A randomized control trial of interventions in school-aged children with auditory processing disorders

References

• American Academy of Audiology. 2010. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment, and management of children and adults with central auditory processing disorder (CAPD). Available at www.audiology.org/resources/documentlibrary/Pages/CentralAuditoryProcessingDisorder.aspx
   Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. 2005. Central auditory processing: Working Group on Auditory Processing Disorders. Available at www.asha.org/members/deskref-journals/deskref/default, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Amitay S., Irwin A. & Moore D.R. 2006. Discrimination learning induced by training with identical stimuli. Nature Neuroscience, 1446–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aithal V., Yonovitz A. & Aithal S. 2006. Tonal masking level differences in aboriginal children: Implications for binaural interaction, auditory processing disorders and education. Aus NZ J Audiol, 28, 31–40.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop D.V.M., Bishop S.J., Bright P., James C. . 1999a. Different origin of auditory and phonological awareness problems in children with language impairment: Evidence from a twin study. J Speech Hear Res, 42, 155–168.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop D.V.M., Carlyton R.P., Deeks J.M., Bishop S.J. 1999b. Auditory temporal processing impairment: Neither necessary nor sufficient for causing language impairment in children. J Speech Hear Res, 42, 1295–1310.
   Google Scholar
• Blake R., Field B., Foster C., Platt F. & Wertz P. 1991. Effect of FM auditory trainers on attending behaviors of learning-disabled children. Lang Speech Hear SS, 22, 111–114.
   Google Scholar
• Borkowski J.G. & Burke J.E. 1996. Theories, models, and measurements of executive functioning: An information processing perspective. In: G.R. Lyon & N.A. Krasnegor (eds.), Attention, Memory, and Executive Function. Baltimore, USA: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bosnyak D.J., Gander P.E. & Roberts L.E. 2007. Does auditory discrimination training modify representations in both primary and secondary auditory cortex? Into Congress Series, 1300, 25–28.
   Google Scholar
• Brown L., Sherbenou R. & Johnsen S. 1997. Test of Nonverbal Intelligence. Austin, USA: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Cain K., Oakhill J.V., Barnes M.A. & Bryant P.E. 2001. Comprehension skill, inference-making ability, and their relation to knowledge. Memory & Cognition, 29(6), 850–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrow-Woolfolk E. 1999. Comprehensive Assessment of Spoken Language (CASL). Circle Pines, USA: AGS Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Castles A. & Coltheart M. 1993. Varieties of developmental dyslexia. Cognition, 47, 149–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catts H.W., Fey M.E., Tomblin J.B. & Zhang X. 2002. A longitudinal investigation of reading outcomes in children with language impairments. J Speech Hear Res, 45, 1142–1157.
   Google Scholar
• Chermak G.D. & Musiek F.E. 1992. Managing central auditory processing disorder. Am J Audiol, 1, 61–65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chermak G.D. & Musiek F.E. 1997. Central Auditory Processing Disorders: New Perspectives. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Chermak G.D. & Musiek F.E. 2007. (eds.), Handbook of Central Auditory Processing Disorders, Vol. II. Comprehensive Intervention. Oxfordshire, UK: Plural Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (second edition). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Conti-Ramsden G., Durkin K. & Simkin Z. 2010. Language and social factors in the use of cell phone technology by adolescents with and without specific language impairment (SLI). J Speech Lang Hear Res, 53, 196–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conti-Ramsden G., Durkin K. & Walker A.J. 2010. Computer anxiety: A comparison of adolescents with and without a history of specific language impairment (SLI). Computers & Education, 54, 1, 136–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler A. & Foss D.J. 1977. On the role of sentence stress in sentence processing. Lang Speech, 20, 1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawes P. & Bishop D.V.M. 2010. Psychometric profiles of children with auditory processing disorder and children with dyslexia. Downloaded from adc.bmj.com 4/2/ 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Daneman M. & Merikle P. 1996. Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 3, 422–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodd B., Holm A., Orelemans M. & McCormick M. 1996. QUIL: Queensland University Inventory of Literacy. Brisbane: Dept. of Speech Pathology and Audiology, The University of Queensland.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards V.T. & Hogben J.H. 1999. New norms for comparing children's lexical and nonlexical reading: A further look at subtyping dyslexia. Aust J Psychol, 51, 37–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferre J.M. 1998. The M3 Model for Treating CAPD. In: G.M. Masters, N. Stecker, & M. Fey. 1986. Language Intervention with Young Children. Boston: Allen & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Fey M.E., Long S.H. & Cleave P. 1994. Reconsideration of IQ criteria in the definition of specific language impairment. In: R. Watkins, M. Rice (eds.), Specific Language Impairments in Children. Baltimore: Paul H. Brooks Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Fey M.E., Cleave P.L. & Long S.H. 1997. Two models of grammar facilitation in children with language impairments: Phase 2. J Speech Hear Res, 40, 5–19.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber A. (ed.) 1993. Language-related Learning Disabilities: Their Nature and Treatment. Baltimore: Paul H. Brooks Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbard D. 1994. Parental-based intervention with pre-school language delayed children (Study 1). European Journal of Disorders of Communication, 29, 131–150.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gilliam L.B., Loeb D.F., Hoffman L.M., Bohmann T., Champlin C.A. . 2008. The efficacy of Fast ForWord language intervention in school-age children with language impairment: A randomized controlled trial. J Speech Hear Res, 51, 97–119.
   Google Scholar
• Gillion G. 2006. Follow-up study investigating the benefits of phonological awareness intervention for children with spoken language impairment. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 37, 381–400.
   Google Scholar
• Gillion G. & Dodd B. 1995. The effects of training phonological, semantic, syntactic processing skills on spoken language in reading ability. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 26, 58–68.
   Google Scholar
• Goldinger S.D. Pisoni D.B. & Luce P.A. 1996. Speech perception and spoken word recognition: Research and theory. In: N.J. Lass (ed.), Principles of Experimental Phonetics. St Louis: Mosby, pp. 277–327.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes E.A., Warrier C.M., Nicol T.G., Zecker S.G. & Kraus N. 2003. Neural plasticity following auditory training in children with learning problems. Clin Neurophys, 114, 673–684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerger S. 2007. Current state of knowledge: Perceptual processing by children with hearing impairment. Ear Hear, 28, 754–765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston K.N., John A.B., Kreisman N.V., Hall III J.W. & Crandell C.C. 2009. Multiple benefits of personal FM system use by children with auditory processing disorder (APD). Int J Audiol, 48, 371–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamhi A.G. 1998. Trying to make sense of developmental language disorders. Lang Speech Hear SS, 29, 35–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz J. & Harmon C. 1982. Phonemic synthesis: Testing and training. In: R. Keith (ed.). Central Auditory and Language Disorders. Houston: College-Hill Press, pp. 145–157.
   Google Scholar
• Keith R.W. 2000. Random Gap Detection Test. San Antonio: USA: Auditec, St Louis.
   Google Scholar
• Kleeck A.V. Woude J.V. & Hammett L. 2006. Fostering literal and inferential language skills in head start preschoolers with language impairment using scripted book-sharing discussions. Am J Speech Lang Pathol, 15, 85–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kujala T., Karma K., Ceponiene R., Belitz S., Turkkila P. . 2001. Plastic neural changes and reading improvement caused by audiovisual training in reading-impaired children. PNAS, 98, 10509–10514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law J. Garrett Z. Nye C. 2009. Speech and language therapy interventions for children with primary speech and language delay or disorder (review). Cochrane Collaboration. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Loo J.H., Bamiou D.E., Campbell N. & Luxon L.M. 2010. Computer-based auditory training (CBAT): Benefits for children with language- and reading-related learning difficulties. Develop Med Child Neurol, 52, 708–717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahncke H.W. . 2006. Memory enhancement in healthy older adults using a brain plasticity-based training program: A randomized, controlled study. PNAS, 103(33), 12523–12528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madelaine A. & Wheldall K. 2002. Further progress towards a standardised curriculum-based measure of reading: Calibrating a new passage reading test against the New South Wales Basic Skills Test. Ed Psychol, 22, 461–471.
   Google Scholar
• Miller G.A. 1956. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Review, 63, 81–97. [Available at www.musanim.com/miller1956].
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McArthur G.M. & Bishop D.V.M. 2004a. Which people with specific language impairment have auditory processing deficits? Cog Neuropsych, 21, 79–94.
   Google Scholar
• McArthur G.M. & Bishop D.V.M. 2004b. Frequency discrimination deficits in people with specific language impairment: Reliability, validity, and linguistics correlates. J Speech Hear Res, 47, 527–541.
   Google Scholar
• Moore D.R., Halliday L.F. & Amitay S. 2009. Use of auditory learning to manage listening problems in children. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 364(1515), 409–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musiek F.E. 1983. Assessment of central auditory dysfunction: The Dichotic Digits Test revisited. Ear Hear, 4, 79–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musiek F.E. 1994. Frequency (pitch) and duration pattern tests. JAAA, 5, 265–268.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Musiek F. & Schochat E. 1998. Auditory training and central auditory processing disorders. Sem Hear, 9, 357–366.
   Google Scholar
• Ninio A. 1980. Picture-book reading in mother-infants dyads belonging to two sub-groups in Israel. Child Development, 51, 587–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noffsinger D., Wilson R.H. & Musiek F.E. 1994. Department of Veterans Affairs compact disc recording for auditory perceptual assessment: Background and introduction. JAAA, 5, 231–235.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pogorzelski S. & Wheldall K. 2002. Do differences in phonological processing performance predict gains made by older low-progress readers following intensive literacy intervention? Edu Psych, 22, 413–427.
   Google Scholar
• Pokorni J., Worthington C. & Jamison P. 2004. Phonological awareness intervention: Comparison of Fast ForWord, Earobics, and LiPS. J Edu Res, 97, 147–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putter-Katz H., Said L., Feldman I., Miran M. . 2002. Treatment and evaluation indices of auditory processing disorders. Sem Hear, 23, 357–364.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg G.G. 2002. Classroom acoustics and personal FM technology in management of auditory processing disorder. Sem Hear, 23, 309–317.
   Google Scholar
• Richard G.J. 2007. Cognitive-communication and language factors associated with (central) auditory processing disorder: A speech-language pathology perspective. In: F.E. Musiek & G.D. Chermak (eds.), Handbook of (Central) Auditory Processing Disorder: Auditory Neuroscience and Diagnosis (Vol. 1). Oxfordshire, UK: Plural Publishing, pp. 397–415.
   Google Scholar
• Samuel A.J. 1997. Lexical activation produces potent phonemic percepts. Cognitive Psychology, 32, 97–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandford J.A. & Turner A. 1995. Integrated Visual and Auditory Continuous Performance Test. Richmond, USA. Integrated visual and auditory continuous performance test (IVA) school kit unlimited administrations. www.addwarehouse.com/shopsitesc/store/html/integrated-visual-and-auditory-continuous-performance-test. Download date 4/05/2007.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma M., Purdy S.C. & Kelly A.S. 2009. Co-morbidity of auditory processing, language, and reading disorders. J Speech Hear Res, 56, 706–722.
   Google Scholar
• Semel E., Wiig E. & Secord W. 2003. Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals – Fourth Edition (CELF-4). San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Sheehan K.A., Genevieve M., McArthur G.M. & Bishop D.V.M. 2005. Is discrimination training necessary to cause changes in the P2 auditory event-related brain potential to speech sounds?Cog Brain Res, 25, 547–553.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stephenson M. 2007. The effect of classroom sound field amplification and the effectiveness of otoacoustic emission hearing screening in school-age children. New Zealand Health Technology Assessment Technical Brief, 6, 1–60. Downloaded 3 September 2011 from http://nzhta.chmeds.ac.nz/publications/acoustics.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Studdert-Kennedy M. 1980. Speech perception. Lang Speech, 23, 45–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomblin J.B., Records N. & Zhang X. 1996. A system for the diagnosis of specific language impairment in kindergarten children. J Speech Hear Res, 39, 1284–1294.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tremblay K., Kraus N. & McGee T. 1998. The time course of auditory perceptual learning: Neurophysiological changes during speech-sound training. NeuroReport, 16, 3557–3560.
   Google Scholar
• Wiig E.H. 2010. Answering tough questions about CELF-4 interpretation. www.speechandlanguage.com/ask-the-expert/answering-tough-questions-about-celf-4-interpretation [accessed 3rd Sept, 2011].
   Google Scholar