Development and validation of a Chinese music quality rating test

References

• Chasin M. & Russo F.A. 2004. Hearing aids and music. Trends Amplif, 8, 34–47.
   Google Scholar
• Cullington H.E. & Zeng F.G. 2011. Comparison of bimodal and bilateral cochlear implant users on speech recognition with competing talker, music perception, affective prosody discrimination, and talker identification. Ear Hear, 32, 16–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan R.J. & Sharot T. 2011. Neuroscience of Preference and Choice. Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms. London: Academic Press, pp. 227–256.
   Google Scholar
• Drennan W.R. & Rubinstein J.R. 2008. Music perception in cochlear implant users and its relationship with psychophysical capabilities. J Rehabil Res Dev, 45, 779–789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldmann H. & Kumpf W. 1988. Listening to music in the hard-of-hearing individual with and without hearing aid. Laryng Rhinol Otol, 67, 489–497.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gabrielsson A. & Sjogren H. 1979a. Perceived sound quality of hearing aids. Scand Audiol, 8, 159–169.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gabrielsson A. & Sjogren H. 1979b. Perceived sound quality of sound-reproducing systems. J Acoust Soc Am, 65, 1019–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabrielsson A., Hagerman B., Bech-Kristensen T. & Lundberg G. 1990. Perceived sound quality of reproductions with different frequency responses and sound levels. J Acoust Soc Am, 88, 1359–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabrielsson A., Schenkman B.N. & Hagerman B. 1988. The effects of different frequency responses on sound quality judgments and speech intelligibility. J Speech Hear Res, 31, 166–77.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gfeller K., Knutson J. F., Woodworth G., Witt S. & DeBus B. 1998. Timbral recognition and appraisal by adult cochlear implant users and normal-hearing adults. J Am Acad Audiol, 9, 1–19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gfeller K., Oleson J., Knutson J.F., Breheny P., Driscoll V. et al. 2008. Multivariate predictors of music perception and appraisal by adult cochlear implant users. J Am Acad Audiol, 19, 120–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gfeller K. & Lansing C.R. 1991. Melodic, rhythmic, and timbral perception of adult cochlear implant users. J Speech Hear Res, 34, 916–920.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gfeller K., Christ A., Knutson J., Witt S. & Mehr M. 2003. The effects of familiarity and complexity on appraisal of complex songs by cochlear implant recipients and normal hearing adults. J Music Ther, 40, 78–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gfeller K., Turner C., Mehr M., Woodworth G., Fearn R. et al. 2002a. Recognition of familiar melodies by adult cochlear implant recipients and normal hearing adults. Cochlear Implants Int, 3, 29–53.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gfeller K., Witt S., Adamek M., Mehr M., Rogers J. et al. 2002b. Effects of training on timbre recognition and appraisal by postlingually deafened cochlear implant recipients. J Am Acad Audiol, 13, 132–145.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gfeller K., Turner C., Oleson J., Zhang X., Gantz B. et al. 2007. Accuracy of cochlear implant recipients on pitch perception, melody recognition, and speech reception in noise. Ear Hear, 28, 412–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong Y.Y., Stickney G.S. & Zeng F.G. 2005. Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am, 117, 1351–1361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar S., Forster H.M., Bailey P. & Griffiths T.D. 2008. Mapping unpleasantness of sounds to their auditory representation. J Acoust Soc Am, 124, 3810–3817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeBlanc A. 1982. An interactive theory of music preference. J Music Ther, 19, 28–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leek M.R., Molis M.R., Kubli L.R. & Tufts J.B. 2008. Enjoyment of music by elderly hearing-impaired listeners. J Am Acad Audiol, 19, 519–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Looi V., McDermott H., McKay C. & Hickson L. 2008. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing-aid users. Ear Hear, 29, 421–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Looi V., McDermott H., McKay C. & Hickson L. 2007. Comparison of quality ratings for music by cochlear implant and hearing aid users. Ear Hear, 28, 59–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Looi V. & She J. 2010. Music perception of cochlear implant users: a questionnaire, and its implications for a music training program. Int J Audiol, 49, 116–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Looi V., Winter P., Anderson I. & Sucher C. 2011. A music quality rating test battery for cochlear implant users to compare the FSP and HDCIS strategies for music appreciation. Int J Audiol, 50, 503–518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundberg G., Ovegard A., Hagerman B., Gabrielsson A. & Brandstrom U. 1992. Perceived sound quality in a hearing aid with vented and closed earmould equalized in frequency response. Scand Audiol, 21, 87–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C. 2008. The role of temporal fine structure processing in pitch perception, masking, and speech perception for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired people. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 9, 399–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ovegard A., Lundberg G., Hagerman B., Gabrielsson A., Bengtsson M. et al. 1997. Sound quality judgment during acclimatization of hearing aid. Scand Audiol, 26, 43–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peretz I., Gaudreau D. & Bonnel A.M. 1998. Exposure effects on music preference and recognition. Mem Cognit, 26, 884–902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomerantz J.R. 2003. Perception: Overview. Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. London: Nature Publishing Group, pp.527–537.
   Google Scholar
• Sarant J.Z., Blamey P.J., Dowell R.C., Clark G.M. & Gibson W.P. 2001. Variation in speech perception scores among children with cochlear implants. Ear Hear, 22, 18–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sockalingam R., Beilin J. & Beck D.L. 2009. Sound quality considerations of hearing instruments. Hearing Review, 16, 22–28.
   Google Scholar
• Sun X.B., Wei Z.Y., Yu L.M., Wang Q. & Liang W. 2008. Prevalence and etiology of people with hearing impairment in China. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi, 29, 643–646.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tan S.L., Pfordresher P. & Harre R. 2010. Psychology of Music. From Sound to Significance. New York: Psychology Press, pp. 9–29.
   Google Scholar
• Veekmans K., Ressel L., Mueller J., Vischerf M. & Brockmeiere S.J. 2009. Comparison of music perception in bilateral and unilateral cochlear implant users and normal- hearing subjects. Audiol Neurotol, 14, 315–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Bismark G. 1974a. Sharpness as an attribute of the timbre of steady sounds. Acustica, 30, 159–172.
   Google Scholar
• von Bismark G. 1974b. Timbre of steady sounds: A factorial investigation of its verbal attributes. Acustica, 30, 147–159.
   Google Scholar
• Wong L.L. & Soli S.D. 2005. Development of the Cantonese hearing in noise test (CHINT). Ear Hear, 26, 276–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong L.L., Soli S.D., Liu S., Han N. & Huang M.W. 2007. Development of the Mandarin hearing in noise test (MHINT). Ear Hear, 28, 70–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright R. & Uchanski R.M. 2012. Music perception and appraisal: Cochlear implant users and simulated cochlear implant listening. J Am Acad Audiol, 23, 350–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uys M. 2011. Development of a music perception test for adult hearing-aid users. SAJCD, 58, 19–47.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang L. 2011. An investigation of the favourite music for Chinese residents. In URL: http://www.findoout.com/bbs/v2492/ (date last viewed: 06/08/12).
   Google Scholar
• Zhao F., Bai Z. & Stephens D. 2008. The relationship between changes in self-rated quality of life after cochlear implantation and changes in individual complaints. Clin Otolaryngol, 33, 427–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar