Modelling vulnerability to gambling related harm: How disadvantage predicts gambling losses

References

• Adams PJ. Gambling, freedom and democracy. Routledge, New York, NY 2008
   Google Scholar
• Adams PJ, Raeburn J, De Silva K. A question of balance: Prioritizing public health responses to harm from gambling. Addiction 2009; 104: 688–691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics (2011). Taxation Revenue 2009–10, Australia, Cat No: 5506.0. Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/[email protected]/DetailsPage/5506.02009-10?OpenDocument (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/61DawsUpz)
   Google Scholar
• Baker RGV, Marshall DC. Modelling gambling time and economic assignments to weekly trip behaviour to gambling venues. Journal of Geographical Systems 2005; 7: 381–402
   Google Scholar
• Department of Justice. Taking action on problem gambling: A strategy for combating problem gambling in Victoria. Office of Gaming and Racing, Melbourne 2006
   Google Scholar
• Department of Justice Victoria. The Victorian gambling study: A longitudinal study of gambling and public health – Wave two findings. Department of Justice Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria 2011
   Google Scholar
• Doran B, Young M. Predicting the spatial distribution of gambling vulnerability: An application of gravity modeling using ABS Mesh Blocks. Applied Geography 2010; 30: 141–152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris J, & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index-final report. Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse
   Google Scholar
• Germain C, Vahanian A, Basquin A, Richoux-Benhaim C, Embouazza H, Lejoyeux M. Brief report: Coronary heart disease: An unknown association to pathological gambling. Front Psychiatry 2011; 2: 1–3, Article no. 11. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3089998/pdf/fpsyt-02-00011.pdf
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gerstein D, Murphy, S., Toce, M., Hoffmann, J., Palmer, A., Johnson, R., & Hill, M.A. (1999). Gambling impact and behavior study: Report to the national gambling impact study commission. Chicago: National Opinion Research Centre, University of Chicago
   Google Scholar
• Government of Victoria. A fairer Victoria: Real support, real gains. State Government of Victoria, Melbourne 2010
   Google Scholar
• Hansen MB, Rossow IM. Does a reduction in the overall amount of gambling imply a reduction at all levels of gambling?. Addiction Research and Theory 2012; 20: 145–152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hare S. A study of gambling in Victoria: Problem gambling from a public health perspective. Department of Justice, Melbourne 2009
   Google Scholar
• Hodgins D, Mansley C, Thygesen K. Risk factors for suicide ideation and attempts among pathological gamblers. American Journal of Addictions 2006; 15: 303–310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KPMG Consulting. Longitudinal community impact study: 1999 report. Victorian Casino and Gaming Authority, Melbourne 2000
   Google Scholar
• LaPlante DA, Shaffer HJ. Understanding the influence of gambling opportunities: Expanding exposure models to include adaptation. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 2007; 77: 616–623
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone C. The social economy of poker machine gambling in Victoria. International Gambling Studies 2001; 1: 46–65
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone C. Desire and the consumption of danger: Electronic gaming machines and the commodification of interiority. Addiction Research and Theory 2005; 13: 523–534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone C, Adams PJ. Harm promotion: Observations on the symbiosis between government and private industries in Australasia for the development of highly accessible gambling markets. Addiction 2011; 106: 3–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marmot MG, Stansfeld S, Patel C, North F, Head J, White I, , Smith GD, et al. Health inequalities among British civil servants: The Whitehall II study. The Lancet 1991; 337: 1387–1393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall D. Adelaide's pokie geography: Distribution of, and expenditure on, electronic gaming machines in Adelaide. South Australian Geographical Journal 1999; 98: 19–29
   Google Scholar
• Marshall D, Baker R. Unfair odds? Factors influencing the distribution of electronic gaming machines in Melbourne. Urban Policy and Research 2001a; 19: 77–92
   Google Scholar
• Marshall D, Baker R. Clubs, spades, diamonds and disadvantage: The geography of electronic gaming machines in Melbourne. Australian Geographical Studies 2001b; 39: 17–33
   Google Scholar
• Marshall DC, Baker RGV. The evolving market structures of gambling: Case studies modelling the socioeconomic assignment of gaming machines in Melbourne and Sydney, Australia. Journal of Gambling Studies 2002; 18: 273–291
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McMillen J, Doran B. Problem gambling and gaming machine density: Socio-spatial analysis of three Victorian localities. International Gambling Studies 2006; 6: 5–29
   Google Scholar
• Middleton J, Latif F. Gambling with the nation's health. BMJ 2007; 334: 828–829
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pearce J, Mason K, Hiscock R, Day P. A national study of neighbourhood access to gambling opportunities and individual gambling behaviour. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2008; 62: 862–868
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Productivity Commission. Australia's gambling industries. AusInfo, Melbourne 1999
   Google Scholar
• Productivity Commission (2010). Gambling inquiry report (Vol. Report No. 50), Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Rose G, Day S. The population mean predicts the number of deviant individuals. British Medical Journal 1990; 301: 1031–1034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reith G, Dobbie F. Beginning gambling: The role of social networks and environment. Addiction Research and Theory 2011; 19: 483–493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rush B, Veldhuizen S, Adlaf E. Mapping the prevalence of problem gambling and its association with treatment accessibility and proximity to gambling venues. Journal of Gambling Issues 2007; 20: 193–213
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler S, Round, D.K., & Wilson, J.K. (2010). The relationship between crime and gaming expenditure in Victoria. Final report in office of gaming and racing. Melbourne: Centre for Regulation and Market Analysis, University of South Australia
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer HJ, Korn DA. Gambling and related mental disorders: A public health analysis. Annual Review of Public Health 2002; 23: 171–212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw MC, Forbush KT, Schlinder J, Rosenman E, Black DW. The effect of pathological gambling on families, marriages, and children. CNS Spectrums 2007; 12: 615–622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• South Australian Centre for Economic Studies (2005). Community impacts of electronic gaming machine gambling. Report prepared for the Victorian gambling research panel. Melbourne: Office of Gaming and Research.
   Google Scholar
• The Economist online (2011). Gambling: The biggest losers. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/blogs/dailychart/2011/05/gambling (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/61DagLdT4)
   Google Scholar
• Victorian Auditor-General (2010). Taking action on problem gambling. Victorian Auditor-General's Report, Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Wardle H, Keily R, Thurstain-Goodwin M, Astbury G. Machines research study 1: Mapping the social and economic charateristics of high density gambling machine locations. Machines research 1, TRG Fund. Geofutures and the National Centre for Social Research, London 2011
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler BW, Rigby JE, Huriwai T. Pokies and poverty: Problem gambling risk factor geography in New Zealand. Health & Place 2006; 12: 86–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson RG, Pickett KE. Income inequality and population health: A review and explanation of the evidence. Social Science & Medicine 2006; 62: 1768–1784
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young M. Gambling, capitalism and the state: Towards a new dialectic of the risk society?. Journal of Consumer Culture 2010a; 10: 254–273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young M. Re-placing geographic accessibility: A response to the productivity commission. Gambling Research 2010b; 22: 20–31
   Google Scholar