477
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

A preliminary investigation into the use of an auditory brainstem response (ABR) simulator for training audiology students in waveform analysis

, , , &
Pages 514-521 | Received 13 Sep 2013, Accepted 02 Feb 2014, Published online: 04 Apr 2014

References

  • Akerlind G.S. & Trevitt A.C. 2006. Enhancing self-directed learning through education technology: When students resist the change. Innovations in Education and Training International, 36, 96–105.
  • Bach M., Stegmaier J. & Rover J. 1984. A versatile simulator of evoked potentials. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 57, 97–98.
  • Bradley A.P. & Wilson W.J. 2005. Automated analysis of the auditory brainstem response using derivative estimation wavelets. Audiol Neurootol, 10, 6–21.
  • Durham J.A., Thelin J.W., Muenchen R.A. & Halpin C.F. 1994. Evaluation of a behavioral audiometry simulator for teaching visual reinforcement audiometry. J Am Acad Audiol, 5, 417–25.
  • Elberling C. & Don M. 2007. Detecting and assessing synchronous neural activity in the temporal domain (SNR and response detection). In: R. Burkard, M Don, J. Eggermont (eds.), Auditory Evoked Potentials: Basic Principles and Clinical Applications. Baltimore: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
  • Gordon J.A., Wilkerson W.M., Shaffer D.W. & Armstrong E.G. 2001. ‘Practicing’ medicine without risk: Students’ and educators’ responses to high-fidelity patient simulation. Academic Medicine, 76, 469–72.
  • Hall J.W. 2007. New Handbook of Auditory-evoked Responses. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Hake R.R. 1998. Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66, 64–74.
  • Heitz A. 2013. Improving Clinical Education Through the Use of Virtual Patient-based Computer Simulations. PhD thesis, University of Canterbury.
  • Hill Y., Lornas L. & Macgregor J. 2003. Students‘ perceptions of quality in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 11, 15–20.
  • Kaplan R. & Ozdamar O. 1987. Microprocessor-based auditory brainstem response (ABR) simulator. Med Biol Eng Comput, 25, 560–56.
  • Lieberth A.K. & Martin D.R. 2005. The instructional effectiveness of a web-based audiometry simulator. J Am Acad Audiol, 16, 79–84.
  • Mahmood T. & Darzi A. 2004. The learning curve for a colonoscopy simulator in the absence of any feedback: No feedback, no learning. Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques, 18, 1224–30.
  • Meltzer D.E. 2002. The relationship between mathematics preparation and conceptual learning gains in physics: A possible “hidden variable” in diagnostic pretest scores. American Journal of Physics, 70, 1259–68.
  • McPherson B. 2012. Newborn hearing screening in developing countries: Needs & new directions. Indian J Med Res, 135, 152–53.
  • Morgan P.J. & Cleave-Hogg D. 2000. A Canadian simulation experience: Faculty and student opinions of a performance evaluation study. Br J Anaesth, 85, 779–781.
  • Naves K.F., Pereira A.A., Nasuto S.J., Russo I.P. & Andrade A.O. 2012. Assessment of inter-examiner agreement and variability in the manual classification of auditory brainstem response. Biomedical Engineering Online, 11, 86.
  • Pratt T.L., Olsen W.O. & Bauch C.D. 1995. Four-channel ABR recordings: Consistency in interpretation. Am J Audiol, 4, 47–54.
  • Rosen K.R., McBride J.M. & Drake R.L. 2009. The use of simulation in medical education to enhance students’ understanding of basic sciences. Med Teach, 31, 842–846.
  • Scalese R.J., Obeso V.T. & Issenberg S.B. 2008. Simulation technology for skills training and competency assessment in medical education. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 23 Suppl. 1, 46–49.
  • Sistrunk R.S. 2002. The Development of Simulated Case Studies on CD-ROM for Audiology Students. PhD, University of Cincinnati.
  • Strong J., Hughes C., Wilson W., Arnott W., Isles R. et al. 2012. Perceptions of feedback among undergraduate and postgraduate students of four health science disciplines. The Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice, 10, 1–8.
  • Vidler M. & Parkert D. 2004. Auditory brainstem response threshold estimation: Subjective threshold estimation by experienced clinicians in a computer simulation of the clinical test. Int J Audiol, 43, 417–29.
  • Weller J.M. 2004. Simulation in undergraduate medical education: Bridging the gap between theory and practice. Medical Education, 38, 32–38.
  • Wilson W.J., Chapple J.A., Phillips K.M., Snell K.T., Bradley A.P. et al. 2006. Over-complete discrete wavelet transformation of the normal auditory brainstem response improves prediction of outcome following severe acute closed head injury. Audiol Neurotol, 11(4), 249–258.
  • Wilson W.J., Hill A., Hughes J., Sher A. & Laplante-Levesque A. 2010. Student audiologists’ impressions of a simulation training program. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Audiology, 32, 19–30.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.