The role of packaging for consumer products: Understanding the move towards ‘plain’ tobacco packaging

References

• Adams FM, Osgood CE. A cross-cultural study of the affective meanings of color. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 1973; 4: 135–156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison RI, Uhl KP. Influences of beer brand identification on taste perceptions. Journal of Marketing Research 1964; 1: 36–39
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anon (1992). Opportunities in packaging innovation. Philip Morris. Bates No.2023162454-2023162473.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong G, Kotler P. Marketing: An introduction, 7th. Prentice Hall, New Jersey 2005
   Google Scholar
• Baht VN. Green marketing begins with green design. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 1993; 8: 26–31
   Google Scholar
• Bero L. Implications of the tobacco industry documents for public health and policy. Annual Review of Public Health 2003; 24: 267–288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloch PH. Seeking the ideal form: Product design and consumer responses. Journal of Marketing 1995; 59: 16–29
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloch PH, Brunel FF, Arnold TJ. Individual differences in the centrality of visual product aesthetics: Concept and measurement. Journal of Consumer Research 2003; 29: 551–565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottomley PA, Doyle JR. The interactive effects of colours and products on perceptions of brand logo appropriateness. Marketing Theory 2006; 6: 63–83
   Google Scholar
• British American Tobacco (2009). Modern tobacco marketing. Retrieved February 7, 2011, from http://www.bat.com/group/sites/uk__3mnfen.nsf/vwPagesWebLive/DO78BDW6?opendocument&SKN=1.
   Google Scholar
• Cancer Council Victoria (2011). Plain packaging of tobacco products: A review of the evidence. Retrieved October 4, 2011, from http://www.cancer.org.au/File/PolicyPublications/Position_statements/TCUCCVBkgrndResrchPlainPak190511ReEnd_FINAL2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• CDP (1995). Cigarette new product development. Future areas of investigation. Retrieved June 15, 2011, from http://www.tobaccopapers.com/PDFs/0001-0099/0094.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Coca-Cola (2010). The whole package. Retrieved February 15, 2011, from http://www.coca-cola.co.uk/environment/sustainable-recycling-eco-packaging.html.
   Google Scholar
• Collenette, N. (2009). Rolling with the times. Off Licence News, 10 April.
   Google Scholar
• Collenette, N. (2010). New bottle unites Heineken. Off Licence News, 10 December.
   Google Scholar
• Colquhoun Associates (1998). Qualitative research into RYO habits and attitudes. Retrieved January 23, 2011, from http://www.tobaccopapers.com/PDFs/0300-0399/0358.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Constantinides E. The marketing mix revisited: Towards the 21st century marketing. Journal of Marketing Management 2006; 22: 407–438
   Google Scholar
• Convenience Store (2011). Top launches 2010: Drinks. Convenience Store, 21 January.
   Google Scholar
• Cramphorn, S. (2001). Packaging to the rescue. Admap Magazine, December.
   Google Scholar
• Creusen MEH, Schoormans JPL. The different roles of product appearance in consumer choice. The Journal of Product Innovation Management 2005; 22: 63–81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Chernatony L. From brand vision to brand evaluation, 2nd. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford 2008
   Google Scholar
• DiFranza JR, Clark DM, Pollay RW. Cigarette package design: Opportunities for disease prevention. Tobacco Induced Diseases 2002; 1: 97–109
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Doxey J, Hammond D. Deadly in pink: The impact of female-oriented cigarette packaging among young women. Tobacco Control 2011; 20: 353–360
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, D. (2010). Luxury packaging: A touch of class. Retrieved February 7, 2011, from http://www.packagingnews.co.uk/design/new-packs/luxury-packaging-a-touch-of-class/.
   Google Scholar
• Ferraro R, Bettman JR, Chartrand TL. The power of strangers: The effect of incidental consumer brand encounters on brand choice. Journal of Consumer Research 2009; 35: 729–741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrester, S. (2010). Fashion foundation. Retrieved February 7, 2011, from http://www.vogue.co.uk/beauty/news/101022-william-tempest-olay-foundation-des.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Fournier S. Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research 1998; 24: 343–373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman B, Chapman S, Rimmer M. The case for the plain packaging of tobacco products. Addiction 2008; 103: 580–590
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garber, L.L., Burke, R.R., & Jones, J.M. (2000). The role of package color in consumer purchase consideration and choice. Working paper, Marketing Science Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Germain D, Wakefield MA, Durkin SJ. Adolescents’ perceptions of cigarette brand image: Does plain packaging make a difference. Journal of Adolescent Health 2010; 46: 385–392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, S. (2010). Markets: New looks not just for Christmas. Retrieved July 7, 2011, from http://www.packagingnews.co.uk/markets/drinks/markets-new-looks-not-just-for-christmas/.
   Google Scholar
• Grönroos C. Quo vadis, marketing? Towards a relationship marketing paradigm. Journal of Marketing Management 1994; 10: 347–360
   Google Scholar
• Grossman RP, Wisenbuilt JZ. What we know about consumers’ color choices. Journal of Marketing Practice 1999; 5: 78–88
   Google Scholar
• Hammond D, Dockrell M, Arnott D, Lee A, McNeill A. The impact of cigarette pack design on perceptions of risk among UK adult and youth: Evidence in support of plain packaging regulations. European Journal of Public Health 2009; 19: 631–637
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampshire M, Stephenson K. Packaging: Design successful packaging for specific customer groups. RotoVision, Mies 2007
   Google Scholar
• Haslam Drury Partnership (1997). Project Banjo: Evaluating the opportunity. Retrieved June 15, 2011, from http://www.tobaccopapers.com/PDFs/0400-0499/0462.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hastings, G.B., & MacFadyen, L. (2000). Keep smiling. No one’s going to die: An analysis of internal documents from the tobacco industry’s main UK advertising agencies. Centre for Tobacco Control Research and Tobacco Control Resource Centre. London: British Medical Association.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkes C. Food packaging: The medium is the message. Public Health Nutrition 2010; 13: 297–299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hise RT, McNeal JU. Effective packaging management. Business Horizons 1988; 31: 47–51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmeyr J, Rice B. Commitment-led marketing. John Wiley & sons, Chichester 2000
   Google Scholar
• Howe, R.O. (1978). Self-selling package design. AMA Forum, April, 31–32.
   Google Scholar
• Jugger, S. (1999). The power of packaging. Admap Magazine, October.
   Google Scholar
• Keller KL. Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing 1993; 57(1)1–22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller KL. Strategic brand management. Building, measuring and managing brand equity, 3rd. Pearson, New Jersey 2008
   Google Scholar
• Klimchuk MR, Krasovec SA. Packaging design: Successful product branding from concept to shelf. Wiley, New Jersey 2006
   Google Scholar
• Koten, J. (1980). Tobacco marketers’ success formula: make cigarets [sic] in smoker’s own image. Wall Street Journal, 29 February.
   Google Scholar
• Limon Y, Kahle LR, Orth UR. Package design as a communications vehicle in cross-cultural values shopping. Journal of International Marketing 2009; 17: 30–57
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löfgren M. Winning at the first and second moments of truth: An exploratory study. Managing Service Quality 2005; 15: 102–115
   Google Scholar
• Lowe-Howard Spink (1996). Creative brief. Retrieved July 7, 2011, from http://www.tobaccopapers.com/PDFs/0400-0499/0486.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lowe-Howard Spink (1997). Creative brief. Retrieved March 15, 2011, from http://www.tobaccopapers.com/PDFs/0400-0499/0487.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• M&C Saatchi (1996). Sovereign discussion papers. Retrieved October 4, 2011 from http://www.tobaccopapers.com/PDFs/0500-0599/0561.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Madden TJ, Hewett K, Roth MS. Managing images in different cultures: A cross national study of color meanings and preferences. Journal of International Marketing 2000; 8: 90–107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mawditt N. Putting pack opportunities into the frame. World Tobacco 2006; 212: 36–37
   Google Scholar
• McNeal JU, Ji MF. Children’s visual memory of packaging. Journal of Consumer Marketing 2003; 20: 400–427
   Google Scholar
• Meyers HM, Lubliner MJ. The marketer’s guide to successful packaging design. NTC Business Books, Lincolnwood 1998
   Google Scholar
• Moodie, C., Hastings, G., & Ford, A. (2009). A brief review of plain packaging research for tobacco products. Report prepared for UK Department of Health. Stirling: Centre for Tobacco Control Research, University of Stirling.
   Google Scholar
• Moodie C, Ford A. Young adult smokers’ perceptions of cigarette pack innovation, pack colour and plain packaging. Australasian Marketing Journal 2011; 19: 174–180
   Google Scholar
• Moodie C, Mackintosh AM, Hastings G, Ford A. Young adult smokers’ perceptions of plain packaging: A pilot naturalistic study. Tobacco Control 2011; 20: 367–373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moodie C, Ford A, Mackintosh AM, Hastings GB. Young people’s perceptions of cigarette packaging and plain packaging: An online survey. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, in press
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möller KK. Comment on: The marketing mix revisited: Towards the 21st century marketing. Journal of Marketing Management 2006; 22: 439–450
   Google Scholar
• Munafò MR, Roberts N, Bauld L, Leonards U. Plain packaging increases visual attention to health warnings on cigarette packs in non-smokers and weekly smokers but not daily smokers. Addiction 2011; 106: 1505–1510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustoe Merriman Herring and Levy (1996). Lambert and Butler advertising brief. Retrieved February 7, 2011, from http://www.tobaccopapers.com/PDFs/0500-0599/0592.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Nickels WG, Jolson MA. Packaging – the fifth ‘p’ in the marketing mix?. S.A.M Advanced Management Journal 1976; 41: 13–21
   Google Scholar
• Off Licence News (2010a). Silk cut 20s given textured new look. Off Licence News, 5 March.
   Google Scholar
• Off Licence News (2010b). Sovereign packs turn on city lights. Off Licence News, 15 October.
   Google Scholar
• Off Licence News (2010c). BAT launches 50g priced packs. Off Licence News, 5 February.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, J.C., & Jacoby, J. (1972). Cue utilisation in the quality perception process. In M. Venkatesan (Ed.), Proceedings of the third annual conference of the association for consumer research (pp. 167–179). Association for Consumer Research.
   Google Scholar
• Orth UR, Malkewitz K. Holistic package design and consumer brand impressions. Journal of Marketing 2008; 72: 64–81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orth UR, Campana D, Malkewitz K. Formation of consumer price expectation based on package design: Attractive and quality routes. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 2010; 18: 23–40
   Google Scholar
• Peattie K, Charter M. Green marketing. The marketing book, 4th, M.J. Baker. Butterworth-Heinmann, Oxford 1999; 593–620
   Google Scholar
• Peattie K, Crane A. Green marketing: Legend, myth, farce or prophesy?. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal 2005; 8: 357–370
   Google Scholar
• Pollay RW, Dewhirst T. The dark side of marketing seemingly “light” cigarettes: Successful images and failed fact. Tobacco Control 2002; 11: 18–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prone M. Package design has stronger ROI potential than many believe. Marketing News 1993; 27: 13
   Google Scholar
• Raghubir P, Greenleaf EA. Ratios in proportion: What should the shape of the package be?. Journal of Marketing 2006; 70: 95–107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson TN, Borzekowski DLG, Matheson DM, Kraemer HC. Effects of fast food branding on young children’s taste preferences. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine 2007; 161: 792–797
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rokka J, Uusitalo L. Preference for green packaging in consumer product choices: Do consumers care?. International Journal of Consumer Studies 2008; 32: 516–525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roper S, Parker C. How (and where) the mighty have fallen: Branded litter. Journal of Marketing Management 2006; 22: 473–487
   Google Scholar
• Rundh B. The multi-faceted dimension of packaging: Marketing logistic or marketing tool?. British Food Journal 2005; 107: 670–684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sara R. Packaging as a retail marketing tool. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management 1990; 20: 29–30
   Google Scholar
• Schlackmann W, Chittenden D. Packaging research. Consumer Market Research Handbook, R.M. Worchester, J. Downham. Elsevier science, Amsterdam 1986; 513–536
   Google Scholar
• Selame E. Packaging: The importance of being noticed. Management Review 1985; 74: 48–50
   Google Scholar
• Short D. Packaging: Marketing’s secret weapon. Marketing Times 1974; September/October: 6–8
   Google Scholar
• Talking Retail (2011). Baxters introduces price-marked packs. Retrieved February 17, 2011, from http://www.talkingretail.com/products/product-news/baxters%E2%80%99-introduces-price-marked-packs.
   Google Scholar
• The Grocer (2007). Research notes. The Grocer, 24 February.
   Google Scholar
• The Grocer (2009). Sterling to stick with value move. The Grocer, 28 February.
   Google Scholar
• The Grocer (2011). Cash in: Laundry, awash with innovation. The Grocer, 7 February.
   Google Scholar
• The Research Business (1996). Qualitative research into the UK potential for Marlboro Medium. Retrieved February 17, 2011, from http://www.tobaccopapers.com/PDFs/0500-0599/0597.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Tobacco Journal International (2009). New shape, new feel for cigarettes. Tobacco Journal International, 9 July.
   Google Scholar
• Underwood RL. The communicative power of product packaging: Creating brand identity via lived and mediated experience. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 2003; 11: 62–75
   Google Scholar
• Underwood RL, Ozanne JL. Is your package an effective communicator? A normative framework for increasing the communicative competence of packaging. Journal of Marketing Communications 1998; 4: 207–220
   Google Scholar
• van den Berg-Weitzel, L., & van de Laar, G. (2006). The third dimension. Admap Magazine, October.
   Google Scholar
• Wakefield M, Morley C, Horan JK, Cummings KM. The cigarette pack as image: New evidence from tobacco industry documents. Tobacco Control 2002; 11: i73–i80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, G. (2009). Cash in: Tobacco – keeping tabs. Convenience Store, 16 October.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, G. (2010). Cash in: Tobacco – cheap and cheery. Convenience store, 15 October.
   Google Scholar
• Wansink B. Can package size accelerate usage volume?. Journal of Marketing 1996; 60(3)1–14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wansink B, Park SB. At the movies: How external cues and perceived taste impact on consumption volume. Food Quality and Preference 2001; 12: 69–74
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wansink B, van Ittersum MK. Weight and height and shape and size: When do peripheral cues drive evaluation and consumption?. Advances in Consumer Research 2003; 30: 363–365
   Google Scholar
• Waste and Resources Action Programme (2010). Brand, design and innovation. Retrieved August 20, 2010, from http://www.wrap.org.uk/retail/the_guide_to_evolving_packaging_design/brand_design_and_innovation/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Yang S, Raghubir P. Can bottles speak volumes? The effect of package shape on how much to buy. Journal of Retailing 2005; 81: 269–281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeithaml VA. Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing 1988; 52: 2–22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar