Preliminary evaluation of military, commercial and novel skin decontamination products against a chemical warfare agent simulant (methyl salicylate)

References

• Okumura T, Takasu N, Ishimatsu S, et al. Report on 640 victims of the Tokyo subway sarin attack. Ann Emerg Med 1996;28:129–135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chilcott RP. CBRN contamination. In: Ayers J, Harrison R, Nichols G, eds. Textbook of environmental medicine. London: Hodder Arnold; 2010:475–486
   Google Scholar
• Chilcott RP. Managing mass casualties and decontamination. Environ Int 2014;72C:37–45
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Idson B. Hydration and percutaneous absorption. Curr Probl Dermatol 1978;7:132–141
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moody RP, Maibach HI. Skin decontamination: importance of the wash-in effect. Food Chem Toxicol 2006;44:1783–1788
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moody RP, Nadeau B. In vitro dermal absorption of two commercial formulations of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid dimethylamine (2,4-D amine) in rat, guinea pig and human skin. Toxicol In Vitro 1997;11:251–262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai H, Ebel JP, Chatterjee R, Stone KJ, et al. Hydration vs. skin permeability to nicotinates in man. Skin Res Technol 2002;8:13–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riviere JE, Smith CE, Budsaba K, et al. Use of methyl salicylate as a simulant to predict the percutaneous absorption of sulfur mustard. J Appl Toxicol 2001;21:91–99
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartelt-Hunt SL, Knappe DRU, Barlaz MA. A review of chemical warfare agent simulants for the study of environmental behavior. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 2008;38:112–136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman RJ. Chemical agent simulant release from clothing following vapor exposure. Acad Emerg Med 2010;17:221–224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao P, King WP, Shaffer R. Review of chamber design requirements for testing of personal protective clothing ensembles. J Occup Environ Hyg 2007;4:562–571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moody RP, Akram M, Dickson E, Chu I. In vitro dermal absorption of methyl salicylate, ethyl parathion, and malathion: first responder safety. J Toxicol Environ Health 2007;70:985–999
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter WB, Owens JR, Wander JD. Methyl salicylate: a reactive chemical warfare agent surrogate to detect reaction with hypochlorite. Acs Appl Mater Interfaces 2011;3:4262–4267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chilcott R. Decontaminant product and method. Patent No. WO2013150317 A1. UK; 2013
   Google Scholar
• Franz TJ. Percutaneous absorption on the relevance of in vitro data. J Invest Dermatol 1975;64:190–195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. Test No. 428: skin absorption: in vitro method. OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2004
   Google Scholar
• Lin SY, Hou SJ, Hsu THS, Yeh FL. Comparisons of different animal skins with human skin in drug percutaneous penetration studies. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol 1992;14:645–654
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott RC, Walker M, Dugard PH. A comparison of the in vitro permeability properties of human and some laboratory animal skins. Int J Cosmet Sci 1986;8:189–194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbero AM, Frasch HF. Pig and guinea pig skin as surrogates for human in vitro penetration studies: a quantitative review. Toxicol In Vitro 2009;23:1–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monteiro-Riviere NA, Riviere JE. The pig as a model for cutaneous pharmacology and toxicology research. In: Shook LB, Tumbleson ME, eds. Advances in swine in biomedical research. New York: Plenum Press; 1996:425–458
   Google Scholar
• Chilcott RP, Jenner J, Hotchkiss SA, Rice P. In vitro skin absorption and decontamination of sulphur mustard: comparison of human and pig-ear skin. J Appl Toxicol 2001;21:279–283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herkenne C, Naik A, Kalia YN, et al. Pig ear skin ex vivo as a model for in vivo dermatopharmacokinetic studies in man. Pharm Res 2006;23:1850–1856
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell WMS, Burch RL. The principles of humane experimental technique. London: Methuen; 1959
   Google Scholar
• Simon GA, Maibach HI. The pig as an experimental animal model of percutaneous permeation in man: qualitative and quantitative observations – an overview. Skin Pharm Appl Skin Physiol 2000;13:229–234
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Southwell D, Barry BW, Woodford R. Variations in permeability of human-skin within and between specimens. Int J Pharm 1984;18:299–309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies DJ, Ward RJ, Heylings JR. Multi-species assessment of electrical resistance as a skin integrity marker for in vitro percutaneous absorption studies. Toxicol In Vitro 2004;18:351–358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones DR. Optimisation of aqueous decontamination methods following exposure to organophosphorous nerve agents [PhD Thesis]. University of Surrey, Guildford, UK; 2012
   Google Scholar
• El Maghraby GM, Williams AC, Barry BW. Skin delivery of 5-fluorouracil from ultradeformable and standard liposomes in-vitro. J Pharm Pharmacol 2001;53:1069–1077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott RC, Ramsey JD. Comparison of the in vivo and in vitro percutaneous absorption of a lipophilic molecule (cypermethrin, a pyrethroid insecticide). J Invest Dermatol 1987;89:142–146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau WM, Ng KW, Sakenyte K, Heard CM. Distribution of esterase activity in porcine ear skin, and the effects of freezing and heat separation. Int J Pharm 2012;433:10–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chilcott RP, Barai N, Beezer AE, et al. Inter- and intralaboratory variation of in vitro diffusion cell measurements: an international multicenter study using quasi-standardized methods and materials. J Pharm Sci 2005;94:632–638
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Sandt JJM, van Burgsteden JA, Cage S, et al. In vitro predictions of skin absorption of caffeine, testosterone, and benzoic acid: a multi-centre comparison study. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2004;39:271–281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronaugh RL, Stewart RF, Congdon ER. Methods for in vitro percutaneous absorption studies. II. Animal models for human skin. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1982;62:481–488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolland P, Bolzinger MA, Cruz C, et al. Hairy skin exposure to VX in vitro: effectiveness of delayed decontamination. Toxicol In Vitro 2013;27:358–366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Hooidonk C, Ceulen BI, Kienhuis H, Bock J. Rate of skin penetration of organophosphates measured in diffusion cells. Dev Toxicol Environ Sci 1980;8:643–646
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Misik J, Pavlikova R, Josse D, et al. In vitro skin permeation and decontamination of the organophosphorus pesticide paraoxon under various physical conditions – evidence for a wash-in effect. Toxicol Mech Method 2012;22:520–525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melot M, Pudney PDA, Williamson AM, et al. Studying the effectiveness of penetration enhancers to deliver retinol through the stratum cornum by in vivo confocal Raman spectroscopy. J Control Release 2009;138:32–39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purdon CH, Azzi CG, Zhang J, et al. Penetration enhancement of transdermal delivery—current permutations and limitations. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst 2004;21:97–132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taysse L, Daulon S, Delamanche S, et al. Skin decontamination of mustards and organophosphates: comparative efficiency of RSDL and Fuller's earth in domestic swine. Hum Exp Toxicol 2007;26:135–141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairhurst S, Maxwell SA, Scawin JW, Swanston DW. Skin effects of trichothecenes and their amelioration by decontamination. Toxicology 1987;46:307–319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar