The hidden effect of hearing acuity on speech recall, and compensatory effects of self-paced listening

References

• Alain C., McDonald K.L., Osteroff J.M. & Schneider B. 2004. Aging: A switch from automatic to controlled processing of sounds? Psychol Aging, 19, 125–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amick M.M., Cronin-Golomb A. & Gilmore G.C. 2003. Visual processing of rapidly presented stimuli is normalized in Parkinson's disease when proximal stimulus strength is enhanced. Vis Res, 43, 2827–2835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson R.C. & Pichert J.W. 1978. Recall of previously unrecallable information following a shift in perspective. J Verb Learn Verb Behav, 17, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Arlinger S., Lunner T., Lyxell B. & Pichora-Fuller M.K. 2009. The emergence of cognitive hearing science. Scand J Psychol, 50, 371–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin C.L. & Ash I.K. 2011. Impact of sensory acuity on auditory working memory span in young and older adults. Psychol Aging, 26, 85–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benichov J., Cox L.C., Tun P.A. & Wingfield A. 2012. Word recognition within a linguistic context: Effects of age, hearing acuity, verbal ability, and cognitive function. Ear Hear. 33, 250–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J., MacWhinney B., Flatt M. & Provost, J. 1993. Psyscope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behav Res Methods, 25, 257–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connine C.M., Blasko D.G. & Hall, M. 1991. Effects of subsequent sentence context in auditory word recognition: Temporal and linguistic constraints. J Mem Lang, 30, 234–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox R.M., Alexander G.C. & Gilmore C. 1987. Intelligibility of average talkers in typical listening environments. J Acoust Soc Am, 81, 1598–1608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronin-Golomb A., Gilmore G.C., Neargarder S., Morrison S.R. & Laudate T.M. 2007. Enhanced stimulus strength improves visual cognition in aging and Alzheimer's disease. Cortex, 43, 952–966.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delaney H.D. & Maxwell S.E. 1981. On using analysis of covariance in repeated measures designs. Multivariate Behav Res, 16, 105–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickinson C.V.M. & Rabbitt P.M.A. 1991. Simulated visual impairment: Effects on text comprehension and reading speed. Clin Vis Sci, 6, 301–308.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon R.A., Hultsch D.F. & Hertzog C. 1989 A Manual of 25 Three-tiered Structurally Equivalent Texts For Use in Aging Research. University of Victoria, Department of Psychology, Victoria, Canada. CRGCA Tech. Rep. No. 2.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon R.A., Simon E.W., Nowak C.A. & Hultch D.F. 1982. Text recall in adulthood as a function of information, input modality, and delay interval. J Gerontol, 37, 358–364.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fabry D. 2011. Jim Jerger by the letters. Audiol Today (Jan/Feb), pp. 19–29.
   Google Scholar
• Fallon M., Peelle J.E. & Wingfield A. 2006. Spoken sentence processing in young and older adults modulated by task demands: Evidence from self-paced listening. J Gerontol Psychol Sci, 61B, 310–317.
   Google Scholar
• Fellinger J., Holzinger D., Gerich J. & Goldberg D. 2007. Mental distress and quality of life in the hard of hearing. Acta Psychiatr Scand, 115, 243–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira F., Henderson J.M., Anes M.D., Weeks P.A. & McFarlane M.D. 1996. Effects of lexical frequency and syntactic complexity on spoken-language comprehension: Evidence from the auditory moving window technique. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn, 22, 324–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser S., Gagne J.P., Alepins M. & Dubois P. 2010. Evaluating the effort expended to understand speech in noise using a dual-task paradigm: The effects of providing visual speech cues. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 53, 18–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao X., Stine-Morrow E.A.L., Noh S.R. & Eskew R.T., Jr. 2011. Visual noise disrupts conceptual integration in reading. Psychon Bull Rev, 18, 83–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosjean F. 1980. Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm. Percept Psychophys, 267–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosjean F. 1985. The recognition of words after their acoustic offset: Evidence and implications. Percept Psychophys, 28, 299–310.
   Google Scholar
• Hall J. & Mueller G. 1997. Audiologist Desk Reference. San Diego, USA: Singular.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks C.B. & Tharpe A.M. 2002. Listening effort and fatigue in school-age children with and without hearing loss. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 45, 573–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunnicut S. 1985. Intelligibility versus redundancy: Conditions of dependency. Lang Speech, 28, 47–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman D. 1973. Attention and Effort. Englewood Cliffs, USA: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch W. 1988. The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychol Rev, 95, 163–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch W. & van Dijk T.A. 1978. Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychol Rev, 85, 363–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer S.E., Katelyn T.S., Fasten J.M. & Kuok D.J. 1997. Assessing aspects of auditory handicap by means of pupil dilation. Audiology, 36, 155–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuchinsky S.E., Eckert M.A. & Dub no J.R. 2011. The eyes are the windows to the ears: Pupil size reflects listening effort. Audiol Today, Jan-Feb. pp. 56–59.
   Google Scholar
• Le Prell C.G., Hensley B.N., Campbell K.C.M., Hall J.W. & Guiro K. 2011. Evidence of hearing loss in a ‘normally-hearing’ college-student population. Into J Audiol, 50, S21–S31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman P. 1963. Some effects of semantic and grammatical context on the production and perception of speech. Lang Speech, 6, 172–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblom B., Brownlee S., Davis B. & Moon S.J. 1992. Speech transforms. Speech Comm., 11, 357–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindfield K.C., Wingfield A. & Good glass H. 1999. The contribution of prosody to spoken word recognition. Apple Psycholinguist, 20, 395–405.
   Google Scholar
• Luce P.A. & Pisoni D.B. 1998. Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear Hear, 19, 1–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luce P.A., Pisoni D.B. & Golding S.D. 1990. Similarity neighborhoods of spoken words. In: G.T. Altman (ed.), Cognitive Models of Speech Processing: Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives. Cambridge, USA: MIT Press, pp. 122–147.
   Google Scholar
• Mackersie C.L., Boothroyd A. & Proda T. 2000. Use of a simultaneous sentence perception test to enhance sensitivity to ease of listening. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 43, 675–682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandel R.G. & Johnson N.S. 1984. A developmental analysis of story recall and comprehension in adulthood. J Verb Learn Verb Behav, 23, 643–659.
   Google Scholar
• Mandler J.M. 1978. A code in the node: The use of story schema in retrieval. Discourse Process, 1, 14–35.
   Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson W.D. 1984. Function and process in spoken word recognition. In: H. Bouma & D. Bouwhuis (eds.), Attention and Performance X: Control of Language Processes. Hillsdale, USA: Erlbaum, pp. 125–148.
   Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson W.D. 1990. Activation, competition, and frequency in lexical access. In: G.T.M. Altmann (ed.), Cognitive Models of Speech Processing. Cambridge, USA: MIT Press, pp. 148–172.
   Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson W.D. & Welsh A. 1978. Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cog Psychol, 10, 29–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson W.D. & Zwitserlood P. 1989. Accessing spoken words: The importance of word onsets. J Exp Psychol Human Percept Perform, 15, 576–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoy S.L., Tun P.A., Cox L.C., Colangelo M., Stewart R.A. . 2005. Hearing loss and perceptual effort: Downstream effects on older adults’ memory for speech. Q J Exp Psychol, 58A, 22–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer B.J.F. 1985. Prose analysis: Purposes, procedures, and problems. In: B.K. Britton & J.B. Black (eds.), Understanding Expository Texts. Hillsdale, USA: Erlbaum, pp. 11–65.
   Google Scholar
• Miller P. & Wingfield A. 2010. Distinct effects of perceptual quality on auditory word recognition, memory formation, and recall in a neural model of sequential memory. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience. 4:14. doi:10.3389/fnsys.2010.00014.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morton J. 1969. Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychol Rev, 76, 165–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulrow C.D., Aguilar C., Endicott J.E., Tuley M.R., Velez R. . 1990. Quality-of-life changes and hearing impairment. A randomized trial. Ann Intern Med, 113, 188–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy D.R., Craik F.I.M., Li K.Z.H. & Schneider B.A. 2000. Comparing the effects of aging and background noise on short-term memory performance. Psychol Aging, 15, 323–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picheny M.A., Durlach N.I. & Braida L.D. 1986. Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing II: Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech. J Speech Hear Res, 29, 434–446.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pichora-Fuller M.K. 2003. Cognitive aging and auditory information processing. Int J Audiol, 42, 2S26–2S32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piquado T., Isaacowitz D. & Wingfield A. 2010. Pupillometry as a measure of cognitive effort in younger and older adults. Psychophysiology, 47, 560–569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollack I. & Pickett J.M. 1963. The intelligibility of excerpts from conversation. Lang Speech, 6, 165–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabbitt P.M.A. 1968. Channel capacity, intelligibility and immediate memory. Q J Exp Psychol, 20, 241–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabbitt P.M.A. 1991. Mild hearing loss can cause apparent memory failures which increase with age and reduce with IQ. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl, 476, 167–176.
   Google Scholar
• Rönnberg J. 2003. Cognition in the hearing impaired and deaf as a bridge between signal and dialogue: A framework and a model. Int J Audiol, 42, S68–S76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönnberg J., Danielsson H., Rudner M., Arlinger S., Sternäng O. . 2011. Hearing loss is negatively related to episodic and semantic long-term memory but not to short-term memory. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 54, 705–726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönnberg J., Rudner M., Foo C. & Lunner T. 2008. Cognition counts: A working memory system for ease of language understanding (ELU). Int J Audiol, 42, S99–S105.
   Google Scholar
• Rönnberg J., Rudner M. & Lunner T. 2011. Cognitive hearing science: The legacy of Stuart Gatehouse. Trends Amplif, 20, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Rönnberg J., Rudner M., Lunner T. & Zekveld A.A. 2010. When cognition kicks in: Working memory and speech understanding in noise. Noise Health, 12, 263–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin D.C. 1978. A unit analysis of prose memory. J Verbal Learn Verbal Behav, 17, 599–620.
   Google Scholar
• Sarampalis A., Kalluri S., Edwards B. & Hafter E. 2009. Objective measures of listening effort: Effects of background noise and noise reduction. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 52, 1230–1240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shargorodsky J., Curhan S.G., Curhan G.C. & Eavey R. 2010. Change in prevalence of hearing loss in US adolescents. J Am Med Assoc, 304, 772–778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart R. & Wingfield A. 2009. Hearing loss and cognitive effort in older adults’ report accuracy for verbal materials. J Am Acad Audiol, 20, 147–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stine E.L. & Wingfield A. 1987. Levels upon levels: Predicting age differences in text recall. Experimental Aging Research, 13, 179–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stine E.A.L. & Wingfield A. 1990. The assessment of qualitative age differences in discourse processing. In: T.M. Hess (ed.), Aging and Cognition: Knowledge Organization and Utilization. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 33–92.
   Google Scholar
• Stine E.A.L., Wingfield A. & Myers S.D. 1990. Age differences in processing information from television news: The effects of bisensory augmentation. J Gerontol Psychol Sci, 45, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Stine E.A.L., Wingfield A. & Poon L.W. 1986. How much and how fast: Rapid processing of spoken language in later adulthood. Psychol Aging, 1, 303–311.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Surprenant A.M. 1999. The effect of noise on memory for spoken syllables. Int J Psychol, 34, 328–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surprenant A.M. 2007. Effects of noise on identification and serial recall of nonsense syllables in older and younger adults. Aging Neuropsychol Cogn, 14, 126–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titchener E.B. 1908. Lectures on the Elementary Psychology of Feeling and Attention. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Titone D., Prentice K.J. & Wingfield A. 2000. Resource allocation during spoken discourse processing: Effects of age and passage difficulty as revealed by self-paced listening. Mem Cogn, 28, 1029–1040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tun P.A., McCoy S. & Wingfield A. 2009. Aging, hearing acuity, and the attentional costs of effortful listening. Psychol Aging, 24, 761–766.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner A. & Greene F. 1978. Construction and use of a propositional text base. JSAS: Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 8, 3 (ms. no. 1713).
   Google Scholar
• Tyler L. 1984. The structure of the initial cohort: Evidence from gating. Percept Psychophys, 36, 417–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk T.A. & Kintsch W. 1983. Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. San Diego, USA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Hooren S.A.H., Anteunis L.J.C., Valentijn S.A.M., Bosma H., Ponds R.W.H.M. . 2005. Does cognitive function in older adults with hearing impairment improve by hearing aid use? Int J Audiol, 44, 265–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters G.S. & Caplan D. 2001. Age, working memory, and on-line syntactic processing in sentence comprehension. Psychol Aging, 16, 128–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wayland S.C., Wingfield A. & Goodglass H. 1989. Recognition of isolated words: The dynamics of cohort reduction. Appl Psycholinguist, 10, 475–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. 1997. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (3rd edition), San Antonio, USA: The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Widen S.E., Holmes A.E., Johnson T., Bohlin M. & Erlandsson S.I. 2009. Hearing, use of hearing protection, and attitudes towards noise among young American adults. Int J Audiol, 48, 537–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingfield A. 1996. Cognitive factors in auditory performance: Context, speed of processing and constraints of memory. J Am Acad Audiol, 7, 175–182.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wingfield A., Alexander A.H. & Cavigelli S. 1994. Does memory constrain utilization of top-down information in spoken word recognition? Evidence from normal aging. Lang Speech, 37, 221–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingfield A., Goodglass H. & Lindfield K.C. 1997. Word recognition from acoustic onsets and acoustic offsets: Effects of cohort size and syllabic stress. Appl Psycholinguist, 18, 85–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingfield A., McCoy S.L., Peelle J.E., Tun P.A. & Cox L.C. 2006. Effects of adult aging and hearing loss on comprehension of rapid speech varying in syntactic complexity. J Am Acad Audiol, 17, 487–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingfield A., Tun P.A. & McCoy S.L. 2005. Hearing loss in adulthood: What it is and how it interacts with cognitive performance. Curr Dir Psychol Sci, 14, 144–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingfield A., Tun P.A., McCoy S.L., Stewart R.A. & Cox L.C. 2006. Sensory and cognitive constraints in comprehension of spoken language in adult aging. Sem Hear, 27, 273–283.
   Google Scholar
• Zekveld A., Kramer S.E. & Festen J.M. 2010. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: The influence of sentence intelligibility. Ear Hear, 31, 480–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelinski E.M., Light L.L. & Gilewski M.J. 1984. Adult age differences in memory for prose: The question of sensitivity to passage structure. Devel Psychol, 20, 1181–1192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar