Validation of the observational version of the motivation for treatment scale

References

• Arbuckle JL. Amos 5.0 update to the Amos user's guide. Smallwaters Corporation, Chicago, IL 2003
   Google Scholar
• Ball SA, Carroll KM, Canning Ball M, Rounsaville BJ. Reasons for dropout from drug abuse treatment: Symptoms, personality, and motivation. Addictive Behaviors 2006; 31: 320–330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broome KM, Joe GW, Simpson DD. Engagement models for adolescents in DATOS-A. Journal of Adolescent Research 2001; 16: 608–623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broome KM, Simpson DD, Joe GW. Patient and program attributes related to treatment process indicators in DATOS. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 1999; 57: 127–135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown JM, Miller WR. Impact of motivational interviewing on participation and outcome in residential alcoholism treatment. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 1993; 7: 211–218
   Google Scholar
• Burke AC, Gregoire TK. Substance abuse treatment outcomes for coerced and noncoerced clients. Health and Social Work 2007; 32: 7–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll KM, Ball SA, Nich C, Martino S, Frankforter TL, Farentinos C, Woody GE, et al. Motivational interviewing to improve treatment engagement and outcome in individuals seeking treatment for substance abuse: A multisite effectiveness study. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2006; 81: 301–312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Leon G. Integrative recovery: A stage paradigm. Substance Abuse 1996; 17: 51–63
   Google Scholar
• De Leon G, Melnick G, Kressel D. Motivation and readiness for therapeutic community treatment among cocaine and other drug abusers. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 1997; 23: 169–189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Leon G, Melnick G, Thomas G, Kressel D, Wexler HK. Motivation for treatment in a prison-based therapeutic community. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 2000; 26: 33–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Leon G, Melnick G, Tims FM. The role of motivation and readiness in treatment and recovery. Relapse and recovery in addictions, FM Tims, C Leukefeld, JJ Platt. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, USA 2001; 143–171
   Google Scholar
• De Weert-Van Oene GA, Schippers GM, DeJong CAJ, Schrijvers GJP. Motivation for treatment in substance-dependence patients. Psychometric evaluation of the TCU Motivation for Treatment Scales. European Addiction Research 2002; 8: 2–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeJong CAJ, Willems JCEW, Schippers GM, Hendriks VM. The addiction severity index: Reliability and validity in a Dutch alcoholic population. International Journal of the Addictions 1995; 30: 605–616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demmel R, Beck B, Richter D, Reker T. Readiness to change in a clinical sample of problem drinkers: Relation to alcohol use, self-efficacy, and treatment outcome. European Addiction Research 2004; 10: 133–138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiClemente CC. Motivation for change: Implications for substance abuse treatment. Psychological Science 1999; 10: 209–213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiClemente CC, Schlundt D, Gemmell L. Readiness and stages of change in addiction treatment. The American Journal on Addictions 2004; 13: 103–119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garb HN. Clinical judgment, clinical training, and professional experience. Psychological Bulletin 1989; 105: 387–396
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groshkova T. Motivation in substance misuse treatment. Addiction Research & Theory 2010; 18: 494–510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gryczynski J, Schwartz R, O’Grady K, Jaffe J. Dropout from interim methadone and subsequent comprehensive methadone maintenance. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 2009; 35: 394–398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmon C, Hawkins EJ, Lambert MJ, Slade K, Whipple JS. Improving outcomes for poorly responding clients: The use of clinical support tools and feedback to clients. Journal of Clinical Psychology 2005; 61: 175–178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks VM, Kaplan CD, Van Limbeek J, Geerlings P. The addiction severity index: Reliability and validity in a Dutch addict population. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 1989; 6: 133–141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiller ML, Knight K, Leukefeld C, Simpson DD. Motivation as a predictor of therapeutic engagement in mandated residential substance abuse treatment. Criminal Justice and Behavior 2002; 29: 56–75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgins DC. Stages of change assessments in alcohol problems: Agreement across self- and clinician-reports. Substance Abuse 2001; 22: 87–96
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holsbeek T, De Weert-Van Oene GA, Roomer A, De Jong CA. Het gebruik van motivatievragenlijsten in de behandeling van chronisch verslaafde patiënten. Verslaving 2010; 6: 55–64
   Google Scholar
• Joe GW, Simpson DD, Broome KM. Effects of readiness for drug abuse treatment on client retention and assessment of process. Addiction 1998; 93: 1177–1190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joosten EA. Let's decide together: Shared decision-making in addiction health care. Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands 2009
   Google Scholar
• Joosten EA, De Jong CA, De Weert-Van Oene GA, Sensky T, van der Staak CPF. Shared decision-making reduces drug use and psychiatric severity in substance-dependent patients. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 2009; 78: 245–253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joosten EA, De Weert-Van Oene GH, Sensky T, van der Staak CPF, De Jong CA. Treatment goals in addiction healthcare: The perspectives of patients and clinicians. International Journal of Social Psychiatry 2011; 57: 263–276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert MJ, Harmon C, Slade K, Whipple JS, Hawkins EJ. Providing feedback to psychotherapists on their patients’ progress: Clinical results and practice suggestions. Journal of Clinical Psychology 2005; 61: 165–174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledgerwood DM, Petry NM. Does contingency management affect motivation to change substance use?. Drug Alcohol Depend 2006; 83: 65–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longshore D, Teruya C. Treatment motivation in drug users: A theory-based analysis. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2006; 81: 179–188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLellan AT, Luborsky L, Woody GE, O’Brien CP. An improved diagnostic evaluation instrument for substance abuse patients. The addiction severity index. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 1980; 168: 26–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najavits L, Crits-Christoph P, Dieberger A. Clinicians’ impact on the quality of substance use disorder treatment. Substance Use & Misuse 2000; 35: 2161–2190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najavits L, Weiss R. Variations in therapist effectiveness in the treatment of patients with substance use disorders: An empirical review. Addiction 1994; 89: 679–688
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosyk B, Geller J, Guh DP, Oviedo-Joekes E, Brissette S, Marsh DC, Anis AH, et al. The effect of motivational status on treatment outcome in the North American Opiate Medication Initiative (NAOMI) study. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2009; 111: 161–165
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally JC. Psychomtric theory. McGraw-Hill, New York 1978
   Google Scholar
• Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. The transtheoretical approach. Handbook of psychotherapy integration, JC Norcross, MR Goldfried. Basic Books, New York, NY 1992; 300–334
   Google Scholar
• Raes V, De Jong CA, De Bacquer D, Broekaert E, DeMaeseneer J. The effect of using assessment instruments on substance-abuse outpatients’ adherence to treatment: A multi-centre randomised controlled trial. BMC Health Services Research 2011; 11: 123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson DD, Joe GW. Motivation as a predictor of early dropout from drug abuse treatment. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training 1993; 30: 357–368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson DD, Joe GW. A longitudinal evaluation of treatment engagement and recovery stages. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2004; 27: 89–97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson DD, Joe GW, Rowan Szal GA. Drug abuse treatment retention and process effects on follow-up outcomes. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 1997; 47: 227–235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson DD, Joe GW, Rowan Szal GA, Greene JM. Drug abuse treatment process components that improve retention. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 1997; 14: 565–572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windows. SPSS for, (Version 15.0) (2006). Chicago, IL: SPSS, Inc
   Google Scholar