plourde G. & Fiset P. 2000. Physostigmine reverses propofol-induced unconsciousness and attenuation of the auditory steady state response and bispectral index in human volunteers. Anesthesiology, 93, 708–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottaviani F., Paludetti G., Grassi S., Draicchio F., Santarelli R.M. . 1990. Auditory steady-state responses in the rabbit. Audiology, 29, 212–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauli-Magnus D., Hoch G., Strenzke N., Anderson S., Jentsch T.J. . 2007. Detection and differentiation of sensorineural hearing loss in mice using auditory steady-state responses and transient auditory brainstem responses. Neuroscience, 149, 673–684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez-Abalo M.C., Savio G., Torres A., Martín V., Rodríguez E. . 2001. Steady state responses to multiple amplitude-modulated tones: An optimized method to test frequency-specific thresholds in hearing-impaired children and normal-hearing subjects. Ear Hear, 22(3), 200–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez-Alcazar M., Nicolas M.J., Valencia M., Alegre M., Iriarte J. . 2008. Chirp-evoked potentials in the awake and anesthetized rat. A procedure to assess changes in cortical oscillatory activity. Exp Neurol, 210, 144–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picton T.W., Durieux-Smith A. & Moran L. 1994. Recording auditory brainstem responses from infants. Int J Pedriat Otorhinolaryngol, 28, 93–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picton T.W., John M.S., Dimitrijevic A. & Purcell D. 2003. Human auditory steady-state responses. Int J Audiol, 42, 177–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plourde G., Baribeau J. & Bonhomme V. 1997. Ketamine increases the amplitude of the 40 Hz auditory steady-state response in humans. Br J Anaesth, 78, 524–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcell D.W. & John M.S. 2010. Evaluating the modulation transfer function of auditory steady state responses in the 65 Hz to 120 Hz range. Ear Hear, 31, 667–678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcell D.W., John M.S., Schneider B.A. & Picton T.W. 2004. Human temporal auditory acuity as assessed by envelope following responses. J Acoust Soc Am, 116(6), 3581–3593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees A. & Moeller A.R. 1983. Responses of neurons in the inferior colliculus of the rat to AM and FM tones. Hear Res, 10(3), 301–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees A.R., Green G.G.G. & Kay R.H. 1986. Steady-state responses to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated sounds recorded in man. Hear Res, 23, 123–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan D. 1989. Human Brain Electrophysiology: Evoked Potentials and Evoked Magnetic Fields in Science and Medicine, New York: Elsevier Science, pp. 70–98, 112–123, 273–275.
   Google Scholar
• Riquelme R., Kuwada S., Filipovic B., Hartung K. & Leonard G. 2006. Optimizing the stimuli to evoke the amplitude modulation following response (AMFR) in neonates. Ear Hear, 27, 104–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rybak L.P., Whitworth C. & Scott V. 1992. Development of endocochlear potential and compound action potential in the rat. Hear Res, 59(2), 189–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryugo D.K., Montey K.L., Wright A.L., Bennett M.L. & Pongstaporn T. 2006. Postnatal development of a large auditory nerve terminal. The endbulb of Held in cats. Hear Res, 216–217, 100–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savio G., Cardenas J., Perez-Abalo M., Gonzalez A. & Valdes J. 2001. The low and high frequency auditory steady-state responses mature at different rates. Audiol Neurotol, 6, 279–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott L.L., Mathews P.J. & Golding N.L. 2005. Posthearing developmental refinement of temporal processing in principal neurons of the medial superior olive. J Neurosci, 25(35), 7887–7895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szalda K. & Burkard R. 2005. The effects of nembutal anesthesia on the auditory steady-state response (ASSR) from the inferior colliculus and auditory cortex of the chinchilla. Hear Res, 203, 32–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viemeister N.F. & Plack C.J. 1993. Time analysis. In: W.A. Yost, A.N. Popper, R.R. Fay (eds.): Human Psychophysics. Springer, pp. 116–154.
   Google Scholar
• Walton J.P., Simon H. & Frisina R.D. 2002. Age-related alterations in the neural coding of envelope periodicities. J Neurophysiol, 88(2), 565–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar