192
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Irritant contact dermatitis: effect of age

, , , &
Pages 138-143 | Received 07 Jul 2011, Accepted 24 Aug 2011, Published online: 04 Oct 2011

References

  • Weltfriend S, Maibach HI. Irritant dermatitis: clinical heterogeneity and contributing factors. In: Zhai H, Wilhelm KP, Maibach HI, eds. Dermatotoxicology, 7th edition. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2008, 125–138.
  • Ale IS, Maibach HI. Mechanisms in irritant and allergic contact dermatitis. In: Zhai H, Wilhelm KP, Maibach HI, eds. Dermatotoxicology, 7th edition. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2008, 159–167.
  • Chew A-L, Maibach HI. Classification of irritant contact dermatitis. In: Zhai H, Wilhelm KP, Maibach HI, eds. Dermatotoxicology, 7th edition. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2008, 923–926.
  • Berardesca E, Distante F. The modulation of skin irritation. Contact Derm 1994;31:281–287.
  • Wilhelm KP. Irritant dermatitis: experimental aspects. Curr Probl Dermatol 1995;23:144–151.
  • Wilhelm KP, Surber C, Maibach HI. Quantification of sodium lauryl sulfate irritant dermatitis in man: comparison of four techniques: skin color reflectance, transepidermal water loss, laser Doppler flow measurement and visual scores. Arch Dermatol Res 1989;281:293–295.
  • Agner T, Serup J. Seasonal variation of skin resistance to irritants. Br J Dermatol 1989;121:323–328.
  • Agner T. Noninvasive measuring methods for the investigation of irritant patch test reactions. A study of patients with hand eczema, atopic dermatitis and controls. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh) 1992;173:1–26.
  • Lee CH, Maibach HI. The sodium lauryl sulfate model: an overview. Contact Derm 1995;33:1–7.
  • Zhai H, Maibach HI. Skin occlusion and irritant and allergic contact dermatitis: an overview. Contact Derm 2001;44:201–206.
  • Branco N, Lee I, Zhai H, Maibach HI. Long-term repetitive sodium lauryl sulfate-induced irritation of the skin: an in vivo study. Contact Derm 2005;53:278–284.
  • Kartono F, Maibach HI. Irritants in combination with synergistic or additive effect on skin response: overview of tandem irritation studies. In: Zhai H, Wilhelm KP, Maibach HI, eds. Dermatotoxicology, 7th edition. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2008, 959–966.
  • Patil S, Maibach HI. Effect of age and sex on the elicitation of irritant contact dermatitis. Contact Derm 1994;30:257–264.
  • Harvell JD, Maibach HI. Percutaneous absorption and inflammation in aged skin: a review. J Am Acad Dermatol 1994;31:1015–1021.
  • Robinson MK. Population differences in skin structure and physiology and the susceptibility to irritant and allergic contact dermatitis: implications for skin safety testing and risk assessment. Contact Derm 1999;41:65–79.
  • Farage MA, Miller KW, Berardesca E, Maibach HI. Clinical implications of aging skin: cutaneous disorders in the elderly. Am J Clin Dermatol 2009;10:73–86.
  • Diepgen TL, Coenraads PJ. The epidemiology of occupational contact dermatitis. In: Kanerva L, Elsner P, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI, eds. Handbook of Occupational Dermatology, Berlin: Springer, 2000, 3–16.
  • Wigger-Alberti W, Elsner P. Contact dermatitis due to irritation. In: Kanerva L, Elsner P, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI, eds. Handbook of Occupational Dermatology, Berlin: Springer, 2000, 99–110.
  • Tsai T-F. Water: Is it an Irritant? In: Zhai H, Wilhelm KP, Maibach HI, eds. Dermatotoxicology, 7th edition. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2008, 279–282.
  • Fluhr JW, Darlenski R, Angelova-Fischer I, Tsankov N, Basketter D. Skin irritation and sensitization: mechanisms and new approaches for risk assessment. 1. Skin irritation. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2008;21:124–135.
  • Chew AL, Maibach HI, eds. Irritant Dermatitis. Springer: Berlin, 2006.
  • Rizwan M, Aqil M, Talegaonkar S, Azeem A, Sultana Y, Ali A. Enhanced transdermal drug delivery techniques: an extensive review of patents. Recent Pat Drug Deliv Formul 2009;3:105–124.
  • Kaestli LZ, Wasilewski-Rasca AF, Bonnabry P, Vogt-Ferrier N. Use of transdermal drug formulations in the elderly. Drugs Aging 2008;25:269–280.
  • Grove GL, Duncan S, Kligman AM. Effect of ageing on the blistering of human skin with ammonium hydroxide. Br J Dermatol 1982;107:393–400.
  • Cua AB, Wilhelm KP, Maibach HI. Cutaneous sodium lauryl sulphate irritation potential: age and regional variability. Br J Dermatol 1990;123:607–613.
  • Elsner P, Wilhelm D, Maibach HI. Sodium lauryl sulfate-induced irritant contact dermatitis in vulvar and forearm skin of premenopausal and postmenopausal women. J Am Acad Dermatol 1990;23:648–652.
  • Elsner P, Wilhelm D, Maibach HI. Irritant effect of a model surfactant on the human vulva and forearm. Age-related differences. J Reprod Med 1990;35:1035–1039.
  • Elsner P, Wilhelm D, Maibach HI. Effect of low-concentration sodium lauryl sulfate on human vulvar and forearm skin. Age-related differences. J Reprod Med 1991;36:77–81.
  • Schwindt DA, Wilhelm KP, Miller DL, Maibach HI. Cumulative irritation in older and younger skin: a comparison. Acta Derm Venereol 1998;78:279–283.
  • Robinson MK. Population differences in acute skin irritation responses. Race, sex, age, sensitive skin and repeat subject comparisons. Contact Derm 2002;46:86–93.
  • Bowman JP, Kligman AM, Stoudemayer T, Nicholson J. Effects of age on human cumulative irritation responses. J Cosmet Sci 2005;56:213–218.
  • Marrakchi S, Maibach HI. Sodium lauryl sulfate-induced irritation in the human face: regional and age-related differences. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2006;19:177–180.
  • Marrakchi S, Maibach HI. Functional map and age-related differences in the human face: nonimmunologic contact urticaria induced by hexyl nicotinate. Contact Derm 2006;55:15–19.
  • Roskos KV, Maibach HI. Percutaneous absorption and age. Implications for therapy. Drugs Aging 1992;2:432–449.
  • Epstein E. Contact dermatitis in children. Pediatr Clin North Am 1971;18:839–852.
  • Peters L, Marriott M, Mukerji B, Indra P, Iyer JV, Roy A et al. The effect of population diversity on skin irritation. Contact Derm 2006;55:357–363.
  • Wesley NO, Maibach HI. Racial (ethnic) differences in skin properties: the objective data. Am J Clin Dermatol 2003;4:843–860.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.