Beyond criminal law: The multiple constitution of addiction in Australian legislation

References

• American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, Fourth Edition Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR). American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC 2000
   Google Scholar
• Brook H, Stringer R. Users, using, used: A beginner's guide to deconstructing drugs discourse. International Journal of Drug Policy 2005; 16: 316–325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke A, Clapp J. Ideology and social work practice in substance abuse settings. Social Work 1997; 42: 552–564
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns S, Peyrot M. Tough love: Nurturing and coercing responsibility and recovery in California drug courts. Social Problems 2003; 50: 416–438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clancey G, Howard J. Diversion and criminal justice drug treatment: Mechanism of emancipation or social control?. Drug and Alcohol Review 2006; 25: 377–385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courtwright D. The NIDA brain disease paradigm: History, resistance and spinoffs. BioSocieties 2010; 5: 137–147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleuze G. Difference and repetition. Athlone Press, London 1994
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald J. Drug diversion: An intersection between law enforcement and public health approaches to the control of illicit drug use. Drugs and public health, D Moore, P Dietze. Oxford University Press, Oxford and London 2008; 103–113
   Google Scholar
• Flacks S. Deviant disabilities: The exclusion of drug and alcohol addiction from the Equality Act 2010. Social and Legal Studies 2012; 21: 395–412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox K. Ideological implications of addiction: Theories and treatment. Deviant Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal 1999; 20: 209–232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser S, (2013). Junk: Overeating and obesity and the neuroscience of addiction. Addiction Research & Theory, 21, 496–506
   Google Scholar
• Fraser S, Seear K. Making disease, making citizens: The politics of hepatitis C. Aldershot, Ashgate 2011
   Google Scholar
• Fraser S, valentine k. Substance and substitution: Methadone subjects in liberal societies. Basingstoke, Palgrave 2008
   Google Scholar
• Gibson F. Drugs, discrimination and disability. Journal of Law and Medicine 2009; 17: 400–411
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gowan T, Whetstone S. Making the criminal addict: Subjectivity and social control in a strong-arm rehab. Punishment and Society 2012; 14: 69–93
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyman S. Addiction: A disease of learning and memory. The American Journal of Psychiatry 2005; 162: 1414–1422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joh E. Imagining the addict: Evaluating social and legal responses to addiction. Utah Law Review 2009; 175: 175–194
   Google Scholar
• Karasaki M, Fraser S, Moore D, Dietze P. The place of volition in addiction: Differing approaches and their implications for policy and service provision. Drug and Alcohol Review 2013; 32: 195–204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keane H. What's wrong with addiction?. Melbourne University Press, Melbourne 2002
   Google Scholar
• Keane H, Moore D, Fraser S. Addiction and dependence: Making realities in the DSM. Addiction 2011; 106: 875–877
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly J, Igelman A. Compulsive gambling litigation: Casinos and the duty of care. Gaming Law Review and Economics 2009; 13: 386–403
   Google Scholar
• Kranzler HR, Ting-Kai L. What is addiction?. Alcohol Research & Health 2008; 31: 93–95
   Google Scholar
• Law J. After method: Mess in social science research. Routledge, London and New York 2004
   Google Scholar
• Levine H. The discovery of addiction: Changing conceptions of habitual drunkenness in America. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 1978; 39: 143–174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marrati P. Time and affects: Deleuze on gender and sexual difference. Australian Feminist Studies 2006; 21: 313–325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller NS, (Ed.) (2010). Principles of Addictions and the law: Applications in forensic, mental health and medical practice. London: Elsevier
   Google Scholar
• Mol A. Ontological politics. A word and some questions. Actor network theory and after, J Law, J Hassard. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford 1999; 74–89
   Google Scholar
• Mol A. The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Duke University Press, Durham 2002
   Google Scholar
• Mol A, Law J. Complexities: An introduction. Complexities: Social studies of knolwedge practices, J Law, A Mol. Duke University Press, Durham 2002; 1–22
   Google Scholar
• Moore D, Fraser S. Producing the ‘problem’ of addiction in drug treatment. Qualitative Health Research 2013; 23: 916–923
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy J. Drug court as both a legal and medical authority. Deviant Behavior 2011; 32: 257–291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy J. The continuing expansion of drug courts: Is that all there is?. Deviant Behavior 2012; 33: 582–588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Race K. Framing responsibility: HIV, biomedical prevention, and the performativity of the law. Bioethical Inquiry 2012; 9: 327–338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritter A, Lintzeris N. Specialist interventions in treating clients with alcohol and drug problems. Drug use in Australia: Preventing harm, M Hamilton, T King, A Ritter. Oxford University Press, South Melbourne 2004; 221–235
   Google Scholar
• Robinson TE, Berridge KC. Addiction. Annual Reviews in Psychology 2003; 54: 25–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Room R. Addiction concepts and international control. The Social History of Alcohol and Drugs 2006; 20: 276–289
   Google Scholar
• Saldanha A. Actor-Network theory and critical sociology. Critical Sociology 2003; 29: 419–432
   Google Scholar
• Seddon T. Drugs and freedom. Addiction Research and Theory 2007a; 15: 333–342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seddon T. Coerced drug treatment in the criminal justice system: Conceptual, ethical and criminological issues. Criminology and Criminal Justice 2007b; 7: 269–286
   Google Scholar
• Seear K, & Fraser, S. (2014). The addict as victim: Producing the ‘problem’ of addiction in Australian victims of crime compensation laws. International Journal of Drug Policy, in press. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.02.016
   Google Scholar
• Seear K, Fraser S. Ben Cousins and the ‘double life’: Exploring citizenship and the voluntarity/compulsivity binary through the experiences of a ‘drug addicted’ elite athlete. Critical Public Health 2010a; 20: 439–452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seear K, Fraser S. The ‘sorry addict’: Ben Cousins and the construction of drug use and addiction in elite sport. Health Sociology Review 2010b; 19: 176–191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taxman F, Bouffard J. Substance abuse counselors’ treatment philosophy and the content of treatment services provided to offenders in drug court programs. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2003; 25: 75–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treloar C, Holt M. Deficit models and divergent philosophies: Service providers’ perspectives on barriers and incentives to drug treatment. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy 2006; 13: 367–382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volkow N, Li TK. Drug addiction: The neurobiology of behaviour gone awry. Nature Reviews 2004; 5: 963–970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrecko S. ‘Civilising technologies’ and the control of deviance. BioSocieties 2010; 5: 36–51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver M. Medical sequelae of addiction. Clinical addiction psychiatry, D Brizer, R Castaneda. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2010; 23–36
   Google Scholar
• West R. Theories of addiction. Addiction 2001; 96: 3–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West R. Theory of addiction. Oxford, Blackwell 2006a
   Google Scholar
• West R. Towards a comprehensive theory of addiction. Drugs and Alcohol Today 2006b; 6: 28–32
   Google Scholar
• Wild TC. Social control and coercion in addiction treatment: Towards evidence-based policy and practice. Addiction 2006; 101: 40–49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. ICD-10: The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. World Health Organisation, Geneva 2007
   Google Scholar