Amplitude and phase-shift effects on dichotic listening performance

References

• Bayazit O., Oniz A., Ozgoren M. & Güntürkün O. 2008. Electrophysiological assessment of brain asymmetry using a dichotic listening paradigm. Yeni Symposium, 46, 130–136.
   Google Scholar
• Bayazit O., Oniz A., Hahn C., Güntürkün O. & Ozgoren M. 2009. Dichotic listening revisited: Trial-by-trial ERP analyses reveal intra- and interhemispheric differences. Neuropsychologia, 47, 536–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlin C.I., Lowe-Bell S.S., Cullen J.K., Thompson C.L. & Strafford M.R. 1972. Is speech ‘special’? Perhaps the temporal lobectomy patient can tell us. Letter to the Editor. J Acoust Soc Am, 52, 702–705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlin C.I., Lowe-Bell S.S., Cullen Jr. J.K., Thompson C.L. 1973. Dichotic speech perception: An interpretation of right-ear advantage and temporal offset effects. J Acoust Soc Am, 53, 699–709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brancucci A., Babiloni C., Babiloni F., Galderisi S., Mucci A. 2004. Inhibition of auditory cortical responses to ipsilateral stimuli during dichotic listening: Evidence from magnetoencephalography. Eur J Neurosci, 19, 2329–2336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryden M. 1963. Ear preference in auditory perception. J Exp Psychol, 65, 103–105.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bryden M. 1988. Correlates of the dichotic listening right-ear effect. Cortex, 24, 313–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Della Penna S., Brancucci A., Babiloni C., Franciotti R., Pizzella V. . 2007. Lateralization of dichotic speech stimuli is based on specific auditory pathway interactions: Neuromagnetic evidence. Cereb Cortex, 17, 2303–2311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabrieli J.D. 2009. Dyslexia: A new synergy between education and cognitive neuroscience. Science, 325, 280–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujiki N., Jousmaki V. & Hari R. 2002. Neuromagnetic responses to frequency-tagged sounds: A new method to follow inputs from each ear to the human auditory cortex during binaural hearing. J Neurosci, 22, RC205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hugdahl K. & Andersson L. 1984. A dichotic listening study of differences in cerebral organization in dextral and sinistral subjects. Cortex, 20, 135–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hugdahl K. & Hammar A. 1997. Test-retest reliability for the consonant-vowel syllables dichotic listening paradigm. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol, 19, 667–675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hugdahl K., Westerhausen R., Alho K., Medvedev S. & Hämäläinen H. 2008. The effect of stimulus intensity on the right ear advantage in dichotic listening. Neurosci Lett, 431, 90–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hugdahl K. 2011. Fifty years of dichotic listening research: Still going and going and… Brain Cognition, 76, 211–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura D. 1967. Functional asymmetry of the brain in dichotic listening. Cortex, 3, 163–168.
   Google Scholar
• Ozgoren M., Erdogan U., Bayazit O., Taslica S. & Oniz A. 2009. Brain asymmetry measurement using EMISU (embedded interactive stimulation unit) in applied brain biophysics. Comput Biol Med, 39, 879–888.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozgoren M., Bayazit O. & Oniz A. 2010. Phase shift effect on dichotic paradigm. Int J Psychophysiol, 77, 293–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrachione T.K., Del Tufo S.N. & Gabrieli J.D. 2011. Human voice recognition depends on language ability. Science, 333(6042), 595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollmann S. 2010. A unified structural-attentional framework for dichotic listening. In: K. Hugdahl & R. Westerhausen (eds.), The Two Halves of the Brain. Information Processing in the Cerebral Hemispheres. Cambridge: The MIT Press, pp. 441–468.
   Google Scholar
• Repp B.H. 1977. Measuring laterality effects in dichotic listening. J Acoust Soc Am, 62, 720–737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studdert-Kennedy M. & Shankweiler D. 1970. Hemispheric specialization for speech perception. J Acoust Soc Am, 48, 579–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallus J., Hugdahl K., Alho K., Medvedev S. & Hämäläinen H. 2007. Interaural intensity difference and ear advantage in listening to dichotic consonant-vowel syllable pairs. Brain Res, 1185, 195–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voyer D. 2003. Reliability and magnitude of perceptual asymmetries in a dichotic word recognition task. Neuropsychol, 17, 393–401.
   Google Scholar
• Westerhausen R. & Hugdahl K. 2008. The corpus callosum in dichotic listening studies of hemispheric asymmetry: A review of clinical and experimental evidence. Neurosci Biobehav R, 32, 1044–1054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerhausen R. & Hugdahl K. 2010. Cognitive control of auditory laterality. In: K. Hugdahl & R. Westerhausen (eds.), The Two Halves of the Brain. Information Processing in the Cerebral Hemispheres. Cambridge: The MIT Press, pp. 469–497.
   Google Scholar
• Wood S., Hiscock M. & Widrig, M. 2000. Selective attention fails to alter the dichotic listening lag effect: Evidence that the lag effect is pre-attentional. Brain Lang, 71, 373–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar