931
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Simulated learning environment (SLE) in audiology education: A systematic review

, , &
Pages 881-888 | Received 23 Oct 2014, Accepted 25 May 2015, Published online: 22 Jul 2015

References

  • American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. 2014. ASHA - Certified Personnel-to-Population Ratios [online]. Available: http://www.asha.org/Research/ASHA-Certified-Personnel-to-Population-Ratios.
  • American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA). 2012. 2012 Standards and Implementation Procedures for the Certificate of Clinical Competence in Audiology [online]. Available: http://www.asha.org/Certification/2012-Audiology-Certification-Standards/#sthash.k5UtkBU5.dpuf [accessed 13 August 2014].
  • Audiology Australia. 2014. Members of Audiology Australia [online]. Available: http://www.audiology.asn.au/index.cfm/members/overseas-applicants.
  • Bach M., Stegmaier J. & Rover J. 1984. A versatile simulator of evoked potentials. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 57, 97–8.
  • Bingham A.L., Sen S., Finn L.A. & Cawley M.J. 2015. Retention of advanced cardiac life support knowledge and skills following high-fidelity mannequin simulation training. Am J Pharm Educ, 79, 12.
  • Botezatu M., Hult H., Tessma M.K. & Fors U.G.H. 2010. Virtual patient simulation for learning and assessment: Superior results in comparison with regular course exams. Medical Teacher, 32, 845–850.
  • Bressmann T. & Brophy A.E. 2012. Use of simulated patients for a student learning experience on managing difficult patient behaviour in speech-language pathology contexts. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14, 165–173.
  • Butter J., Mcgaghie W.C., Cohen E.R., Kaye M. & Wayne D.B. 2010. Simulation-based mastery learning improves cardiac auscultation skills in medical students. J Gen Intern Med, 25, 780–85.
  • Cant R.P. & Cooper S.J. 2010. Simulation-based learning in nurse education: Systematic review. J Adv Nurs, 66, 3–15.
  • Chen P.T., Cheng H.W., Yen C.R., Yin I.W., Huang Y.C. et al. 2008. Instructor-based real-time multimedia medical simulation to update concepts of difficult airway management for experienced airway practitioners. J Chin Med Assoc, 71, 174–9.
  • Cook D.A. 2014. How much evidence does it take? A cumulative meta-analysis of outcomes of simulation-based education. Medical Education, 48, 750–760.
  • Cook D.A., Hatala R., Brydges R., Zendejas B., Szostek J.H. et al. 2011. Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA, 306, 978–88.
  • Crofts J.F., Bartlett C., Ellis D., Winter C., Donald F. et al. 2008. Patient-actor perception of care: A comparison of obstetric emergency training using manikins and patient-actors. Quality Safety in Health Care, 17, 20–24.
  • Crowe M. 2013. Crowe critical appraisal tool (CCAT).
  • Crowe M., Sheppard L. & Campbell A. 2011. Comparison of the effects of using the Crowe critical appraisal tool vs. informal appraisal in assessing health research: A randomized trial. International Journal of Evidence based-Healthcare, 9, 444–449.
  • Crowe M., Sheppard L. & Campbell A. 2012. Reliability analysis for a proposed critical appraisal tool demonstrated value for diverse research designs. J Clin Epidemiol, 65, 375–83.
  • Dinsmore B.F., Bohnert C. & Preminger J.E. 2013. Standardized patients in audiology: A proposal for a new method of evaluating clinical competence. J Am Acad Audiol, 24, 372–392.
  • Durham J.A., Thelin J.W., Muenchen R.A. & Halpin C.F. 1994. Evaluation of a behavioral audiometry simulator for teaching visual reinforcement audiometry. J Am Acad Audiol, 5, 417–25.
  • Dzulkarnain A.a.A., Wan Mhdpandi W.M., Wilson W.J., Bradley A.P. & Sapian F. 2014. A preliminary investigation into the use of an auditory brainstem response (ABR) simulator for training audiology students in waveform analysis. Int J Audiol, 53, 514–521.
  • English K., Kooper R. & Bratt G. 2004. Informing parents of their child's hearing loss: “Breaking bad news”. Guidelines for audiologists. Audiology Today, 16, 10–12.
  • English K., Naeve-Velguth S., Rall E., Uyehara-Isono J. & Pittman A. 2007. Development of an instrument to evaluate audiologic counseling skills. J Am Acad Audiol, 18, 675–687.
  • Gaba D.M. 2004. The future vision of simulation in health care. Qual Saf Health Care, 13.
  • Gal G.B., Weiss E.I., Gafni N. & Ziv A. 2011. Preliminary assessment of faculty and student perception of a haptic virtual reality simulator for training dental manual dexterity. J Dent Educ, 75, 496–504.
  • Gordon J.A., Shaffer D.W., Raemer D.B., Pawlowski J., Hurford W.E. et al. 2006. A randomized controlled trial of simulation-based teaching vs. traditional instruction in medicine: A pilot study among clinical medical students. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 11, 33–39.
  • Gordon J.A., Wilkerson W.M., Shaffer D.W. & Armstrong E.G. 2001. ‘Practicing’ medicine without risk: Students’ and educators’ responses to high-fidelity patient simulation. Academic Medicine, 76, 469–472.
  • Hampson S.J. & Cantrell S. 2014. Does the use of standardized patients in maternal-newborn simulation increase student confidence prior to entering the clinical setting? Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 43S1, 48.
  • Higgins J. & Green S. 2011. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 5.1.0, The Cochrane Collaboration.
  • Hill A.E., Davidson B.J. & Theodoros D.G. 2013. Speech-language pathology students’ perceptions of a standardized patient clinic. Journal of Allied Health, 42, 84–91.
  • Huang G.C., Sacks H., Devita M., Reynolds R., Gammon W. et al. 2012. Characteristics of simulation activities at North American medical schools and teaching hospitals. Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare, 7, 329–333.
  • Irvine S. & Martin J. 2014. Bridging the gap: From simulation to clinical practice. Clin Teach, 11, 94–8.
  • Issenberg S.B., Mcgaghie W.C., Petrusa E.R., Gordon D.L. & Scalese R.J. 2005. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: A BEME systematic review. Medical Teacher, 27, 10–28.
  • Jenson C. & Forsyth D. 2012. Virtual reality simulation: Using three-dimensional technology to teach nursing students. Computers Informatics Nursing, 30, 312–318.
  • Kaddaura M.A. 2010. New graduate nurses’ perceptions of the effects of clinical simulation on their critical thinking, learning, and confidence. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 21, 506–516.
  • Kaf W.A., Masterson C.G., Dion N., Berg S.L. & Abdelhakiem M.K. 2013. Optimizing otoscopy competency in audiology students through supplementary otoscopy training. J Am Acad Audiol, 24, 859–866.
  • Kaplan R. & Ozdamar O. 1987. Microprocessor-based auditory brainstem response (ABR) simulator. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 25, 560–66.
  • Karakus A., Duran L., Yavuz Y., Altintop L. & Caliskan F. 2014. Computer-based simulation training in emergency medicine designed in the light of malpractice cases. BMC Med Educ, 14, 155.
  • Kim J.H., Kim W.O., Min K., Yang J.Y. & Nam Y.T. 2002. Learning by computer simulation does not lead to better test performance than textbook study in the diagnosis and treatment of dysrhythmias. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, 14, 395–400.
  • Kompis M., Steffen P., Caversaccio M., Brugger U. & Oesch I. 2012. A multilingual audiometer simulator software for training purposes. Acta Otolaryngol, 132, 428–33.
  • Kusumoto N., Sohmura T., Yamada S., Wakabayashi K., Nakamura T. et al. 2006. Application of virtual reality force feedback haptic device for oral implant surgery. Clin Oral Implants Res, 17, 708–13.
  • Lapkin S., Levett-Jones T., Bellchambers H. & Fernandez R. 2010. Effectiveness of patient simulation manikins in teaching clinical reasoning skills to undergraduate nursing students: A systematic review. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 6, e207–e222.
  • Lieberth A.K. & Martin D.R. 2005. The instructional effectiveness of a web-based audiometry simulator. J Am Acad Audiol, 16, 79–84.
  • Macbean N., Theodoros D., Davidson B. & Hill A.E. 2013. Simulated learning environments in speech-language pathology: An Australian response. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15, 345–357.
  • Malaysia Quality Assurance 2010. Program standard for audiology.
  • Maran N.J. & Glavin R.J. 2003. Low- to high-fidelity simulation: A continuum of medical education? Medical Education, 37, 22–28.
  • Mcgaghie W.C., Issenberg S.B., Cohen E.R., Barsuk J.H. & Wayne D.B. 2011. Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence. Academic Medicine, 86, 706–711.
  • Mounsey A.L., Bovbjerg V., White L. & Gazewood J. 2006. Do students develop better motivational interviewing skills through role-play with standardized patients or with student colleagues? Medical Education, 40, 775–80.
  • Ng S.L. 2013. Theory and research in audiology education: Understanding and representing complexity through informed methodological decisions. J Am Acad Audiol, 24, 344–353.
  • Scalese R.J., Obeso V.T. & Issenberg S.B. 2008. Simulation technology for skills training and competency assessment in medical education. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 23 Suppl 1, 46–49.
  • Seybert A.L. & Barton C.M. 2007. Simulation-based learning to teach blood pressure assessment to doctor of pharmacy students. Am J Pharm Educ, 71, 48.
  • Seybert A.L., Laughlin K.K., Benedict N.J., Barton C.M. & Rea R.S. 2006. Pharmacy student response to patient-simulation mannequins to teach performance-based pharmacotherapeutics. Am J Pharm Educ, 70, 48.
  • Slosberg R.M. & Levitt H. 1978. Computer applications in clinical training. Journal of Communication Disorders, 11, 279–92.
  • Steadman R.H., Coates W.C., Huang Y.M., Matevosian R., Larmon B.R. et al. 2006. Simulation-based training is superior to problem-based learning for the acquisition of critical assessment and management skills. Critical Care of Medicine, 34, 151–57.
  • Stegenthaler B.M. & Mitzel H.E. 1969. The development and evaluation of a computer based audiometer trainer. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, USA.
  • Strong J., Hughes C., Wilson W., Arnott W., Isles R. et al. 2012. Perceptions of feedback among undergraduate and postgraduate students of four health science disciplines. The Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice, 10, 1–8.
  • Subramanian A., Timberlake M., Mittakanti H., Lara M. & Brandt M. L. 2012. Novel educational approach for medical students: Improved retention rates using interactive medical software compared with traditional lecture-based format. J Surg Educ, 69, 253–36.
  • Ten Eyck R.P., Tews M. & Ballester J. M. 2009. Improved medical student satisfaction and test performance with a simulation-based emergency medicine curriculum: A randomized controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med, 54, 684–91.
  • Tosteruda R., Hedelin B. & Hall-Lord M. L. 2013. Nursing students” perceptions of high- and low-fidelity simulation used as learning methods. Nurse Education in Practice, 13, 262–70.
  • Ulrich D., Farra S., Smith S. & Hodgson E. 2014. The student experience using virtual reality simulation to teach decontamination. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 10, 546–53.
  • Weller J., Nestel D., Marshall S., Brooks P. & Conn J. 2012. Simulation in clinical teaching and learning. Medical Journal of Australia, 196, 594–99.
  • Wilson W.J. 2014. Personal communication.
  • Wilson W.J., Goulios H., Kapadia S., Patuzzi R., Kei J. et al. 2011. A national approach for the integration of simulated learning environments into audiology education. Australia: Health Workforce Australia.
  • Wilson W.J., Hill A., Hughes J., Sher A. & Laplante-Levesque A. 2010. Student audiologists’ impressions of a simulation training program. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Audiology, 32, 19–30.
  • Yeh S.C., Lee S.H., Chan R.C., Chen S. & Rizzo A. 2014. A virtual reality system integrated with robot-assisted haptics to simulate pinch-grip task: Motor ingredients for the assessment in chronic stroke. NeuroRehabilitation, 35, 435–49.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.