Binaural dichotic presentation to reduce the effects of spectral masking in moderate bilateral sensorineural hearing loss

References

• Algazi V.R., Duda R.O. & Thompson D.W. 2001. The CIPIC HRTF database. Proc. IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics, New Platz, New York, 99–102.
   Google Scholar
• Algazi V.R., Duda R.O., Duraiswami R., Gumerov N.A. & Tang Z. 2002. Approximating the head related transfer functions using simple geometric models of head and torso. J Acoust Soc Am, 112, 2053–2063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ANSI. 1989. Methods for measuring the intelligibility of speech over communication systems. Revised Standards Report ANSI S3.2-1989, New York: American Standards Association.
   Google Scholar
• Apoux F., Crouzet O. & Lorenzi C. 2001. Temporal envelope expansion of speech in noise for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: Effects on identification performance and response times. Hear Res, 153, 123–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arai T., Yasu K. & Hodoshima N. 2004. Effective speech processing for various impaired listeners. Proc 18th Int Congress Acoust. Kyoto, Japan, II, 1389–1392.
   Google Scholar
• Baer T., Moore B.C.J. & Gatehouse S. 1993. Spectral contrast enhancement of speech in noise for listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment: Effects on intelligibility, quality, and response times. J Rehabil Res Dev 30, 49–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best V., Carlile S., Jin C. & Van Schaik A. 2005. The role of high frequencies in source localization. J Acoust Soc Am, 118, 353–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carney A.E. & Nelson D.A. 1983. An analysis of psychophysical tuning curves in normal hearing and pathological ears. J Acoust Soc Am, 73, 268–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhari D.S. & Pandey P.C. 1999. Critical band splitting of speech signal for reducing the effect of spectral masking in bilateral sensorineural hearing impairment. Proc 5th Int Symp Signal Proc and Its Applications (ISSPA 1999), Brisbane, Australia, 119–122.
   Google Scholar
• Cheeran A.N. & Pandey P.C. 2004. Evaluation of speech processing schemes using binaural dichotic presentation to reduce the effect of masking in hearing hearing-impaired listeners. Proc 18th Int Congress Acoustics, Kyoto, Japan, II, 1523–1526.
   Google Scholar
• CIPIC 2001. CIPIC HRTF Database. University of California, Davis, Cal. Available online http://interface.cipic.ucdavis.edu/ CIL_html/CIL_HRTF_database.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen I. 2006. Speech spectral modeling and spectral enhancement based on autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity models. Signal Processing, 86, 698–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon H., Keidser G. & Silberstein H. 2003. Sound quality comparisons of advanced hearing aids. Hearing J, 56, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagan J.L. 1972. Speech Analysis Synthesis and Perception. New York: Springer-Verlag, 277–288.
   Google Scholar
• Gatehouse S. & Gordon J. 1990. Response times to speech stimuli as measures of benefit from amplification. Br J Audiol, 24, 63–68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Giguere C. & Abel S.M. 1993. Sound localization: Effects of reverberation time, speaker array, stimulus frequency, and stimulus rise/decay. J Acoust Soc Am, 94, 769–776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House A.S., Williams C.E., Hecker M.H.L. & Kryter K.D. 1965. Articulation testing methods: Consonantal differentiation with closed-response set. J Acoust Soc Am, 37, 158–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jangamashetti D.S., Cheeran A.N., Kulkarni P.N. & Pandey P.C. 2010. Simulation of increased masking in sensorineural hearing loss for a preliminary evaluation of speech processing schemes. Proc 20th Int Congress on Acoustics, Sydney, Australia, paper no. 980.
   Google Scholar
• Joris P.X., Van de Sande B., Louage D.H. & Vand de Heijden M. 2006. Binaural and cochlear disparities. PNAS, 103, 12917–12922.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreul K.J., Nixon J.C., Kryter K.D., Bell D.W., Lang J.S. . 1968. A proposed clinical test of speech discrimination. J Speech Hearing Res, 11, 536–552.
   Google Scholar
• Kulkarni P.N. 2010. Speech processing for reducing the effects of spectral masking in sensorineural hearing loss. Ph.D. Thesis, Dept. of Elect. Eng., Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay, India.
   Google Scholar
• Kulkarni P.N., Pandey P.C. & Jangamashetti D.S. 2009. Multi-band frequency compression for sensorineural hearing impairment. Proc 16th Int Conf Digital Signal Processing, Santorini, Greece, paper S4P.1.
   Google Scholar
• Kulkarni P.N., Pandey P.C. & Jangamashetti D.S. 2010. Study of perceptual balance for designing comb filters for binaural dichotic presentation. Proc 20th Int Congress on Acoustics, Sydney, Australia, paper no. 556.
   Google Scholar
• Langedijk E.H.A. & Bronkhorst A.W. 2002. Contribution of spectral cues for human sound localization. J Acoust Soc Am, 112, 1583–1596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzi C.S., Gatehouse S. & Lever C. 1999. Sound localization in noise in hearing impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 105, 3454–3463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunner T., Arlinger S. & Hellgren J. 1993. 8-channel digital filter bank for hearing aid use: Preliminary results in monaural, diotic, and dichotic modes. Scand Audiol Suppl, 38, 75–81.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lyregaard P.E. 1982. Frequency selectivity & speech intelligibility in noise. Scand Audiol Suppl, 15, 113–122.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McFadden D. & Pasanen E.G. 1978. Binaural detection at high frequencies with time-delayed waveforms, J Acoust Soc Am, 63, 1120–1131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. 1997. An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing. London, UK: Academic, 66–107.
   Google Scholar
• Murase A., Nakajima F., Sakamoto S., Suzuki Y. & Kawase T. 2004. Effect of sound localization with dichotic-listening hearing aids. Proc 18th Int Congress on Acoustics, Kyoto, Japan, II, 1519–1522.
   Google Scholar
• Nejime Y. & Moore B.C.J. 1997. Simulation of the effect of threshold elevation and loudness recruitment combined with reduced frequency selectivity on the intelligibility of speech in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 102, 603–615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppenheim A.V., Schafer R.W. & Buck J.R. 1999. Discrete-time Signal Processing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 465–507.
   Google Scholar
• Pickett J.M. 1999. The Acoustics of Speech Communication: Fundamentals, Speech Perception Theory, and Technology. Boston, Massachusetts: Allyn Bacon, 289–323.
   Google Scholar
• Proakis J.G. & Manolakis D.G. 1992. Digital Signal Processing: Principles, Algorithms, and Application. New York: Macmillan, 620–662.
   Google Scholar
• Summers V. & Leek M.R. 1997. Intraspeech spread of masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 101, 2866–2876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ter Keurs M., Festen J.M. & Plomp R. 1992. Effect of spectral envelope smearing on speech reception. J Acoust Soc Am, 91, 2872–2880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Par S & Kohlrausch A. 1995. Analytical expressions for the envelope correlation of certain narrow-band stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am, 98, 3157–3169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Bogaert T., Klasen T.J., Moonen M., Van Deun L. & Wouters J. 2006. Horizontal localization with bilateral hearing aids: Without is better than with. J Acoust Soc Am, 119, 515–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villchur E. 1977. Electronic models to simulate the effect of sensory distortions on speech perception by the deaf. J Acoust Soc Am, 62, 665–674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren R.M., Bashford J.R. Jr. & Lenz P.W. 2003. Intelligibility of dual rectangular speech bands: Implications of observations concerning amplitude mismatch and asynchrony. Speech Communication, 40, 551–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wightman F.L. & Kistler D.J. 1992. The dominant role of low frequency interaural time differences in sound localization. J Acoust Soc Am, 91, 1648–1661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo S.D., Boston J.R., Jaroudi A. & Li C.C. 2007. Speech signal modification to increase intelligibility in noisy environment. J Acoust Soc Am, 122, 1138–1149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwicker E. 1961. Subdivision of audible frequency range into critical bands (Freqenzgruppen). J Acoust Soc Am, 33, 248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar