The effect of stimulus choice on cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEP): Consideration of speech segment positioning within naturally produced speech

References

• Arnold S. 2007. The Auditory Brainstem Response. In: R.J. Roeser, M. Valente & H. Hosford-Dunn (eds) Audiology Diagnosis: Second Editio. New York: Thieme, pp. 426–442.
   Google Scholar
• Bio-Logic Systems Corporation. 2003. 510(k) Notification for Biologic Insert Earphones. K031352. Mundelein, USA: Bio-Logic Systems Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop D.V.M., Hardiman M., Uwer R. & Von Suchodoletz W. 2007. Maturation of the long-latency auditory ERP: Step function changes at start and end of adolescence. Dev Sci, 10, 565–575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop D.V.M. & McArthur G.M. 2005. Individual differences in auditory processing in specific language impairment: A follow-up study using event-related potentials and behavioural thresholds. Cortex, 41, 327–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkard R. 1984. Sound pressure level measurement and spectral analysis of brief acoustic transients. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 57, 83–91.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cheesman M.F. & Jamieson D.G. 1996. Development, evaluation, and scoring of a nonsense word test suitable for use with speakers of Canadian English. Canadian Acoustics, 24, 3–11.
   Google Scholar
• Cody D.T. & Klass D.W. 1968. Cortical audiometry: Potential pitfalls in testing. Arch Otolaryngol, 88, 396–406.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Florentine M., Fastl H. & Buus S. 1988. Temporal integration in normal hearing, cochlear impairment, and impairment simulated by masking. J Acoust Soc Am, 84, 195–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox A.M., Anderson M., Reid C.,Smith T. & Bishop D.V.M. 2010. Maturation of auditory temporal integration and inhibition assessed with event-related potentials (ERPs). BMC Neurosci, 11, Part no. 49, 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbraith G.C., Amaya E.M., de Rivera J.M.D., Donan N.M., Duong M.T. . 2004. Brain-stem evoked response to forward and reversed speech in humans. Neuroreport, 15, 2057–2060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glista D., Scollie S., Bagatto M., Seewald R., Parsa V. . 2009. Evaluation of nonlinear frequency compression: Clinical outcomes. Int J Audiol, 48, 632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golding M., Pearce W., Seymour J., Cooper A., Ching T. . 2007. The relationship between obligatory cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) and functional measures in young infants. J Am Acad Audiol, 18, 117–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golding M., Purdy S., Sharma M. & Dillon H. 2006. The effect of stimulus duration and inter-stimulus interval on cortical responses in infants. Aust N Z J Audiol, 28, 122–136.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein M.H. & Kiang N.Y.S. 1958. Synchrony of neural activity in electric responses evoked by transient acoustic stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am, 30, 107–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goshorn E.L., Marx C.M. & Simmons A. 2011. Effect of measurement method on P1 amplitude in young adults. American Academy of Audiology, 7–9 April 2011. Chicago, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Hall J.W. 2006. New Handbook of Auditory Evoked Responses. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgetts W.E., Hagler P., Hakansson B.E.V. & Soli S. 2011. Technology-limited and patient-derived versus audibility-derived fittings in BAHA users: An efficacy study. Ear Hear, 32, 31–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenstad L.M., Seewald R.C., Cornelisse L.E. & Shantz J. 1999. Comparison of linear gain and wide dynamic range compression hearing aid circuits: Aided speech perception measures. Ear Hear, 20, 117–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent R.D. & Read C. 2002. The Acoustic Analysis of Speech. (2nd ed.) Albany, USA: Thomson Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb L.E. & Graham, J.T. 1967. Influence of signal variables on evoked response to sound. J Speech Hear Res, 10, 257–267.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lavoie B.A., Hine J.E. & Thornton R.D. 2008. The choice of distracting task can affect the quality of auditory evoked potentials recorded for clinical assessment. Int J Audiol, 47, 439–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. 2007. Cochlear Hearing Loss: Physiological, Psychological and Technical Issues (2nd ed.). Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Onishi S. & Davis H. 1968. Effects of duration and rise time of tone bursts on evoked V potentials. J Acoust Soc Am, 44, 582–591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce W., Golding M. & Dillon H. 2007. Cortical auditory evoked potentials in the assessment of auditory neuropathy: Two case studies. J Am Acad Audiol, 18, 380–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettigrew C.M., Murdoch B.E., Ponton C.W., Kei J., Chenery H.J. . 2004. Subtitled videos and mismatch negativity (MMN) investigations of spoken word processing. J Am Acad Audiol, 15, 469–485.
   Google Scholar
• Pickett J.M. 1999. The Acoustics of Speech Communication: Fundamentals, Speech Perception Theory, and Technology. Boston:Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Picton T.W. 2011. Human Auditory evoked Potentials. San Diego, USA: Plural Publishing Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Portney L.G. & Watkins M.P. 2008. Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, USA: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Prasher D.K. 1980. The influence of stimulus spectral content on rise time effects in cortical-evoked responses. Audiology, 19, 355–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruhm H.B. & Jansen J.W. 1969. Rate of stimulus change and the evoked response: I. Signal rise-time. J Aud Res, 3, 211–216.
   Google Scholar
• Scollie S.D. 2008. Children's speech recognition scores: The Speech Intelligibility Index and proficiency factors for age and hearing level. Ear Hear, 29, 543–556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scollie S.D., Ching T.Y.C., Seewald R.C., Dillon H., Britton L. . 2010. Children's speech perception and loudness ratings when fitted with hearing aids using the DSL v.4.1 and the NAL-NL1 prescriptions. Int J Audiol, 49 Suppl. 1, 26–34.
   Google Scholar
• Scollie S.D. & Seewald R.C. 2002. Evaluation of electroacoustic test signals I: Comparison with amplified speech. Ear Hear, 23, 477–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner P.H. & Jones H.C. 1968. Effects of signal duration and rise time on the auditory evoked potential. J Speech Hear Res, 11, 301–306.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stelmachowicz P.G., Kopun J., Mace A.L. & Lewis D.E. 1996. Measures of hearing aid gain for real speech. Ear Hear, 17, 520–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson J.M., Goswami U. & Baldeweg T. 2009. The ERP signature of sound rise time changes. Brain Res, 1254, 74–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay K.L., Billings C.J., Friesen L.M. & Souza P.E. 2006. Neural representation of amplified speech sounds. Ear Hear, 27, 93–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay K.L., Friesen L., Martin B.A. & Wright R. 2003. Test-retest reliability of cortical evoked potentials using naturally produced speech sounds. Ear Hear, 24, 225–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar