1,334
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Psychometric properties of a revised Danish translation of the international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA)

, &
Pages 302-308 | Received 21 May 2013, Accepted 07 Dec 2013, Published online: 29 Jan 2014

References

  • Allen P.D. & Eddins D.A. 2010. Presbycusis phenotypes form a heterogeneous continuum when ordered by degree and configuration of hearing loss. Hear Res, 264, 10–20.
  • Brännström K.J. & Wennerström I. 2010. Hearing aid fitting outcome: Clinical application and psychometric properties of a Swedish translation of the international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA). J Am Acad Audiol, 21, 512–521.
  • Cox R.M., Hyde M., Gatehouse S., Noble W., Dillon H. et al. 2000. Optimal outcome measures, research priorities, and international cooperation. Ear Hear, 21, 106S–115S.
  • Cox R.M., Stephens D. & Kramer S.E. 2002. Translations of the international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA). Int J Audiol, 41, 3–26.
  • Cox R.M. & Alexander G.C. 2002. The international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA): Psychometric properties of the English version. Int J Audiol, 41, 30–35.
  • Gasparin M., Menegotto I.H. & da Cunha C.S. 2010. Psychometric properties of the international outcome inventory for hearing aids. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol, 76, 85–90.
  • Heuermann H., Kinkel M. & Tchorz J. 2005. Comparison of psychometric properties of the international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA) in various studies. Int J Audiol, 44, 102–109.
  • Jespersen C.T., Bille M., Groth J. & Hansen T. 2005. Danish reference data for the IOI-HA questionnaire. In: A. Rasmussen, T. Paulsen, T. Andersen, C. Larsen (eds.) Hearing aid Fitting. Copenhagen: 21st Danavox Symposium, pp. 475–492.
  • Kramer S.E., Governs S.T., Dressler W.A., Boymans M. & Fasten J.M. 2002. International outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA): Results from the Netherlands. Int J Audiol, 41, 36–41.
  • Liu H., Zhang H., Liu S., Chen X., Han D. et al. 2011. International outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA): Results from the Chinese version. Int J Audiol, 50, 673–678.
  • Olsen S.Ø., Lantz J., Nielsen L.A. & Brännström K.J. 2012. Acceptable noise level (ANL) with Danish and non-semantic speech materials in adult hearing-aid users. Int J Audiol, 51, 678–688.
  • Olusanya B. 2004. Self-reported outcomes of aural rehabilitation in a developing country. Int J Audiol, 43, 563–571.
  • Parving A. & Christensen B. 2004. Clinical trial of a low-cost, solar-powered hearing aid. Acta Otolaryngol, 124, 416–420.
  • Serbetcioglu B., Mule B., Kinkily G. & Uzunoglu S. 2009. Results of factorial validity and reliability of the international outcome inventory for hearing aids in Turkish. J Int Adv Otol, 5, 80–86.
  • Smith S.L., Noe C.M. & Alexander G.C. 2009. Evaluation of the international outcome inventory for hearing aids in a veteran sample. J Am Acad Audiol, 20, 374–380.
  • Stephens D. 2002. The international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA) and its relationship to the client-oriented scale of improvement (COSI). Int J Audiol, 41, 42–47.
  • Thorén E.S., Andersson G. & Lunner T. 2012. The use of research questionnaires with hearing impaired adults: Online vs. paper-and-pencil administration. BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord, 12, 1–6.
  • Vestergaard M.D. 2006. Self-report outcome in new hearing-aid users: Longitudinal trends and relationships between subjective measures of benefit and satisfaction. Int J Audiol, 45, 382–392.