Lay and scientific conceptualizations of impaired control at electronic gambling machines

References

• American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders3rd. Author, Washington, DC 1980
   Google Scholar
• Blaszczynski A, Nower L. A pathways model of problem and pathological gambling. Addiction 2002; 97: 487–499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantinotti M, Ladouceur R, Tavares H. Impaired control: A look at the laying brick of pathological gambling. Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria 2007; 29: 203–204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castellani B. Pathological gambling: The making of a medical problem. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY 2000
   Google Scholar
• Chevalier S, Hamel D, Ladouceur R, Jacques C, Allard D, Sévigny S. Comportements de jeu et jeu pathologique selon le type de jeu au Québec en 2002 [Gambling behaviors and pathological gambling according to the type of gambling activity in the Québec province in 2002]. Institut national de santé publique du Québec and Université Laval, Montréal and Québec 2004
   Google Scholar
• Cohen P, Cohen J. The clinician's illusion. Archives of General Psychiatry 1984; 41: 1178–1182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen PDA. Is the addiction doctor the voodoo priest of Western man?. Addiction Research 2000; 8: 589–598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corless T, Dickerson M. Gamblers’ self-perceptions of the determinants of impaired control. British Journal of Addiction 1989; 84: 1527–1537
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Custer RL, Custer LF. Characteristics of the recovering compulsive gambler: A survey of 150 members of Gamblers Anonymous. Paper presented at the Annual Conference on Gambling. Reno, NV December, 1978
   Google Scholar
• D’Oronzio JC. The integration of health and human rights: An appreciation of Jonathan M. Mann. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2001; 10: 231–240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies JB. Reasons and causes: Understanding substance users’ explanations for their behaviour. Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental 1996; 11: S39–S48
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davison ML, Richards SP, Rounds Jr JB. Multidimensional scaling in counseling research and practice. Journal of Counseling and Development 1986; 65: 178–184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Castro V, Fong T, Rosenthal RJ, Tavares H. A comparison of craving and emotional states between pathological gamblers and alcoholics. Addictive Behaviors 2007; 32: 1555–1564
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delfabbro P. The stubborn logic of regular gamblers: Obstacles and dilemmas in cognitive gambling research. Journal of Gambling Studies 2004; 20: 1–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickerson M. The evolving contribution of gambling research to addiction theory. Addiction 2003a; 98: 709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickerson M. Exploring the limits of “responsible gambling”: Harm minimisation or consumer protection? Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the National Association for Gambling Studies, 2003b November. Melbourne, Australia
   Google Scholar
• Dickerson M, Haw J, Shepherd L. The psychological causes of problem gambling: A longitudinal study of at risk recreational EGM players. University of Western Sydney, School of Psychology, SydneyAustralia 2003
   Google Scholar
• Dickerson M, Weeks D. Controlled gambling as a therapeutic technique for compulsive gamblers. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 1979; 10: 139–141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doiron JP, Nicki RM. Epidemiology of problem gambling in Prince Edward Island: A Canadian microcosm?. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 2001; 46: 413–417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eiser JR. Social cognition and comparative substance use. Addiction controversies, DM Warburton. Harwood Academic Publishers, ChurSwitzerland 1990; 271–282
   Google Scholar
• Ellery M, Stewart SH, Loba P. Alcohol's effects on video lottery terminal (VLT) play among probable pathological and non-pathological gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies 2005; 21: 299–324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris J, Wynne H. The Canadian problem gambling index: Final report:. Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse, OttawaCanada 2001
   Google Scholar
• Fiorentine R, Hillhouse MP. When low self-efficacy is efficacious: Toward an addicted-self model of cessation of alcohol- and drug-dependent behavior. American Journal on Addictions 2003; 12: 346–364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuentes D, Tavares H, Artes R, Gorenstein C. Self-reported and neuropsychological measures of impulsivity in pathological gambling. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2006; 12: 907–912
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geis G. Pathological gambling and insanity, diminished capacity, dischargeability, and downward sentencing departures. Gaming Law Review 2004; 8: 347–360
   Google Scholar
• Glicksohn J, Naor-Ziv R, Leshem R. Impulsive decision-making: Learning to gamble wisely?. Cognition 2007; 105: 195–205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman JK, Irwin JR. Special random numbers: Beyond the illusion of control. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2006; 99: 161–174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gossop M. Compulsion, craving and conflict. Addiction controversies, DM Warburton. Harwood Academic Publishers, ChurSwitzerland 1990; 236–249
   Google Scholar
• Götestam K, Johansson A. Characteristics of gambling and problematic gambling in the Norwegian context. A DSM-IV-based telephone interview study. Addictive Behaviors 2003; 28: 189–197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goudriaan AE, Oosterlaan J, de Beurs E, van den Brink W. Psychophysiological determinants and concomitants of deficient decision making in pathological gamblers. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2006; 84: 231–239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gower JC. Statistical methods of comparing different multivariate analysis of the same data. Mathematics in the archaeological and historical sciences, FR Hodson, D Kendall, P Tautu. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh 1971; 138–149
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks VM, Meerkerk G-J, Oers HAM, Garretsen HFL. The Dutch instant lottery: Prevalence and correlates of at-risk playing. Addiction 1997; 92: 335–346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes PP, Marshall D, Sherrill C. Multidimensional analysis of fear and confidence of university women relating to crimes and dangerous situations. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 2003; 18: 33–49
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson DA. PROTEST: A PROcrustean randomisation TEST of community environment concordance. Écoscience 1995; 2: 297–303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson KM, Trochim WMK. Concept mapping as an alternative approach for the analysis of open-ended survey responses. Organizational Research Methods 2002; 5: 307–336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen KK, Lassen J, Robinson P, Sandøe P. Lay and expert perceptions of zoonotic risks: Understanding conflicting perspectives in the light of moral theory. International Journal of Food Microbiology 2005; 99: 245–255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnsen JA, Biegel DE, Shafran R. Concept mapping in mental health: Uses and adaptations. Evaluation and Program Planning 2000; 23: 67–75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunkel MA, Cook S, Meshel DS, Daughtry D, Hauenstein A. God images: A concept map. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 1999; 38: 193–202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladouceur R. Perceptions among pathological and nonpathological gamblers. Addictive Behaviors 2004; 29: 555–565
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladouceur R. Controlled gambling for pathological gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies 2005; 21: 49–57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladouceur R, Walker M. The cognitive approach to understanding and treating pathological gambling. Comprehensive clinical psychology, AS Bellack, M Hersen. Pergamon, New York 1998; 588–601
   Google Scholar
• Langer EJ. The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1975; 32: 311–328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledgerwood DM, Petry NM. Psychological experience of gambling and subtypes of pathological gamblers. Psychiatry Research 2006; 144: 17–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee C-K, Lee Y-K, Bernhard BJ, Yoon Y-S. Segmenting casino gamblers by motivation: A cluster analysis of Korean gamblers. Tourism Management 2006; 27: 856–866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lévesque M, Jean B, White D. Les conceptions du développement social: Le point de vue des acteurs [Conceptualizations of the social development: The protagonists’ viewpoint]. Fonds québécois de la recherche sur la société et la culture, Montréal 2002
   Google Scholar
• Levine HG. The discovery of addiction: Changing conceptions of habitual drunkenness in America. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 1978; 39: 143–174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linton R. Conceptualizing feminism, clarifying social science concepts. Evaluation and Program Planning 1989; 12: 25–29
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loto-Québec. For a responsible contribution. Author, Montréal 2005
   Google Scholar
• Maisto SA, Schefft BK. The constructs of craving for alcohol and loss of control drinking: Help or hindrance to research. Addictive Behaviors 1977; 2: 207–217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin CS, Fillmore MT, Chung T, Easdon CM, Miczek KA. Multidisciplinary perspectives on impaired control over substance use. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 2006; 30: 265–271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michalski GV, Cousins BJ. Differences in stakeholder perceptions about training evaluation: A concept mapping/pattern matching investigation. Evaluation and Program Planning 2000; 23: 211–230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. Gambling concepts and nomenclature. In Pathological gambling: A critical review. National Academies Press, Washington, DC 1999; 15–62
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor J, Dickerson M. Impaired control over gambling in gaming machine and off-course gamblers. Addiction 2003; 98: 53–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peres-Neto PR. (2000). PROTEST: A PROcrustean Randomization TEST. Department of Zoology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
   Google Scholar
• Peres-Neto PR, Jackson DA. How well do multivariate data sets match? The advantages of a Procrustean superimposition approach over the Mantel test. Oecologia 2001; 129: 169–178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Procrustes. Oxford english dictionary2nd. Oxford University Press, OxfordEngland 1989
   Google Scholar
• Régie des alcools, des courses et des jeux. (2004). Alcohol: Public messages. [Retrieved 2007 February 3]. Available from: http://www.racj.gouv.qc.ca
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal RJ. Pathological gambling. Psychiatric Annals 1992; 22: 72–78
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seligman MEP. Helplessness: On depression, development and death. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, CA 1975
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer HJ. The epistemology of “Addictive disease”: The Lincoln–Douglas debate. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 1987; 4: 103–113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer HJ, Kidman R. Shifting perspectives on gambling and addiction. Journal of Gambling Studies 2003; 19: 1–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sharpe L. A reformulated cognitive-behavioral model of problem gambling: A biopsychosocial perspective. Clinical Psychology Review 2002; 22: 1–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibson R. Studies in the robustness of multidimensional scaling: Procrustes statistics. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 1978; 40: 234–238
   Google Scholar
• Skinner EA. A guide to constructs of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1996; 71: 549–570
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic P. Perception of risk. Science 1987; 236: 280–285
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith GJ, Wynne HJ. VLT gambling in Alberta: A preliminary analysis (Final report). Alberta Gaming Research Institute and University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta 2004
   Google Scholar
• Sobell MB, Sobell LC. The aftermath of heresy: A response to Pendery et al.'s (1982) critique of “Individualized behavior therapy for alcoholics”. Behaviour Research & Therapy 1984; 22: 413–440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southern DM, Batterham RW, Appleby NJ, Young D, Dunt D, Guibert R. The concept mapping method. Australian Family Physician 1999; 28: S35–S40
   Google Scholar
• Springer. 2005. The Journal of Gambling Studies. [Retrived 2004 November 1] Available from www.springer.com/medicine/psychiatry/journal/10899
   Google Scholar
• Sturrock K, Rocha J. A multidimensional scaling stress evaluation table. Field Methods 2000; 12: 49–60
   Google Scholar
• Thomson Corporation. 2005. ISI Web of Knowledge 3.0 Platform. [Retrieved 2006 March 5]. Available from: www.isiknowledge.com
   Google Scholar
• Toms ML, Cummings-Hill MA, Curry DG, Cone SM. Using cluster analysis for deriving menu structures for automotive mobile multimedia applications. 2001, [Retrieved 2006 June 5] Available from: http://www.delphi.com/pdf/techpapers/2001-01-0359.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Trochim WMK (1993) The reliability of concept mapping. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association, DallasTX, November, 1993
   Google Scholar
• Trochim WMK, Milstein B, Wood BJ, Jackson S. Setting objectives for community and systems change: An application of concept mapping for planning a statewide health improvement initiative. Health Promotion Practice 2004; 5: 8–19
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turner DN, Saunders D. Medical relabeling in gamblers anonymous: The construction of an ideal member. Small Group Research 1990; 21: 59–78
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentin D, Chollet S, Abdi H. Les mots du vin: experts et novices diffèrent-ils quand ils décrivent des vins? [Words of wine: Do experts and novices differ when they describe wines?]. Corpus 2003; 2: 183–199
   Google Scholar
• Ward J. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1963; 58: 236–244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welkenhuysen-Gybels JGJ, Van de Vijver FJR. 2001. A comparison of methods for the evaluation of construct equivalence in a multigroup setting. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Statistical Association, 2001 August. Atlanta, GA
   Google Scholar
• Zogg H, Lauber C, Adjdacic-Gross V, Rössler W. Einstellung von Experten und laien gegenüber negativen Sanktionen bei psychisch Kranken [Expert's and lay attitudes towards restrictions on mentally ill people]. Psychiatrische Praxis 2003; 30: 379–383
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar