The effects of frequency lowering on speech perception in noise with adult hearing-aid users

References

• Alexander, J.M. 2012. Nonlinear frequency compression: balancing start frequency and compression ratio. Presented at the 2012 meeting of the American Auditory Society.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander J.M. 2013. Individual variability in recognition of frequency-lowered speech. Semin Hear, 34, 89–109.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander J.M., Kopun J. & Stelmachowicz P.G. 2014. Effects of frequency compression and frequency transposition on fricative and affricate perception in listeners with normal hearing and mild to moderate hearing loss. Ear Hear, 35, 519–532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auriemmo J., Kuk F., Lau C., Marshall S., Thiele N. et al. 2009. Effect of linear frequency transposition on speech recognition and production of school-age children. J Am Acad Audiol, 20, 289–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler R.A., Cole W. & Wu Y.H. 2011. Driving and audibility index for frequency lowered hearing aids. Poster presented at the 2011 meeting of the American Auditory Society.
   Google Scholar
• Bentler R.A., Walker E., McCreery R., Arenas R.M. & Roush P. 2014. Nonlinear frequency compression in hearing aids: impact on speech and language development. Ear Hear, 35, e143–e152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohnert A., Nyffeler M. & Keilmann A. 2010. Advantages of a non-linear frequency compression algorithm in noise. . Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 267, 1045–1053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand T. & Kollmeier B. 2002. Efficient adaptive procedures for threshold and concurrent slope estimates for psychophysics and speech intelligibility tests. J Acoust Soc Am, 111, 2801–2810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridges J.F.P., Lataille A.T., Buttorff C., White S. & Niparko J.K. 2012. Consumer preferences for hearing aid attributes: a comparison of rating and conjoint analysis methods. Trends Amplif, 16, 40–48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cord, M., Brungart, D., Walden, T. & Cohen, J. 2013. Sound-field evaluation of commercially-available frequency-lowering hearing aids. Poster presented at the 2013 International Hearing Aid Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Dawes P., Munro K., Kalluri S. & Edwards B. 2013. Acclimatization to hearing aids. Ear Hear, 35, 203–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galster J.A., Valentine S., Dundas A. & Fitz K. 2011. Spectral IQ: Audibly improving access to high-frequency sounds. Starkey Laboratories, Retrieved 9 September 2014. http://www.spectraliq.com/pdfs/spectral-iq-wht-paper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Glista D. & Scollie S. 2009. Modified verification approaches for frequency lowering devices. Retrieved from Audiology Online 15 August 2014. http://www.audiologyonline.com/articles/modified-verification-approaches-for-frequency-871
   Google Scholar
• Glista D., Scollie S., Bagatto M., Seewald R., Parsa V., et al. 2009. Evaluation of nonlinear frequency compression: clinical outcomes. Int J Audiol, 48, 632–644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glista D., Scollie S. & Sulkers J. 2012. Perceptual acclimatization post nonlinear frequency compression hearing aid fitting in older children. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 55, 1765–1787.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gou J., Smith J., Valero J. & Rubio I. 2011. The effect of frequency transposition on speech perception in adolescents and young adults with profound hearing loss. Deafness Educ Int, 13, 17–33.
   Google Scholar
• Hochmuth S., Brand T., Zokoll M., Castro F., Wardenga N. et al. 2012. A Spanish matrix sentence test for assessing speech reception thresholds in noise. Int J Audiol, 51, 536–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kochkin S. 2002. Consumers rate improvements sought in hearing instruments. Hear Rev, 9, 18–22.
   Google Scholar
• Kreisman B., Carroll R., Zokoll M., Warzybok A., Allen P. et al. 2013. Design, optimization and evaluation of an American English Matrix Sentence Test in Noise. Presented at the 2014 American Academy of Audiology Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Kreisman B., Mazevski A., Schum D. & Sockalingam R. 2010. Improvements in speech understanding with wireless binaural broadband digital hearing instruments in adults with sensorineural hearing loss. Trends Amplif, 14, 3–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuk F. & Baekgaard L. 2009. Considerations in fitting hearing aids with extended bandwidths. Hear Rev, 16, 32–38.
   Google Scholar
• Kuk F., Keenan D., Korhonen P. & Lau C. 2009. Efficacy of linear frequency transposition on consonant identification in quiet and in noise. J Am Acad Audiol, 20, 465–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCreery R.W., Venediktov R.A., Coleman J.J. & Leech H.M. 2012. An evidence-based systematic review of frequency lowering in hearing aids for school-age children with hearing loss. Am J Audiol, 21, 313–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCreery R.W., Alexander J., Brennan M.A., Hoover B., Kopun J. et al. 2014. The influence of audibility on speech recognition with nonlinear frequency compression for children and adults with hearing loss. Ear Hear, 35, 440–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCreery R.W., Brennan M.A., Hoover B., Kopun J. & Stelmachowicz P.G. 2013. Maximizing audibility and speech recognition with nonlinear frequency compression by estimating audible bandwidth. Ear Hear, 34, e24–e27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott H.J. 2011. A technical comparison of digital frequency lowering algorithms available in two current hearing aids. PLoS One, 6, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott H. & Dean M. 2000. Speech perception with steeply sloping hearing loss: effects of frequency transposition. Br J Audiol, 34, 353–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B. 2004. Dead regions in the cochlea: conceptual foundations, diagnosis and clinical applications. Ear Hear, 25, 98–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricketts T., Dittberner A.B. & Johnson E.E. 2008. High frequency amplification and sound quality in listeners with normal through moderate hearing loss. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 51, 160–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson J.D., Baer T. & Moore B.C.J. 2007. Using transposition to improve consonant discrimination and detection for listeners with severe high frequency hearing loss. Int J Audiol, 46, 293–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silberer A.B., Bentler R. & Wu Y. 2015. The importance of high-frequency audibility with and without visual cues on speech recognition for listeners with normal hearing. Int J Audiol, 54, 865–872.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson A., Hersbach A. & McDermott H.J. 2005. Improvements in speech perception with an experimental nonlinear frequency compression hearing device. Int J Audiol, 44, 281–292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson A., Hersbach A. & McDermott H. 2006. Frequency-compression outcomes in listeners with steeply sloping audiograms. Int J Audiol, 45, 619–629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza P.E., Arehart K.H., Kates J.M., Groghan N.B.H. & Gehani N. 2013. Exploring the limits of frequency lowering. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 56, 1349–1363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stelmachowicz P.G., Lewis D.E., Choi S. & Hoover B. 2007. The effect of stimulus bandwidth on auditory skills in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children. Ear Hear, 28, 483–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stelmachowicz P., Nishi K., Choi S., Lewis D., Hoover B. et al. 2008. Effects of stimulus bandwidth on the imitation of ish fricatives by normal-hearing children. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 51, 1369–1380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner C., Humes L., Bentler R. & Cox R. 1996. A review of past research on changes in hearing aid benefit over time. Ear Hear, 17, 14S–28S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinay Moore B.C. 2007. Prevalence of dead regions in subjects with sensorineural hearing hoss. Ear Hear, 28, 231–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagener K., Brand T. & Kollmeier B. 1999. Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Satztestes für die deutsche Sprache Teil III: Evaluation des Oldenbruger Satztestes (in German). (Development and evaluation of a German sentence test - Part III: Evaluation of the Oldenburg sentence test). Z Audiol, 38, 86–95.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe J., John A., Schafer E., Nyffeler M., Boretzki M. et al. 2010. Evaluation of nonlinear frequency compression for school-age children with moderate to moderately severe hearing loss. . J Am Acad Audiol, 21, 618–628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe J., John A., Schafer E., Nyffeler M., Boretzki M. et al. 2011. Long-term effects of non-linear frequency compression for children with moderate hearing loss. Int J Audiol, 50, 396–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Working Group on Speech Understanding and Aging. 1988. Speech Understanding and Aging (Committee in Hearing, Bioacoustics, Biomechanics, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education) National Research Council, Washington, DC 20418.
   Google Scholar
• Wright B. & Zhang Y. 2009. A review of the generalization of auditory learning. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 364, 301–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar