Distribution characteristics of normal pure-tone thresholds

References

• ANSI S3.21. 1978. Methods for manual pure-tone threshold audiometry. American National Standards Institute, New York.
   Google Scholar
• ANSI S3.6. 2010. Specification for audiometers. American National Standards Institute, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Bunch C.C. 1943. Clinical Audiometry. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby.
   Google Scholar
• Carhart R. & Jerger J.F. 1959. Preferred method for clinical determination of pure-tone thresholds. J Speech Hear Dis, 24, 330–345.
   Google Scholar
• Corso J.F. 1959. Age and sex differences in pure-tone thresholds. J Acoust Soc Am, 31, 498–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doane D.P. & Seward L.E. 2011. Measuring skewness: A forgotten statistic. J Stat Educ, 19, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Eikelboom R.H., Swanepoel D.W., Motakef S. & Upson G. 2013. Clinical validation of the AMTAS automated audiometer. Int J Audiol, 52, 342–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher H. & Wegel R.L.1922. The frequency sensitivity of normal ears. Proc National Acad Sciences, 8, 5–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fortmann-Roe S. 2012. www.http://scott.fortmann-roe.com/docs/BiasVariance.html, retrieved 2 March 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Hughson W. & Westlake H.D. 1944. Manual for program outline for rehabilitation of aural casualties both military and civilian. Trans Amer Acad Ophthalmology Otolaryngology, 48, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter J.A., Straker L., Beilby J., Bucks R., Davis T. et al. 2013. Rationale, design and methods for a community-based study of clustering and interactions of chronic disease processes and their effects on ageing: The Busselton Healthy Ageing Study. BMC Public Health. 13,936. Published online Oct 8, 2013. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEC 60645-1. 2012. Electroacoustics - Audiometric Equipment - Part 1: Equipment for pure-tone audiometry. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 389.1. 1998. Acoustics - Reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment - Part 1: Reference equivalent threshold sound pressure levels for pure tones and supra-aural earphones. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 389.8. 1998. Acoustics - Reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment - Part 8: Reference equivalent threshold sound pressure levels for pure tones and circumaural earphones. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• Jones I.H. & Knudsen V.O. 1924. Functional tests of hearing. Laryngoscope, 34, 673–686.
   Google Scholar
• Lawton B.W. 2005. Variation of young normal-hearing thresholds measured using different audiometric earphones: Implications for the acoustic coupler and the ear simulator. Int J Audiol, 44, 444–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leek M.R. 2001. Adaptive procedures in psychophysical research. Percep Psychophys, 63, 1279–1292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahomed F., Swanepoel D.W., Eikelboom R.H. & Soer S. 2013. Validity of automated threshold audiometry: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ear Hear, 34, 745–752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolis R.H., Eikelboom R.H., Johnson C., Ginter S.M., Swanepoel D.W. et al. 2013. False air-bone gaps at 4 kHz in listeners with normal hearing and sensorineural hearing loss. Int J Audiol, 52, 526–532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolis R.H., Frisina R. & Walton J.P. 2011. AMTAS® automated method for testing auditory sensitivity: II. Air conduction audiograms in children and adults. Int J Audiol, 50, 434–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolis R.H., Glasberg B.R., Creeke S. & Moore B.C.J. 2010. AMTAS automated method for testing auditory sensitivity: Validation studies. Int J Audiol, 49, 185–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolis R.H. & Madsen B. 2015. The acoustic test environment for hearing testing. J Amer Acad Audiol, in press.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolis R.H. & Moore B.C.J. 2011. Automated method for testing auditory sensitivity: III. Sensorineural hearing loss and air-bone gaps. Int J Audiol, 50, 440–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolis R.H. & Saly G.L. 2007. Toward a standard description of hearing loss. Int J Audiol, 46, 746–758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolis R.H. & Saly G.L. 2008a. Distribution of hearing loss characteristics in a clinical population. Ear Hear, 29, 524–532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolis R.H. & Saly G.L. 2008b. Asymmetrical hearing loss: Definition, validation, prevalence. Otol Neurotol, 29, 422–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolis R.H., Saly G.L., Le C. & Laurence J. 2007. Qualind™: A method for assessing the accuracy of automated tests. J Am Acad Audiol, 18, 78–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolis R.H., Wilson R.H., Popelka G.R., Eikelboom R.H., Swanepoel D.W. et al. 2015. A statistical model of the air-bone gap: Evidence of bias in manual audiometry. Int J Audiol, submitted for publication.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meucci S. 2010. Antonio and the Electric Scream. Boston, USA: Brandon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sackett D.L. 1979. Bias in analytic research. J Chron Dis, 32, 51–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Studebaker G.A. 1967. Intertest variability in the air-bone gap. J Speech Hear Disord, 32, 82–86.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swanepoel D., Eikelboom R.H., Friedland P.F., Atlas M.D. & Hunter M. 2013. Self-reported hearing loss in baby boomers from the Busselton Health Study: Audiometric correspondence and predictive value. J Am Acad Audiol, 24, 514–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick B.G. & Fidell L.S. 1996. Using Multivariate Statistics (3rd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Weissler P. 1968. International standard reference zero for audiometers. J Acoust Soc Am, 44, 264–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilber L.A. & Goodhill V. 1967. Real ear versus artificial mastoid methods of calibration of bone-conduction vibrators. J Speech Hear Res, 10, 405–416.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson R.H. & McArdle R. 2013. Characteristics of the audiometric 4000 Hz notch (744 553 veterans) and the 3000, 4000, and 6000 Hz notches (539 932 veterans). J Rehabil Res Dev, 50, 111–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson R.H. & McArdle R. 2014. A treatise on the thresholds of interoctave frequencies: 1500, 3000, and 6000 Hz. J Am Acad Audiol, 25, 171–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar