Agreement between psychophysical tuning curves and the threshold equalizing noise test in dead region identification

References

• Baer T., Moore B.C.J. & Kluk K. 2002. Effects of low pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in noise for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am, 112, 3, 1133–1144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonding P. 1979. Frequency selectivity and speech discrimination in sensorineural hearing loss. Scand Audiol, 81, 205–215.
   Google Scholar
• Cairns S., Frith R., Munro K.J. & Moore B.C.J. 2007. Repeatability of the TEN[HL] test for detecting cochlear dead regions. Int J Audiol, 46, 575–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox R.M., Genevieve A.C., Johnson J & Rivera I. 2011. Cochlear dead regions in typical hearing aid candidates: Prevalence and implications for use of high-frequency speech cues. Ear Hear, 32, 3, 339–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehmer R.H. 1959. Masking patterns of tones. J Acoust Soc Am, 31, 1115–1120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasberg B.R. & Moore B.C.J. 1990. Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data. Hear Res, 47, 103–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood D.D. 1990. A cochlear frequency-position function for several species: 29 years later. J Acoust Soc Am, 87, 6, 2592–2605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornsby B.W.Y & Dundas J.A. 2009. Factors affecting outcomes on the TEN(SPL) test in adults with hearing loss. J Am Acad Audiol, 20, 4, 251–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huss M. & Moore B.C.J. 2005. Dead regions and noisiness of pure tones. Int J Audiol, 44, 599–611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO389-8:2004(E) (2004). Acoustics: Reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment. Part 8: Reference equivalent threshold sound pressure levels for pure tones and circumaural earphones. Geneva: ISO.
   Google Scholar
• Kluk K. & Moore B.C.J. 2005. Factors affecting psychophysical tuning curves for hearing-impaired subjects with high-frequency dead regions. Hear Res, 200, 115–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluk K. & Moore B.C.J. 2006. Detecting dead regions using psychophysical tuning curves: A comparison of simultaneous and forward masking. Int J Audiol, 45, 463–476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Poveda E.A., Barrios L.F. & Alves-Pinto A. 2007. Psychophysical estimates of level-dependent best-frequency shifts in the apical region of the human basilar membrane. J Acoust Soc Am, 121, 6, 3646–3654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackersie C.L., Crocker T.L. & Davis R.A. 2004. Limiting high-frequency hearing aid gain in listeners with and without suspected cochlear dead regions. J Am Acad Audiol, 15, 498–507.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malicka A.N. Munro K.J. & Baker R.J. 2010. Diagnosing cochlear dead regions in children. Ear Hear, 31, 2, 238–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markessis E., Nasr-Addine H., Colin C., Hoonhorst I., Collet G. . 2009. Effect of presentation level on diagnosis of dead regions using the threshold equalizing noise test. Int J Audiol, 48, 55–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markessis E., Kapadia S., Munro K.J. & Moore B.C.J. 2006. Modification of the threshold equalising noise (TEN) test for cochlear dead regions for use with steeply sloping high-frequency hearing loss. Int J Audiol, 45, 91–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. 2001. Dead regions in the cochlea: Diagnosis, perceptual consequences, and implications for the fitting of hearing aids. Trends Amplif, 5, 1, 1–34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. 2004. Dead regions in the cochlea: Conceptual foundations, diagnosis, and clinical applications. Ear Hear, 25, 98–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. & Alcántara J.I. 2001. The use of psychophysical tuning curves to explore dead regions in the cochlea. Ear Hear, 22, 268–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Alcántara J.I. & Glasberg B.R. 2002. Behavioural measurement of level-dependent shifts in the vibration pattern on the basilar membrane. Hear Res, 163, 101–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. & Glasberg B.R. 1997. A model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss. Auditory Neuroscience, 3, 289–311.
   Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R. & Stone M.A. 2004. New version of the TEN test with calibrations in dB HL. Ear Hear, 25, 478–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Huss M., Vickers D.A., Glasberg B.R. & Alcántara J.I. 2000. A test for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea. Brit J Audiol, 34, 205–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson D.A. &Fortune T.W. 1991. High-level psychophysical tuning curves: Simultaneous masking with different noise bandwidths. J Speech Hear Res, 34, 2, 374–378.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patterson R.D. & Nimmo-Smith I. 1980. Off-frequency listening and auditory-filter asymmetry. J Acoust Soc Am, 67, 1, 229–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp R. 1965. Detectability thresholds for combination tones. J Acoust Soc Am, 37, 1110–1123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sek A., Alcántara J.I., Moore B.C.J., Kluk K. & Wicher A. 2005. Development of a fast method for determining psychophysical tuning curves. Int J Audiol, 44, 408–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuknecht H.F. &Gacek M.R. 1993. Cochlear pathology in presbycusis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 102, 1–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuknecht H.F. & Woellner R.C. 1953. Hearing losses following partial section of the cochlear nerve. Laryngoscope, 63, 441–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith D.W., Moody D.B., Stebbins W.C. & Norat M.A. 1987. Effects of outer hair cell loss on the frequency selectivity of the patas monkey auditory system. Hear Res, 29, 125–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smoorenburg G.F. 1972a. Audibility region of combination tones. J Acoust Soc Am, 52, 603–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smoorenburg G.F. 1972b. Combination tones and their origin. J Acoust Soc Am, 52, 615–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summers V. 2004. Do tests for cochlear dead regions provide important information for fitting hearing aids? J Acoust Soc Am, 115, 4, 1420–1423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summers V., Molis M.R., Müsch H., Walden B.E., Surr R.K. . 2003. Identifying dead regions in the cochlea: Psychophysical tuning curves and tone detection in threshold-equalizing noise. Ear Hear, 24, 133–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner C.W., Burns E.M. & Nelson D.A. 1983. Pure-tone pitch perception and low-frequency hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am, 73, 966–975.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickers D.A., Moore B.C.J., and Baer T. 2001. Effects of low pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in quiet for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am, 110, 2, 1164–1175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinay & Moore B.C.J. 2007. Prevalence of dead regions in subjects with sensorineural hearing loss. Ear Hear, 28, 231–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogten L.L.M. 1978. Low-level pure-tone masking: A comparison of “tuning curves” obtained with simultaneous and forward masking. J Acoust Soc Am, 63, 5, 1520–1527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegel R.L. & Lane C.E. 1924. The auditory masking of one sound by another and its probable relation to the dynamics of the inner ear. Phys Rev, 23, 266–285.
   Google Scholar