Nonlinear heart rate variability measures under electromagnetic fields produced by GSM cellular phones

References

• Acharya RU, Kannathal N, Sing OW, Ping LY, Chua T. 2004. Heart rate analysis in normal subjects of various age groups. BioMed Eng OnLine. 3 11: 24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahamed VI, Karthick NG, Joseph PK. 2008. Effect of mobile phone radiation on heart rate variability. Comput Biol Med. 38 6: 709–712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrzejak R, Poreba R, Poreba M, Derkacz A, Skalik R, Gac P, Beck B, Steinmetz-Beck A, Pilecki W. 2008. The influence of the call with a mobile phone on heart rate variability parameters in healthy volunteers. Ind Health. 46 4: 409–417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker AT, Jackson PR, Parry H, Coulton LA, Cook GG, Wood SM. 2007. The effect of GSM and TETRA mobile handset signals on blood pressure, catechol levels and heart rate variability. Bioelectromagnetics. 28 6: 433–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barutcu I, Esen AM, Kaya D, Turkmen M, Karakaya O, Saglam M, Melek M, . 2011. Do mobile phones pose a potential risk to autonomic modulation of the heart?. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 34 11: 1511–1514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braune S, Riedel A, Schulte-Moning J, Raczek J. 2002. Influence of a radiofrequency electromagnetic field on cardiovascular and hormonal parameters of the autonomic nervous system in healthy individuals. Radiat Res. 158:352–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braune S, Wrocklage C, Raczek J, Gailus T, Lücking CH. 1998. Resting blood pressure increase during exposure to radio-frequency electromagnetic field. The Lancet. 351:1857–1858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CENELEC. 2002. Standard EN 50361:2001. Basic standard for the measurement of Specific Absorption Rate related to human exposure to electromagnetic fields from mobile phones (300 MHz–3 GHz). Brussels: European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• EFHRAN Deliverable Report D2 (2012). Risk analysis of human exposure to electromagnetic fields (revised). October 2012. Available at http://www.efhran.polimi.it/dissemination.html.
   Google Scholar
• Ewing DJ, Martyn CN, Young RJ, Clarke BF. 1985. The value of cardiovascular autonomic function tests: 10 years experience in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 8:491–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faust O, Acharya UR, Nergui M, Ghista DN, Cattopadhyay S, Joseph P, Ahamed T, Tay D. 2011. Effects of mobile phone radiation on cardiac health. J Mech Med Biol. 11 5: 1241–1253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberger AL, Amaral LAN, Hausdorff JM, Ivanov P, Peng CK, Stanley HE. 2002. Fractal dynamics in physiology: alterations with disease and aging. PNAS. 99-S1:2466–2472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilborn RC. 1994. Chaos and nonlinear dynamics. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huber R, Schuderer J, Graf T, Jütz K, Borbély AA, Kuster N, Achermann P. 2003. Radio frequency electromagnetic field exposure in humans: Estimations of SAR distribution in the brain, effects on sleep and heart rate. Bioelectromagnetics. 24:262–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombardi F. 2002. Clinical implication of present physiological understanding of HRV components. Card Electrophysiol Rev.. 6:245–249.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parazzini M, Ravazzani P, Tognola G, Thuroczy G, Molnar FB, Sacchettini A, Ardesi G, Mainardi LT. 2007. Electromagnetic fields produced by GSM cellular phones and heart rate variability. Bioelectromagnetics.. 28 2: 122–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng CK, Havlin S, Stanley HE, Goldberger AL. 1995. Quantification of scaling exponents and crossover phenomena in nonstationary heartbeat time series. Chaos. 5:82–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pincus SM. 1991. Approximate entropy as a measure of system complexity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 88:2297–2301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pikkujamsa SM, Makikallio TH, Sourander LB, Raiha IJ, Puukka P, Skytta J, Peng CK, . 1999. Cardiac interbeat interval dynamics from childhood to senescence: comparison of conventional and new measures based on fractals and chaos theory. Circulation. 100:393–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porta A, Baselli G, Liberati D, Montano N, Cogliati C, Gnecchi-Ruscone T, Malliani A, Cerutti S. 1998. Measuring regularity by means of a corrected conditional entropy in sympathetic outflow. Biol. Cybern. 78:71–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Recommendation EU. 1999. Council recommendation of 12 July 1999 on the limitation of exposure of the general public to electromagnetic fields (0 Hz to 300 GHz) (1999/519/EC). OJEC. L199:59–70.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenstein M, Collins J, De Luca C. 1993. A practical method for calculating largest Lyapunov exponents from small data sets. Physica D. 65:117–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tahvanainen K, Niño J, Halonen P, Kuusela T, Laitinen T, Länsimies E, Hartikainen J, . 2004. Cellular phone use does not acutely affect blood pressure or heart rate of humans. Bioelectromagnetics. 25:73–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Task Force. 1996. Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Eur. Heart. J.. 17:354–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulppo MP, Makikallio TH, Takala TES, Seppanen T, Huikuri HV. 1996. Quantitative beat-to-beat analysis of heart rate dynamics during exercise. Am J Physiol. 271:H244–H252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umetani K, Singer DH, McCraty R, Atkinson M. 1998. Twenty-four hour time domain heart rate variability and heart rate: relations to age and gender over nine decades. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.. 31:593–601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang AC, Hseu SS, Yien HW, Goldberger AL, Peng CK. 2003. Linguistic analysis of the human heartbeat using frequency and rank order statistics. Phys Rev Lett.. 90 10: 108103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz D, Yildiz M. 2010. Analysis of the mobile phone effect on the heart rate variability by using the largest Lyapunov exponent. J Med Syst.. 34 6: 1097–1103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar