A randomized controlled comparison of NAL and DSL prescriptions for young children: Hearing-aid characteristics and performance outcomes at three years of age

References

• Australian Bureau of Statistics 2008, Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA) 2006: Technical paper. Brian Pink, Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Benasich A.A. & Brooks-Gunn J. 1996. Maternal attitudes and knowledge of child-rearing: Associations with family and child outcomes. Child Dev, 67, 1186–1205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blamey P.J., Sarant J.Z., Paatsch L.E., Barry J.G., Bow C.P. et al. 2001. Relationships among speech perception, production, language, hearing loss, and age in children with impaired hearing. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 44, 264–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein M.H., Haynes M.O. & Painter K.M. 1998. Sources of child vocabulary competence: A multivariate model. J Child Lang, 25, 367–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brody G.H. & Flor D.L. 1998. Maternal resources, parenting practives, and child competence in rural, single-parent African American families. Child Dev, 69, 803–816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne D. & Ching T.Y.C. 1997. Optimizing amplification for hearing- impaired children: I. Issues and procedures. Australian Journal of Education of the Deaf, 3, 21–28.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne D., Dillon H., Ching T.Y.C., Katsch R. & Keidser G. 2001. NAL-NL1 procedure for fitting nonlinear hearing aids: Characteristics and comparisons with other procedures. J Am Acad Audiol, 12, 37–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ching T., Newall P. & Wigney D. 1996. Frequency response and gain requirements of severely and profoundly hearing-impaired children. The Australian Journal of Audiology, 18, 99–101.
   Google Scholar
• Ching T.Y.C., Crowe K., Martin V., Day J., Mahler N. et al. 2010. Language development and everyday functioning of children with hearing loss assessed at three years of age. Int J Speech Lang Pathol, 12, 124–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching T.Y.C., Dillon H. & Byrne D. 1998. Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: Predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification. J Acoust Soc Am, 103, 1128–1140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching T.Y.C., Dillon H., Lockhart F., van Wanrooy E. & Flax M. 2012. Audibility and speech intelligibility revisited: implications for amplification. In: T. Dau J.C Dalsgaard, M.L Jepsen, T. Poulsen (eds.). International Symposium on Auditory and Audiological Research. Denmark: The Danavox Jubilee Foundation, pp. 11–19
   Google Scholar
• Ching T.Y.C. & Hill M. 2007. The Parent܀s Evaluation of Aural/Oral Performance of Children (PEACH) Scale: Normative data. J Am Acad Audiol,18, 220–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching T.Y.C., Johnson E.E., Hou S. Dillon H., Zhang V. et al. (this issue). A comparison of NAL and DSL prescriptive methods for paediatric hearing-aid fitting: Estimates of loudness and speech intelligibility. Int J Audiol.
   Google Scholar
• Ching T.Y.C., Scollie S.D., Dillon H. & Seewald R. 2010. A cross-over, double- blind comparison of the NAL-NL1 and the DSL v4.1 prescriptions for children with mild to moderately severe hearing loss. Int J Audiol, 49, S4–S15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching T.Y.C., Scollie S.D., Dillon H., Seewald R., Britton L. et al. 2010. Prescribed real-ear and achieved real-life differences in children܀s hearing aids adjusted according to the NAL-NL1 and the DSL v.4.1 prescriptions. Int J Audiol, 49, S16–S25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching T.Y.C., Scollie S.D., Dillon H., Seewald R., Britton L. et al. 2010. Evaluation of the NAL-NL1 and the DSL v.4.1 prescriptions for children: Paired-comparison intelligibility judgments, and functional performance ratings. Int J Audiol, 49, S35–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coninx F., Weichbold V., Tsiakpini L., Autrique E. & Bescond G.E. 2009. Validation of the LittlEARs auditory questionnaire in children with normal hearing. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 73, 1761–1768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon H., Keidser G., Ching T.Y.C., Flax M. & Brewer S. 2011. The NAL-NL2 prescription procedure. Phonak Focus, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Dodd B., Hua Z., Crosbie S., Holm A. & Ozanne A. 2002. Diagnostic Evaluation of Articulation and Phonology. London: Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Dollaghan C.A., Campbell T.F., Paradise J.L., Feldman H.M., Janosky J.E. et al. 1999. Maternal education and measures of early speech and language. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 42, 1432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchesne L., Sutton A. & Bergeron F. 2009. Language achievement in children who received cochlear implants between one and two years of age: Group trends and individual patterns. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ, 14, 465–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn L.M. & Dunn L.M. 1997. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (3rd edition). Circle Pines, USA: American Guidance Services.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn L.M. & Dunn L.M. 2007. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (4th edition). Minneapolis, USA: Pearson Assessments.
   Google Scholar
• Fuligni A.J. 1997. The academic achievement of adolescents from immigrant families: The roles of family background, attitudes, and behavior. Child Dev, 68, 351–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golding M., Pearce W., Seymour J., Cooper A., Ching T. et al. 2007. The relationship between obligatory cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) and functional measures in young infants. J Am Acad Audiol, 18, 117–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haden C.A. 1998. Reminiscing with different children: Relating maternal stylistic consistency and sibling similarity in talk about the past. Dev Psychol, 34, 99–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart B. & Risley T. 1995. Meaningful Differences in Everyday Parenting and Intellectual Development in Young American Children. Baltimore, USA: Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Hoff-Ginsburg E. 1998. The relation of birth order and socioeconomic status to children܀s langauge experience and language development. App Psycholinguist, 19, 603–629.
   Google Scholar
• Ireton H. 2005. Child Development Inventory. Minneapolis: Child Development Review.
   Google Scholar
• Jenstad L.M., Bagatto M.P., Seewald R.C., Scollie S.D., Cornelisse L.E. et al. 2007. Evaluation of the Desired Sensation Level [Input/Output] algorithm for adults with hearing loss: The acceptable range for amplified conversational speech. Ear Hear, 28, 793–811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenstad L.M., Seewald R., Cornelisse L.E. & Shantz J. 1999. Comparison of linear gain and wide dynamic range compression hearing aid circuits: Aided speech perception measures. Ear Hear, 19, 117–126.
   Google Scholar
• Jenstad L.M., Seewald R., Cornelisse L.E. & Shantz J. 2000. Comparison of linear gain and wide dynamic range compression hearing aid circuits: Aided loudness measures. Ear Hear, 21, 32–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson E.E. & Dillon H. 2011. A comparison of gain for adults from generic hearing-aid prescriptive methods: Impacts on predicted loudness, frequency bandwidth, and speech intelligibility. J Am Acad Audiol, 22, 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy C.R., McCann D.C., Campbell M.J., Law C.M., Mullee M. et al. 2006. Language ability after early detection of permanent childhood hearing impairment. N Engl J Med, 354, 2131–2141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King A.M. 2010. The national protocol for paediatric amplification in Australia. Int J Audiol, 49, S64–S69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korver A.M.H., Konings S., Dekker F.W., Beers M., Wever C.C. et al. 2010. Newborn hearing screening vs. later hearing screening and developmental outcomes in children with permanent childhood hearing impairment. J Am Med Assoc, 304, 1701–1708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moodie K.S., Seewald R. & Sinclair S.T. 1994. Procedure for predicting real ear hearing-aid performance in young children. Am J Audiol, 3, 23–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nelson H.D., Nygren P., Walker M. & Panoscha R. 2006. Screening for speech and language delay in preschool children: Systematic evidence review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Pediatrics, 117, e298–e319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pine J.M., Lieven E.V. & Rowland C.F. 1997. Stylistic variation at the ‘single-word’ stage: Relations between maternal speech characteristics and children܀s vocabulary composition and usage. Child Dev, 68, 807–819.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Quar T.K., Ching T.Y.C., Siti Z.S.M. & Newall P. 2012. The parents܀ evaluation of aural/oral performance of children (PEACH) scale in the Malay language: Data of normal-hearing children. Int J Audiol, 51, 326–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilly S., Wake M., Bavin E., Prior M., Williams J. et al. 2007. Predicting language at two years of age: A prospective community study. Pediatrics, 120, e1441–e1449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilly S., Wake M., Ukoumunne O.C., Bavin E., Prior M. et al. 2010. Predicting language outcomes at four years of age: Findings from early language in Victoria study. Pediatrics, 126, e1530–e1537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scollie S., Ching T.Y.C., Seewald R., Dillon H., Britton L. et al. 2010. Evaluation of the NAL-NL1 and DSL v4.1 prescriptions for children: Preference in real world use. Int J Audiol, 49, S49–S63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scollie S., Seewald R., Cornelisse L.E., Moodie S., Bagatto M. et al. 2005. The Desired Sensation Level Multistage Input/Output Algorithm. Trends in Amplification, 9, 159–197.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scollie S., Seewald R., Moodie K.S. & Dekok K. 2000. Preferred listening levels of children who use hearing aids: Comparison to prescriptive targets. J Am Acad Audiol, 11, 230–238.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scollie S.D., Ching T.Y.C., Seewald R.C., Dillon H., Britton L. et al. 2010. Children܀s speech perception and loudness ratings when fitted with hearing aids using the DSL v.4.1 and the NAL-NL1 prescriptions.Int J Audiol, 49, S26–S34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seewald R., Cornelisse L.E. & Ramji K.V. 1997. DSL v4.1 for Windows: A software implementation of the Desired Sensation Level (DSL[i/o]) method for fitting linear gain and wide-dynamic-range compression hearing instruments. Users܀ manual. London, Ontario: University of Western Ontario Hearing Health Care Research Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Seewald R.C., Moodie K.S., Sinclair S.T. & Scollie S.D. 1999. Predictive validity of a procedure for pediatric hearing instrument fitting. Am J Audiol, 8, 10.
   Google Scholar
• Tamis-LeMonda C.S., Chen L.A. & Bornstein M.H. 1998. Mothers܀ knowledge about children܀s play and language development: Short-term stability and interrelations.Dev Psychol,34, 115–124.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wake M., Hughes E.K., Poulakis Z., Collins C. & Rickards F.W. 2004. Outcomes of children with mild-profound congenital hearing loss at 7 to 8 years: A population study. Ear Hear, 25, 1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weichbold V., Anderson I. & D’Haese P.S. 2004. Validation of three adaptations of the Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (MAIS) to German, English and Polish. Int J Audiol, 43, 156–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman-Phillipps S., Osberger M.J. & Robbins J.M. 1998. Infant-Toddler: Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (IT-MAIS). In: W. Eastabrooks (ed.) Cochlear Implants for Kids. Washington DC: AG Bell Association for the Deaf.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman I., Steiner V.G. & Pond R.E. 2002. Preschool Language Scale (4th edition). San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar