Cortical encoding of speech acoustics: Effects of noise and amplification

References

• Adler G. & Adler J. 1991. Auditory stimulus processing at different stimulus intensities as reflected by auditory evoked potentials. Biol Psychiatry, 29, 347–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agung K., Purdy S.C., McMahon C.M. & Newall P. 2006. The use of cortical auditory-evoked potentials to evaluate neural encoding of speech sounds in adults. J Am Acad Audiol, 17, 559–572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aiken S.J. & Picton T.W. 2008. Human cortical responses to the speech envelope. Ear Hear, 29, 139–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson S. & Kraus N. 2010. Sensory-cognitive interaction in the neural encoding of speech in noise: A review. J Am Acad Audiol, 21, 575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ANSI. 2003. ANSI S3. 22-2003, Specification of hearing-aid characteristics.
   Google Scholar
• Antinoro F., Skinner P.H. & Jones J.J. 2005. Relation between sound intensity and amplitude of the AER at different stimulus frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am, 46, 1433–1436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baltzell L.S. & Billings C.J. 2013. Sensitivity of offset and onset cortical auditory evoked potentials to signals in noise. Clin Neurophysiol, 125, 370–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson D., Clark T.M. & Johnson J.S. 1992. Patient experiences with multiband full dynamic range compression. Ear Hear, 13, 320–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukes E.W., Munro K.J. & Purdy S.C. 2009. Duration-sensitive neurons in the auditory cortex. Neuroreport, 20, 1129–1133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billings C.J., Tremblay K.L., Souza P.E. et al. 2007. Effects of hearing aid amplification and stimulus intensity on cortical auditory evoked potentials. Audiol Neurootol, 12, 234–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billings C.J., Tremblay K.L., Stecker G.C. et al. 2009. Human evoked cortical activity to signal-to-noise ratio and absolute signal level. Hear Res, 254, 15–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billings C.J., Tremblay K.L. & Miller C.W. 2011. Aided cortical auditory evoked potentials in response to changes in hearing aid gain. Int J Audiol, 50, 459–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billings C.J., Bennett K.O., Molis M.R. & Leek M.R. 2011. Cortical encoding of signals in noise: Effects of stimulus type and recording paradigm. Ear Hear, 32, 53–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billings C.J., Papesh M.A. & Penman et al. 2012. Clinical use of aided cortical auditory evoked potentials as a measure of physiological detection or physiological discrimination. Int J Otolaryngol.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Billings C.J., McMillan G.P., Penman T.M. & Gille S.M. 2013. Predicting perception in noise using cortical auditory evoked potentials. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 14, 891–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisgaard N., Vlaming M.S. & Dahlquist M. 2010. Standard audiograms for the IEC 60118-15 measurement procedure. Trends in Amplif, 14, 113–120.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Byrne D., Dillon H., Tran K., Arlinger S. & Wibraham K. 1994. An international comparison of longterm average speech spectra. J Acoust Soc Am, 96, 2108–2120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter L., Golding M., Dillon H. & Seymour J. 2010. The detection of infant cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) using statistical and visual detection techniques. J Am Acad Audiol, 21, 347–356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chasin M. & Russo F.A. 2004. Hearing aids and music. Trends Amplif, 8, 35–47.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Digeser F.M., Wohlberedt T. & Hoppe U. 2009. Contribution of spectrotemporal features on auditory event-related potentials elicited by consonant-vowel syllables. Ear Hear, 30, 704–712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doellinger M., Burger M., Hoppe U. et al. 2011. Effects of consonant-vowel transitions in speech stimuli on cortical auditory evoked potentials in adults. The Open Neurology Journal, 5, 37.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Doyle K.J., Danhauer J.L. & Edgerton B.J. 1981. Features from normal and sensorineural listeners nonsense syllable test errors. Ear Hear, 2, 117–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easwar V., Purcell D.W. & Scollie S.D. 2012a. Electroacoustic comparison of hearing aid output of phonemes in running speech versus isolation: Implications for aided cortical auditory evoked potentials testing. Int J Otolaryngol.
   Google Scholar
• Easwar V., Glista D., Purcell D.W. & Scollie S.D. 2012b. Hearing aid processing changes tone burst onset: Effect on cortical auditory evoked potentials in individuals with normal audiometric thresholds. Am J Audiol, 21, 82–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easwar V., Glista D., Purcell D.W. & Scollie S.D. 2012c. The effect of stimulus choice on cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEP): Consideration of speech segment positioning within naturally produced speech. Int J Audiol, 51, 926–931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn M. 2004. Maximizing the voice-to-noise ratio (VNR) via voice priority processing. The Hearing Review, 11, 54–59.
   Google Scholar
• Gage N., Poeppel D., Roberts T.P. et al. 1998. Auditory evoked M100 reflects onset acoustics of speech sounds. Brain Res, 814, 236–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glista D., Easwar V., Purcell D.W. & Scollie S. 2012. A pilot study on cortical auditory evoked potentials in children: Aided CAEPs reflect improved high-frequency audibility with frequency compression hearing aid technology. Int J Otolaryngol.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Godey B., Schwartz D., De Graaf J.B. et al. 2001. Neuromagnetic source localization of auditory evoked fields and intracerebral evoked potentials: A comparison of data in the same patients. Clin Neurophysiol, 112, 1850–1859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golding M., Purdy S., Sharma M. et al. 2006. The effect of stimulus duration and inter-stimulus interval on cortical responses in infants. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Audiology, 28, 122–136.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon-Salant S. 1985. Recognition of digitized CV syllables in multitalker babble. Int J Audiol, 24, 241–253.
   Google Scholar
• Heil P. 2003. Coding of temporal onset envelope in the auditory system. Speech Common, 41, 123–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde M. 1997. The N1 response and its applications. Audiol Neurootol, 2, 281–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Istók E., Freiberg A., Huotilainen M. & Tervaniemi M. 2013. Expressive timing facilitates the neural processing of phrase boundaries in music: Evidence from event-related potentials. PloS one, 8, e55150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenstad L.M., Marynewich S. & Stapells D.R. 2012. Slow cortical potentials and amplification, Part II: Acoustic measures. Int J Otolaryngol, 2012, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Keenan J.P., Thangaraj V., Halpern A.R. & Schlaug G. 2001. Absolute pitch and planum temporal. Neuroimage, 14, 1402–1408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keidser G., Brew C. & Peck A. 2003. Proprietary fitting algorithms compared with one another and with generic formulas. The Hearing J, 56, 28–32.
   Google Scholar
• Keidser G., Ching T., Dillon H., Agung K., Brew C. et al. 2002. The National Acoustic Laboratories (NAL) CDs of speech and noise for hearing aid evaluation: Normative data and potential applications. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Audiology, 24, 16.
   Google Scholar
• Kim G. & Loizou P.C. 2011. Gain-induced speech distortions and the absence of intelligibility benefit with existing noise-reduction algorithms J Acoust Soc Am, 130, 1581–1596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kochkin S. 2007. MarkeTrak VII: Obstacles to adult non-user adoption of hearing aids. The Hearing J, 60, 24–51.
   Google Scholar
• Korczak P.A., Kurtzberg D. & Stapells D.R. 2005. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss and personal hearing aids on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing. Ear Hear, 26, 165–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korczak P.A. & Stapells D.R. 2010. Effects of various articulatory features of speech on cortical event-related potentials and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing. Ear Hear, 31, 491–504. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181d8683d.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomber S.G. & Eggermont J. (eds.). 2006. Reprogramming the Cerebral Cortex: Plasticity Following Central and Peripheral Lesions. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lavoie B.A., Hine J.E. & Thornton R.D. 2008. The choice of distracting task can affect the quality of auditory evoked potentials recorded for clinical assessment. Int J Audiol, 47, 439–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin B.A., Kurtzberg D. & Stapells D.R. 1999. The effects of decreased audibility produced by high-pass noise masking on N1 and the mismatch negativity to speech sounds /ba/ and /da/. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 42, 271–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin B.A., Tremblay K.L. & Korczak P. 2008. Speech evoked potentials: From the laboratory to the clinic. Ear Hear, 29, 285–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marynewich S., Jenstad L.M. & Stapells D.R. 2012. Slow cortical potentials and amplification, Part I: N1-P2 measures. Int J Otolaryngol, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• McCullagh J., Musiek F.E. & Shinn J.B. 2012. Auditory cortical processing in noise in normal-hearing young adults. Audiol Med, 10, 114–121.
   Google Scholar
• Moore B.C. 1996. Perceptual consequences of cochlear hearing loss and their implications for the design of hearing aids. Ear Hear, 17, 133–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro K.J., Purdy S.C., Ahmed S., Begum R. & Dillon H. 2011. Obligatory cortical auditory evoked potential waveform detection and differentiation using a commercially available clinical system: HEARLab. Ear Hear, 32, 782–786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oates P.A., Kurtzberg D. & Stapells D.R. 2002. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing. Ear Hear, 23, 399–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onishi S. & Davis H. 1968. Effects of duration and rise time of tone bursts on evoked V potentials. J Acoust Soc Am, 44, 582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostroff J.M., Martin B.A. & Boothroyd A. 1998. Cortical evoked response to acoustic change within a syllable. Ear Hear, 19, 290–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phatak S.A., Yoon Y.S. & Gooler D.M. et al. 2009. Consonant recognition loss in hearing impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 126, 2683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips D.P. 1990. Neural representation of sound amplitude in the auditory cortex: Effects of noise masking. Behav Brain Res, 37, 197–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips D.P., Hall S.E. & Boehnke S.E. 2002. Central auditory onset responses and temporal asymmetries in auditory perception. Hear Res, 167, 192–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picton T.W., Woods D.L. & Proulx G.B. 1978. Human auditory sustained potentials. II. Stimulus relationships. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 45, 198–210.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plomp R. 1988. The negative effect of amplitude compression in multichannel hearing aids in light of the modulation-transfer function. J Acoust Soc Am, 83, 2322–2327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt H., Starr A., Michalewski H.J., Bleich N. et al. 2008. The auditory P50 component to onset and offset of sound. Clin Neurophysiol, 119, 376–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purdy S.C., Katsch R., Dillon H., Storey L., Sharma M. et al. 2005. Aided cortical auditory evoked potentials for hearing instrument evaluation in infants. A Sound Foundation Through Early Amplification, 115–127.
   Google Scholar
• Purdy S., Katsch R., Storey L., Dillon H., Agung K. et al, 2006. Obligatory cortical auditory evoked potentials to speech and tonal stimuli in infants and adults with normal hearing. Retrieved from http://www.frye.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013b/download/articles/Ear_and_Hear.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ross B. & Tremblay K. 2009. Stimulus experience modifies auditory neuromagnetic responses in young and older listeners. Hearing Res, 248, 48–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schadwinkel S. & Gutschalk A. 2010. Activity associated with stream segregation in human auditory cortex is similar for spatial and pitch cues. Cerebral Cortex, 20, 2863–2873.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schum D.J. & Beck D.L. 2006. Open Ear Hearing Aid Fittings. Retrieved from http://www.focusonpeople.oticonusa.com/Oticon/Professional_Resources/Library/News_From_Oticon_/Open_Ear_Hearing_Aid_Fittings.html.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma M., Purdy S.C. & Kelly A.S. 2014. The contribution of speech-evoked cortical auditory evoked potentials to the diagnosis and measurement of intervention outcomes in children with auditory processing disorder. Semin Hear, 35, 51–64.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma A. & Dorman M.F. 1999. Cortical auditory evoked potential correlates of categorical perception of voice-onset time. J Acoust Soc Am, 106, 1078–1083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma A., Marsh C.M. & Dorman M.F. 2000. Relationship between N1 evoked potential morphology and the perception of voicing. J Acoust Soc Am, 108, 3030–3035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skrandies W. 1989. Data reduction of multichannel fields: Global field power and principal components. Brain Topogr, 2, 73–80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tremblay K.L., Friesen L., Martin B.A. & Wright R. 2003. Test-retest reliability of cortical evoked potentials using naturally produced speech sounds. Ear Hear, 24, 225–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay K.L., Billings C.J., Friesen L.M. & Souza P.E. 2006. Neural representation of amplified speech sounds. Ear Hear, 27, 93–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varga A. & Steeneken H.J. 1993. Assessment for automatic speech recognition: II. NOISEX-92: A database and an experiment to study the effect of additive noise on speech recognition systems. Speech Commun, 12, 247–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner-Czyz A.D., Davis B.L. & MacNeilage P.F. 2010. Accuracy of consonant-vowel syllables in young cochlear implant recipients and hearing children in the single-word period. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 53, 2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiting K.A., Martin B.A. & Stapells D.R. 1998. The effects of broadband noise masking on cortical event-related potentials to speech sounds /ba/ and /da. Ear Hear, 19, 218–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson W.J., Arnott W. & Henning C. 2013. A systematic review of electrophysiological outcomes following auditory training in school-age children with auditory processing deficits Int J Audiol, 52(11), 721–730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winholtz W.S. & Titze I.R. 1997. Conversion of a head-mounted microphone signal into calibrated SPL units. J Voice, 11, 417–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods D.L., Yund E.W., Herron T.J. et al. 2010. Consonant identification in consonant-vowel-consonant syllables in speech-spectrum noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 127, 1609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yrttiaho S., Tiitinen H., May P.J., Leino S. & Alku P. 2008. Cortical sensitivity to periodicity of speech sounds. J Acoust Soc Am, 123, 2191–2199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young E.D. 2008. Neural representation of spectral and temporal information in speech. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 363, 923–945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zatorre R.J., Perry D.W., Beckett Westbury C.F. & Evans A.C. 1998. Functional anatomy of musical processing in listeners with absolute pitch and relative pitch. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 95, 3172–3177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar