References
- Boothroyd A. 1968. Statistical theory of the speech discrimination score. J Acoust Soc Am, 43, 362–367.
- Brand T.C. & Kollmeier B. 2002. Efficient adaptive procedures for threshold and concurrent slope estimates for psychophysics and speech intelligibility tests. J Acoust Soc Am, 111, 2801–2810.
- Brand T., Wittkop T., Wagener K.C. & Kollmeier B. 2004. Comparison of the Oldenburg sentence test and the Freiburg word test as closed versions (in German). Proceedings of the 7th annual meeting of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Audiologie (DGA), Leipzig.
- Elberling C., Ludvigsen C. & Lyregaard P.E. 1989. Dantale: A new Danish speech material. Scand Audiol, 18, 169–175.
- Green D.M., Richards V.M. & Forrest T.G. 1989. Stimulus step size and heterogeneous stimulus conditions in adaptive psychophysics. J Acoust Soc Am, 86, 629–636.
- Hagerman B. 1982. Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise. Scand Audiol, 11, 79–87.
- Hochmuth S., Brand T., Zokoll M.A., Castro F.Z., Wardenga N. et al. 2012. A Spanish matrix sentence test for assessing speech reception thresholds in noise. Int J Audiol, 51, 536–544.
- ISO 8253-2:2009, Acoustics - Audiometric test methods - Part 2: Sound field audiometry with pure-tone and narrow-band test signals. Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
- ISO 8253-3:2012, Acoustics - Audiometric test methods – Part 3: Speech audiometry, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
- Jansen S., Luts H., Wagener K.C., Kollmeier B., Del Rio M. et al 2012. Comparison of three types of French speech-in-noise tests: A multi-center study. Int J Audiol, 51, 164–173.
- Leensen M.C., de Laat J.A. & Dreschler W.A. 2011a. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 1: Test evaluation for noise-induced hearing loss identification. Int J Audiol, 50, 823–834.
- Leensen M.C., de Laat J.A., Snik A.F. & Dreschler W.A. 2011bSpeech- in-noise screening tests by internet, part 2: Improving test sensitivity for noise-induced hearing loss. Int J Audiol, 50, 835–848.
- Nielsen J.B. & Dau T. 2011. The Danish Hearing-in-noise test. Int J Audiol, 50, 202–208.
- Newey W.K. & McFadden D. 1994. Chapter 36: Large sample estimation and hypothesis testing. In: R. Engle and D. McFadden. Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 4. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, pp. 2111–2245.
- Ozimek E., Warzybok A. & Kutzner D. 2010. Polish sentence matrix test for speech intelligibility measurement in noise. Int J Audiol, 49, 444–454.
- Wagener K., Brand T. & Kollmeier B. 1999a. Development and evaluation of a German sentence test, part II: Optimization of the Oldenburg sentence test (in German). Zeitschrift für Audiologie, 38, 44–56.
- Wagener K., Brand T. & Kollmeier B. 1999b. Development and evaluation of a German sentence test, part III: Evaluation of the Oldenburg sentence test (in German). Zeitschrift für Audiologie, 38, 86–95.
- Wagener K.C., Josvassen J.L. & Ardenkjaer R. 2003. Design, optimization and evaluation of a Danish sentence test in noise. Int J Audiol, 42, 10–17.
- Wagener K., Kühnel V. & Kollmeier B. 1999c. Development and evaluation of a German sentence test, part I: Design of the Oldenburg sentence test (in German). Zeitschrift für Audiologie, 38, 4–15.