332
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Short-term variability of pure-tone thresholds obtained with TDH-39P earphones

, , , , , , & show all
Pages S5-S15 | Received 13 Jun 2013, Accepted 12 Oct 2013, Published online: 25 Feb 2014

References

  • ANSI S1.4-1983 (R2006). American National Specification for Sound Level Meters. New York: Acoustical Society of America.
  • ANSI S3.44-1996 (R2006). Determination of Occupational Noise Exposure and Estimation of Noise-induced Hearing Impairment. New York: Acoustical Society of America.
  • ANSI S3.1-1999 (R2008) Maximum Permissible Ambient Noise Levels for Audiometric Test Rooms. New York: American National Standards Institute, Inc.
  • ANSI S3.6-2004 Specification for Audiometers. New York: Acoustical Society of America.
  • ANSI S3.6-2010. Specification for Audiometers. New York: Acoustical Society of America.
  • Atherley G.R. & Dingwall-Fordyce I. 1963. The reliability of repeated auditory threshold determination. Br J Ind Med, 20, 231–235.
  • Atherley G.R. & Johnston N. 1981. Audiometry: The ultimate test of success?Ann Occup Hyg, 27, 427–447.
  • Carhart R. & Hayes C. 1949. Clinical reliability of bone conduction audiometry. Laryngoscope, 59, 1084–1101.
  • Carhart R. & Jerger J.F. 1959. Preferred method for clinical determination of pure-tone thresholds. J Speech Hear Disord, 24, 330–345.
  • Ciletti L. & Flamme G.A. 2008. Prevalence of hearing impairment by gender and audiometric configuration: Results from the national health and nutrition examination survey (1999–2004) and the Keokuk County rural health study (1994–1998). J Am Acad Audiol, 19, 672–685.
  • Coles R.R., Lutman M.E. & Buffin J.T. 2000. Guidelines on the diagnosis of noise-induced hearing loss for medicolegal purposes. Clin Otolaryngol, 25, 264–273.
  • Corliss E.L.R. & Snyder W.F. 1950. Calibration of audiometers. J Acoust Soc Am, 22, 837–842.
  • Dobie R.A. 1983. Reliability and validity of industrial audiometry: Implications for hearing conservation program design. Laryngoscope, 93, 906–927.
  • Dobie R.A. 2005. Estimating noise-induced permanent threshold shift from audiometric shape: The ISO-1999 model. Ear Hear, 26, 630–635.
  • Flamme G.A., Deiters K., Tatro A., Geda K. & McGregor K. 2013. Reliable differences in wideband otoreflectance patterns among adults. American Auditory Society Annual Meeting. Scottsdale, USA.
  • Flamme G.A., Stephenson M.R., Deiters K., Tatro A., VanGessel D. et al. 2012. Typical noise exposure in daily life. Int J Audiol, 51, S3–S11.
  • Frank T. 2001. High-frequency (8 to 16 kHz) reference thresholds and intrasubject threshold variability relative to ototoxicity criteria using a Sennheiser HDA 200 earphone. Ear Hear, 22, 161–168.
  • Gravendeel D.W. & Plomp R. 1959. The relation between permanent and temporary noise dips. Arch Otolaryngol, 69, 714–719.
  • Guild S.R. 1932. A method of classifying audiograms. Laryngoscope, 42, 821–836.
  • Hetu R. 1979. Critical analysis of the effectiveness of secondary prevention of occupational hearing loss. J Occup Med, 10, 36–44.
  • High W.S. & Gallo R.P. 1963. Audiometric reliability in an industrial hearing conservation program. J Aud Res, 3, 15–34.
  • Hosmer D.W. & Lemeshow S. 2000. Applied Logistic Regression. Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Huber P.J. 1967. The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Berkely Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Berkely: University of California Press, pp. 221–233.
  • IEC. 2009. IEC-60318-1 Electroacoustics - Simulators of the human head and ear. Part 1: Ear simulator for the measurement of supra-aural and circumaural earphones. Geneva, Switzerland: IEC.
  • Lutman M.E. & Qasem H.Y.N. 1998. A source of notches at 6 kHz. In: D. Prasher & L. Luxon (eds.) Advances on Noise Research: Biological Effects of Noise, pp. 170–176.
  • NIOSH 1998. Occupational Noise Exposure: Revised Criteria 1998. US Department of Health and Human Services. DHHS Publication 98–126. Cincinnati: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
  • Nixon C.W., Johnson D.L. & Stephenson M.R. 1977. Asymptotic behavior of temporary threshold shift and recovery from 24- and 48-hour exposures. Aviat Space Envir Med, 48, 311–315.
  • OSHA. 1981. Occupational Noise Exposure; Hearing Conservation Amendment, Part 2 of 2. US Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, 29 CFR Part 1910, 46 Federal Register 4078. 34.
  • OSHA. 1983. Occupational noise exposure: Hearing Conservation Amendment; Final rule. US Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, 29 CFR 1910.95, 48 Federal Register 9776–9785.
  • OSHA. 2003. Recording Criteria for Cases Involving Occupational Hearing Loss. US Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Retrieved from: http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table = STANDARDS&p_id = 9641, August 19, 2013.
  • Rabinowitz P.M., Galusha D., Slade M.D., Dixon-Ernst C., Sircar K.D. et al. 2006. Audiogram notches in noise-exposed workers. Ear Hear, 27, 742–750.
  • Rosenthal R. & Rosnow R.L. 1991. Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analyses. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Schmuziger N., Probst R. & Smurzynski J. 2004. Test-retest reliability of pure-tone thresholds from 0.5 to 16 kHz using Sennheiser HDA 200 and Etymotic Research ER-2 earphones. Ear Hear, 25, 127–132.
  • Stephenson M.R., Themann C.L. & Murphy W.J. 2004. Thoughts on the noise “notch” and the importance of testing 8 kHz. CAOHC Update, 16(3), 1, 6.
  • Tukey J.W. 1977. Exploratory Data Analysis. Reading, USA: Addison-Wesley.
  • US Department of Labor. 2010. Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification. US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Retrieved from: www.bls.gov/soc/, August 19, 2013.
  • Veneman C.E., Gordon-Salant S., Matthews L.J. & Dubno J.R. 2013. Age and measurement time-of-day effects on speech recognition in noise. Ear Hear, 34, 288–299.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.