Acceptable noise level (ANL) with Danish and non-semantic speech materials in adult hearing-aid users

References

• Adams E.M., Gordon-Hickey S., Moore R.E. & Morlas H. 2010. Effects of reverberation on acceptable noise level measurements in younger and older adults. Int J Audiol, 9, 832–8.
   Google Scholar
• Altman D.G. 1991. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen J.R. 1983. Samsø Rundt. Tranebjerg, Denmark: Flemming Andersens Bookstore.
   Google Scholar
• Beaton D.E., Boers M. & Wells G.A. 2002. Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): A literature review and directions for future research. Curr Opin Rheumatol, 14, 109–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilger R.C., Nuetzel J.M., Rabinowitz W.M. & Rzeczkowski C. 1984. Standardization of a test of speech perception in noise. J Speech Hear Res, 27, 32–48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bland J.M. & Altman D.G. 1986. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet, 327, 307–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brännström K.J., Lantz J., Nielsen L.H. & Olsen S.Ø. 2012. Acceptable noise level with Danish, Swedish and non-semantic speech materials. Int J Audiol, 51, 146–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brännström J. & Wennerström I. 2010. Hearing aid fitting outcome: Clinical application and psychometric properties of a Swedish translation of the international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA). J Am Acad Audiol, 21, 512–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne D., Dillon H., Tran K., Arlinger S., Wilbraham K. . 1994. An international comparison of long-term average speech spectra. J Acoust Soc Am, 96, 2108–2120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook J.A. & Hawkins D.B. 2007. Outcome measurement for patients receiving hearing aid services. Laryngoscope, 117, 610–613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox R.M. & Alexander G.C. 2002. The international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA): Psychometric properties of the English version. Int J Audiol, 41, 30–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox R., Hyde M., Gatehouse S., Noble W., Dillon H. . 2000. Optimal outcome measures, research priorities, and international cooperation. Ear Hear, 21, 106S–115S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox R.M., Stephens D. & Kramer S.E. 2002. Translations of the international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA). Int J Audiol, 41, 3–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elberling C., Ludvigsen C. & Lyregaard P.E. 1989. DANTALE: A new Danish speech material. Scand Audiol, 18, 169–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin C.A., Thelin J.W., Nabelek A.K. & Burchfield S.B. 2006. The effect of speech presentation level on acceptance of background noise in listeners with normal hearing. J Am Acad Audiol, 17, 141–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freyaldenhoven M.C., Nabelek A.K., Burchfield S.B. & Thelin J.W. 2005a. Acceptable noise level as a measure of directional benefit. J Am Acad Audiol, 16, 228–236.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Freyaldenhoven M.C., Nabelek A.K. & Tampas J.W. 2008a. Relationship between acceptable noise level and the abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 51, 136–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freyaldenhoven M.C., Plyler P.N., Thelin J.W. & Burchfield S.B. 2006b. Acceptance of noise with monaural and binaural amplification. J Am Acad Audiol, 17, 659–666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freyaldenhoven M.C., Plyler P.N., Thelin J.W. & Hedrick M.S. 2007. The effects of speech presentation level on acceptance of noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 50, 878–885.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freyaldenhoven M.C., Plyler P.N., Thelin J.W. & Muenchen R.A. 2008b. Acceptance of noise growth patterns in hearing aid users. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 51, 126–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freyaldenhoven M.C., Smiley D.F., Muenchen R.A. & Konrad T.N. 2006a. Acceptable noise level: Reliability measures and comparison to preference for background sounds. J Am Acad Audiol, 17, 640–648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freyaldenhoven M.F., Thelin J.W., Plyler P.N., Nabelek A.K. & Burchfield S.B. 2005b. Effect of stimulant medication on the acceptance of background noise in individuals with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Am Acad Audiol, 16, 677–686.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gordon-Hickey S. & Moore R.E. 2008. Acceptance of noise with intelligible, reversed, and unfamiliar primary discourse. Am J Audiol, 17, 129–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harkrider A.W. & Smith S.B. 2005. Acceptable noise level, phoneme recognition in noise, and measures of auditory efferent activity. J Am Acad Audiol, 16, 530–545.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harkrider A.W. & Tampas J.W. 2006. Differences in responses from the cochleae and central nervous systems of females with low versus high acceptable noise levels. J Am Acad Audiol, 17, 667–676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heuermann H., Kinkel M. & Tchorz J. 2005. Comparison of psychometric properties of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA) in various studies. Int J Audiol, 44, 102–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickson L., Clutterbuck S. & Khan A. 2010. Factors associated with hearing aid fitting outcomes on the IOI-HA. Int J Audiol, 49, 586–595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holube I., Fredelake S., Vlaming M. & Kollmeier B. 2010. Development and analysis of an International Speech Test Signal (ISTS). Int J Audiol, 49, 891–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humes L.E., Wilson D.L., Barlow N.N. & Garner C. 2002. Changes in hearing-aid benefit following 1 or 2 years of hearing-aid use by older adults. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 45, 772–782.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEC 60318 - 2. 1998. Electroacoustics - Simulators of human head and ear - Part 2: An interim acoustic coupler for the calibration of audiometric earphones in the extended high-frequency range. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 389 - 5. 2006. Acoustics: Reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment. Part 5: Reference equivalent threshold sound pressure levels for pure tones in the frequency range 8000 Hz to 16000 Hz. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 389 - 8. 2004. Acoustics: Reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment. Part 8: Reference equivalent threshold sound pressure levels for pure tones and circumaural earphones. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 8253 - 1. 1998. Acoustics: Audiometric test methods part 1: Basic pure tone air and bone conduction threshold audiometry. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization
   Google Scholar
• Jespersen C.T., Bille M., Groth J. & Hansen T. 2005. Danish reference data for the IOI-HA questionnaire. In: A.N. Rasmussen, T. Poulsen, T. Andersen, C.B. Larsen (eds.), 21st Danavox Symposium 2005 on Hearing Aid Fitting. Denmark: Centertryk, 475–492.
   Google Scholar
• Kim J.S. & Bryan M.F. 2011. The effects of asymmetric directional microphone fittings on acceptance of background noise. Int J Audiol, 50, 290–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer S.E., Allessie G.H., Dondorp A.W., Zekveld A.A. & Kapteyn T.S. 2005. A home education program for older adults with hearing impairment and their significant others: A randomized trial evaluating short- and long-term effects. Int J Audiol, 44, 255–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer S.E., Goverts S.T., Dreschler W.A., Boymans M. & Festen J.M. 2002. International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): Results from The Netherlands. Int J Audiol, 41, 36–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson V.D., Williams D.W., Henderson W.G., Luethke L.E., Beck L.B. . 2002. A multi-center, double blind clinical trial comparing benefit from three commonly used hearing aid circuits. Ear Hear, 23, 269–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H., Zhang H., Liu S., Chen X., Han D. . 2011. International outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA): Results from the Chinese version. Int J Audiol, 50, 673–678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolis R.H. & Goycoolea H.G. 1993. Multifrequency tympanometry in normal adults. Ear Hear, 14, 408–413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meister H., Lausberg I., Kiessling J., von Wedel H. & Walger M. 2005. Detecting components of hearing aid fitting using a self-assessment-inventory. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 262, 580–586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metselaar M., Maat B., Krijnen P., Verschuure H., Dreschler W.A. . 2009. Self-reported disability and handicap after hearing-aid fitting and benefit of hearing aids: Comparison of fitting procedures, degree of hearing loss, experience with hearing aids and uni- and bilateral fittings. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 266, 907–917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore R., Gordon-Hickey S. & Jones A. 2011. Most comfortable listening levels, background noise levels, and acceptable noise levels for children and adults with normal hearing. J Am Acad Audiol, 22, 286–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller H.G., Weber J. & Hornsby B.W. 2006. The effects of digital noise reduction on the acceptance of background noise. Trends Amplif, 10, 83–93.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nabelek A.K., Freyaldenhoven M.C., Tampas J.W., Burchfiel S.B. & Muenchen R.A. 2006. Acceptable noise level as a predictor of hearing aid use. J Am Acad Audiol, 17, 626–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabelek A.K., Tampas J.W. & Burchfield S.B. 2004. Comparison of speech perception in background noise with acceptance of background noise in aided and unaided conditions. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 47, 1001–1011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabelek A.K., Tampas J.W. & Freyaldenhoven M.C. 2007. Further questions about the acceptable noise level test: A response to Dr. Hamill. J Am Acad Audiol, 18, 185–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabelek A.K., Tucker F.M. & Letowski T.R. 1991. Toleration of background noises: Relationship with patterns of hearing aid use by elderly persons. J Speech Hear Res, 34, 679–685.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Öberg M., Lunner T. & Andersson G. 2007. Psychometric evaluation of hearing specific self-report measures and their associations with psychosocial and demographic variables. Audiol Med, 5, 188–199.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen S.Ø., Nielsen L.H., Lantz J. & Brännström K.J. 2012. The acceptable noise level: Repeatability with Danish and non-semantic speech materials for adults with normal hearing. Int J Audiol, 51, 557–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plyler P.N., Alworth L.N., Rossini T.P. & Mapes K.E. 2011. Effects of speech signal content and speaker gender on acceptance of noise in listeners with normal hearing. Int J Audiol, 50, 243–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plyler P.N., Madix S.G., Thelin J.W. & Johnston K.W. 2007 Contribution of high-frequency information to the acceptance of background noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing. Am J Audiol, 16, 149–156.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rogers D.S., Harkrider A.W., Burchfield S.B. & Nabelek A.K. 2003. The influence of listener's gender on the acceptance of background noise. J Am Acad Audiol, 14, 372–382.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith S.L., Noe C.M. & Alexander G.C. 2009. Evaluation of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids in a veteran sample. J Am Acad Audiol, 20, 374–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark P. & Hickson L. 2004. Outcomes of hearing aid fitting for older people with hearing impairment and their significant others. Int J Audiol, 43, 390–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens D. 2002. The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA) and its relationship to the Client-Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI). Int J Audiol, 41, 42–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tampas J.W. & Harkrider A.W. 2006. Auditory evoked potentials in females with high and low acceptance of background noise when listening to speech. J Acoust Soc Am, 119, 1548–1561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor B. 2008. The acceptable noise level test as a predictor of real-world hearing aid benefit. Hear J, 61(09), 39–42.
   Google Scholar
• von Hapsburg D. & Bahng J. 2006. Acceptance of background noise levels in bilingual (Korean-English) listeners. J Am Acad Audiol, 17, 649–658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vestergaard M.D. 2006. Self-report outcome in new hearing-aid users: Longitudinal trends and relationships between subjective measures of benefit and satisfaction. Int J Audiol, 45, 382–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar