The ICF Core Sets for hearing loss – researcher perspective. Part I: Systematic review of outcome measures identified in audiological research

References

• Abrams H.B., Chisolm T.H. & McArdle R. 2005. Health-related quality of life and hearing aids: A tutorial. Trends Amplif, 9, 99–109.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arlinger S. 2000. Can we establish internationally equivalent outcome measures in audiological rehabilitation?. Ear Hear, 21 (Suppl. 4), 97–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Au D.K. 2003. Effects of stimulation rates on Cantonese lexical tone perception by cochlear implant users in Hong Kong. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci, 28, 533–538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler R.A. & Kramer S.E. 2000. Guidelines for choosing a self-report outcome measure. Ear Hear, 21 (Suppl. 4), 37–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benton A. 1978. Benton Revised Visual Retention Test (4th ed.). Helsinki: Psykologien Kustannus OY.
   Google Scholar
• Berget S. & Karlsson C. 2010. Självskattningsskalor och länkning till ICF: en litteraturstudie [Self-assessment questionnaires and linking to ICF]. Degree project. Örebro: Örebro University, School of Health and Medical Sciences, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Bess F.H. 2000. The role of generic health-related quality of life measures in establishing audiological rehabilitation outcomes. Ear Hear, 21 (Suppl. 4), 74–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besser J., Zekveld A.A., Kramer S.E., Rönnberg J. & Festen J.M. 2012. New measures of masked text recognition in relation to speech-in-noise perception and their associations with age and cognitive abilities. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 55, 194–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boothroyd A., Hanin L. & Hnath T. 1985. A Sentence Test of Speech Perception: Reliability, Set Equivalence, and Short-term Learning. New York: City University.
   Google Scholar
• Bowman D.M., Brown D.K. & Kimberley B.P. 2000. An examination of gender differences in DPOAE phase delay measurements in normal-hearing human adults. Hear Res, 142, 1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brännström K.J. & Wennerström I. 2010. Hearing-aid fitting outcome: Clinical application and psychometric properties of a Swedish translation of the international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA). J Am Acad Audiol, 21, 512–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockow T., Cieza A., Kuhlow H., Sigl T., Franke T. et al. 2004. Identifying the concepts contained in outcome measures of clinical trials on musculoskeletal disorders and chronic widespread pain using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health as a reference. J Rehabil Med Suppl, 36, 30–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockow T.T., Wohlfahrt K., Hillert A., Geyh S., Weigl M. et al. 2004. Identifying the concepts contained in outcome measures of clinical trials on depressive disorders using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health as a reference. J Rehabil Med Suppl, 36, 49–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chisolm T.H., Abrams H.B., McArdle R., Wilson R.H. & Doyle P.J. 2005. The WHO-DAS II: Psychometric properties in the measurement of functional health status in adults with acquired hearing loss. Trends Amplif, 9, 111–126.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Connington M. 2005. Hearing aid outcome tools: What are we really measuring? A case study. Semin Hear, 26, 170–175.
   Google Scholar
• Cox R.M., Alexander G.C. & Gilmore C. 1987. Development of the connected speech test (CST). Ear Hear, 8 (Suppl. 5), 119–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox R.M. 2005. Evidence-based practice in provision of amplification. J Am Acad Audiol, 16, 419–438.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cox R.M. & Alexander G.C. 2002. The international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA): Psychometric properties of the English version. Int J Audiol, 41, 30–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruice M., Worrall L. & Hickson L. 2000. Quality-of-life measurement in speech pathology and audiology. Asia Pac J Speech Lang Hear, 5, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Danermark B. 2005. A review of the psychosocial effects of hearing impairment in the working- age population. In: Stephens & Jones (eds.), The Impact of Genetic Hearing Impairment. London: Whurr, pp. 106–136.
   Google Scholar
• Danermark B., Cieza A., Gangé J., Gimigliano F., Granberg S. et al. 2010. International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Core Sets for hearing loss: A discussion paper and invitation. Int J Audiol, 49, 256–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Don M., Ponton C.W., Eggermont J.J. & Masuda A. 1993. Gender differences in cochlear response time: An explanation for gender amplitude differences in the unmasked auditory brain-stem response. J Acoust Soc Am, 94, 2135–2148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erber N. 1982. Auditory Training. Washington, USA: Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf.
   Google Scholar
• Escorpizo R., Finger M., Glässel A., Gradinger F., Lückenkemper M. et al. 2011. A systematic review of functioning in vocational rehabilitation using the international classification of functioning, disability and health. J Occup Rehabil, 21, 134–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fayers P.M. & Machin D. 2007. Quality of Life. The Assessment, Analysis and Interpretation of Patient-reported Outcomes (2nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Feeny D., Furlong W., Boyle M. & Torrance G. 1995. Multi-attribute health-status classification systems: Health utilities index. Pharmacoeconomics, 7, 490–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagné J.-P. 2003. Treatment effectiveness research in audiological rehabilitation: fundamental issues related to dependent variables. Int J Audiol, 42 (Suppl. 1), 104–111.
   Google Scholar
• Garstecki D.C. & Erler S.F. 1999. Older adult performance on the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired: Gender difference. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 42, 785–796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasparin M., Menegotto I. H. & Cunha C. S. 2010. Psychometric properties of the international outcome inventory for hearing aids. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol, 76, 85–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatehouse S. 1998. Speech tests as measures of outcome. Scand Audiol, 27 (Suppl. 49), 54–60.
   Google Scholar
• Granberg S., Möller K., Skagerstrand Å., Möller C. & Danermark B. 2014. The ICF Core Sets for hearing loss: researcher perspective, Part II: Linking outcome measures to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Int J Audiol, 53, 77–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins D.B. 2005. Effectiveness of counseling-based adult group aural rehabilitation programs: A systematic review of the evidence. J Am Acad Audiol, 16, 485–493.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hétu R., Getty L., Philibert L., Desilets F., Noble W. et al. 1994. Mise au point d'un outil clinique pour la mesure d'incapacités auditives et de handicaps [Development of a clinical tool for the measurement of the severity of hearing disabilities and handicaps]. J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol, 18, 83–95.
   Google Scholar
• Hickson L. 2009. Evidence-based practice in adult audiologic rehabilitation. In: Montano & Spitzer (eds.), Adult Audiologic Rehabilitation. San Diego: Plural Publisher Inc, pp. 367–380.
   Google Scholar
• Hickson L. & Scarinci N. 2007. Older adults with acquired hearing impairment: Applying the ICF in rehabilitation. Semin Speech Lang, 28, 283–290.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Humes L.E. & Dubno J.R. 2010. Factors affecting speech understanding in older adults. In: Gordon-Salant, Frisina, Popper & Fay (eds.), The Aging Auditory System, Springer Handbook of Auditory Research 34. New York: Springer, pp. 211–257.
   Google Scholar
• ICF Research Branch. 2012. ICF Core Sets. Manual for Clinical Practice. Göttingen: Hogrefe Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• ICF Research Branch. 2013. ICF Research Branch/ICF Core Sets Projects. Retrieved 25 March, 2013, from http://www.icf-research-branch.org/icf-core-sets-projects-sp-1641024398
   Google Scholar
• Jerger J. & Johnson K. 1988. Interactions of age, gender, and sensorineural hearing loss on ABR latency. Ear Hear, 9, 168–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiessling J., Pichora-Fuller M.K., Gatehouse S., Stephens D., Arlinger S. et al. 2003. Candidature for and delivery of audiological services: Special needs of older people. Int J Audiol, 42(Suppl. 2), 92–101.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer S.E., Goverts S.T., Dreschle, W.A., Boymans M. & Festen J.M. 2002. International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): Results from the Netherlands. Int J Audiol, 41, 36–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer S.E., Zekveld A.A. & Houtgast T. 2009. Measuring cognitive factors in speech comprehension: The value of using the Text Reception Threshold test as a visual equivalent of the SRT test. Scand J Psychol, 50, 507–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levo H., Stephens D., Poe D., Kentala E. & Pyykkö I. 2010. Use of ICF in assessing the effects of Ménière's disorder on life. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 119, 583–589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H., Zhang H., Liu S., Chen X., Han D. et al. 2011. International outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA): Results from the Chinese version. Int J Audiol, 50, 673–678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McArdle R., Chisolm T.H., Abrams H.B., Wilson R.H. & Doyle P.J. 2005. The WHO- DAS II: Measuring outcomes of hearing aid intervention for adults. Trends Amplif, 9, 127–143.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller J.D. 2007. Sex differences in the length of the organ of Corti in humans. J Acoust Soc Am, 121, 151–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möller K. 2003. Deafblindness: A challenge for assessment: Is the ICF a useful tool?. Int J Audiol, 42(Suppl. 1), 140–142.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Möller K., Eriksson K., Sadeghi A.M., Möller C. & Danermark B. 2009. Long-term ophthalmic health care in Usher syndrome type I from an ICF perspective. Disabil Rehabil, 31, 1283–1292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan A., Hickson L. & Worrall L. 2002. The impact of hearing impairment on quality of life of older people. Asia Pac J Speech Lang Hear, 7, 39–53.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson M., Soli S. & Sullivan J. 1994. Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 95, 1085–1099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble W. 1998. Self- Assessment of Hearing and Related Functions. London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Pichora-Fuller K.M. & Singh G. 2006. Effects of age on auditory and cognitive processing: Implications for hearing-aid fitting and audiologic rehabilitation. Trends Amplif, 10, 29–59.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pichora-Fuller M., Schneider B. & Daneman M. 1995. How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 97, 593–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Post M.W.M., Kirchberger I., Scheuringer M., Wollaars M.M. & Geyh S. 2010. Outcome parameters in spinal cord injury research: A systematic review using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a reference. Spinal Cord, 48, 522–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramkumar V. & Rangasayee R. 2010. Studying tinnitus in the ICF framework. Int J Audiol, 49, 645–650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato H., Sando I. & Takahashi H. 1991. Sexual dimorphism and development of the human cochlea. Computer 3D measurement. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh), 111, 1037–1040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders G.H., Chisolm T.H. & Abrams H.B. 2005. Measuring hearing aid outcomes: Not as easy as it seems. J Rehabil Res Dev, 42, 157–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarinci N., Worrall L. & Hickson L. 2009. The ICF and third-party disability: Its application to spouses of older people with hearing impairment. Disabil Rehabil, 31, 2088–2100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheuringer M., Grill E., Boldt C., Mittrach R., Mullner P. et al. 2005. Systematic review of measures and their concepts used in published studies focusing on rehabilitation in the acute hospital and in early post-acute rehabilitation facilities. Disabil Rehabil, 27, 419–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider B., Pichora-Fuller K.M. & Daneman M. 2010. Effects of senescent changes in audition and cognition on spoken language comprehension. In: Gordon-Salant, Frisina, Popper & Fay (eds.) The Aging Auditory System, Springer Handbook of Auditory Research, 34. New York: Springer Science, pp. 167–210.
   Google Scholar
• Staehelin K., Bertoli S., Probst R., Schindler C., Dratva J. et al. 2011. Gender and hearing aids: Patterns of use and determinants of nonregular use. Ear Hear, 32, 26–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens D. 2001. World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. J Audiol Med, 10, 7–10.
   Google Scholar
• Stroop J.R. 1935. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol, 18, 643–662.
   Google Scholar
• Stucki G. & Grimby G. 2004. Foreword: Applying the ICF in medicine. J Rehabil Med Suppl, 36, 5–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibodeau L.M. 2007. Speech Audiometry. In: Roeser & Hosford-Dunn (eds.), Audiology: Diagnosis. (2nd ed.). New York: Thieme Publishing Group, pp. 288–313.
   Google Scholar
• Ventry I. & Weinstein B. 1982. The Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly: A new tool. Ear Hear, 3, 128–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vink M. & Jolles J. 1985. A new version of the Trail-Making Test as an information processing task. J Clin Neuropsychol, 7, 162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware J.E.J., Snow K.K., Kosinski M. & Gandek B. 1993. SF-36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston: New England Medical Centre.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 1999. The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule Phase II Field Trial Instrument. Geneva: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2001a. Fifty-fourth World Health Assembly, WHA 54.21. Agenda Item 13.9, 22 May 2001. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Retrieved 7 January, 2013, from http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/wha-en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2001b. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva: WHO.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2009. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems: ICD-10 (10. rev., 2008 ed.). Geneva: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Vuorialho A., Karinen P. & Sorri M. 2006. Effect of hearing aids on hearing disability and quality of life in the elderly. Int J Audiol, 45, 400–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zochling J., Bonjean M., Grill E., Scheuringer M., Stucki G. et al. 2006. Systematic review of measures and their concepts used in published studies focusing on the treatment of acute inflammatory arthritis. Clin Rheumatol, 25, 807–813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar