Test-retest reliability and validity of Audioscan and Békésy compared with pure tone audiometry

References

• Marttila T, Karikoski J. Comparison between audiometric and ABR thresholds in children: contradictory findings. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngol. 2006;263:399–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherf F, Brokx J, Wuyts FL, van de Heyning PH. The ASSR: clinical application in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired infants and adults, comparison with the click-evoked ABR and pure tone audiometry. Int J Audiol. 2006;45:281–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sideris I, Glattke TJ. A comparison of two methods of hearing screening in the preschool population. J Commun Disord. 2006;39:391–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer-Bisch C. Audioscan. A high-definition audiometry technique based on constant-level frequency sweeps: a new method with new hearing indicators. Audiology. 1996;35:63–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens D, Meredith R, Sirimanna T, France L, Almqvist C, Haugen H. Application of the audioscan in the detection of carriers of genetic hearing loss. Audiology. 1995;34:91–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhao F, Stephens D. Analyses of notches in audioscan and DPOAEs in subjects with normal hearing. Audiology. 1998;37: 335–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dishoeck HAE. Continuous-frequency audiometry. Acta Oto-Laryngol. 1952;41:58–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauz MT, Ahroon WA, Roberts SD. High frequency Békésy audiometry: II. Threshold test procedure, reliability and validity. J Aud Res. 1981;21:21–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gauz MT, Robinson DO, Peters GM. High-frequency Békésy audiometry: III. Reliability and validity revisited. J Aud Res. 1981;21:167–80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tokay HF, Hardick EJ. Validity and reliability of Békésy audiometry with preschool age children. J Speech Hear Res. 1971;14:205–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brunt MA. Cochlear and retrocochlear. Katz J. Handbook of Clinical Audiology, 5th. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Hall JW, Mueller HG. Audiologists’ Desk Reference: Diagnostic audiology principles, procedures, and protocols (Vol. 1). San Diego: Singular Press; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Stach BA. Clinical Audiology: an introduction. 1st. San Diego, California: Singular Publishing Group Inc.; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Jerger J. Békésy audiometry in analysis of auditory disorder. J Speech Hear Res. 1960;3:45–51.
   Google Scholar
• Owens E. Békésy tracings and site of lesion. J Speech Hear Disord. 1964;29:456–68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martin FN, Champlin CA, Chambers JA. Seventh survey of audiometric practices in the United States. J Am Acad Audiol. 1998;9:95–104.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ballantyne D. Handbook of Audiological Techniques, London: Butterworth-Heineman Ltd.; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Laroche C, Hetu R. A study of the reliability of automatic audiometry by the frequency scanning method (Audioscan). Audiology. 1997;36:1–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao F, Stephens D. Audioscan testing in patients with King-Kopetzky syndrome. Acta Oto-Laryngol. 1999;119:306–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao F, Stephens D, Meyer-Bisch C. The Audioscan: a high frequency resolution audiometric technique and its clinical applications. Clin Otolaryngol. 2002;27:4–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laoide-Kemp S, Parker D, Pratt S, Wilbraham K, Newton V. Audiometric identification of carriers of non-syndromal autosomal recessive genes for hearing loss. Paper presented at the 23rd International Congress on Audiology, Barri, Italy, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Meredith R, Stephens D, Sirimanna T. Audiometric detection of carriers of Usher syndrome type II. J Audiol Med. 1992; 1:11–9.
   Google Scholar
• Sirimanna T, Stephens D, Board T. Tinnitus and Audioscan notches. J Audiol Med. 1996;5:38–48.
   Google Scholar
• Wagenaar M, Snik AFM, Kimberling WJ, Cremers CWRJ. Carriers of the Usher type IB: is audiometric identification possible? Am J Otolaryngol.1996;17:853–8.
   Google Scholar
• Meredith R. Audiometric identification of carriers of non-manifesting genes for deafness. University of Southampton, Southampton, England, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Pelosi G, Hatzopoulos S, Martini A. Audioscan automatic audiometry: theoretical basis and normative data. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 1999;19:201–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stephens SDG. Clinical audiometry. Beagley HA. Audiology and Audiological Medicine (Vol 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1981. 365–70.
   Google Scholar
• British Society of Audiology. Recommended procedures for pure tone audiometry using a manually operated instrument. Br J Audiol. 1981;15:213–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhao F, Stephens D. Test-retest variability of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in human ears with normal hearing. Scand Audiol. 1999;28:171–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmuziger N, Probst R, Smurzynski J. Test-retest reliability of pure tone thresholds from 0.5 to 16 kHz using Sennheiser HDA 200 and Etymotic Research ER-2 earphones. Ear Hear. 2004;25:127–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yantis P. Pure tone air-conduction testing. Katz J. Handbook of clinical audiology, 1st. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1985. 153–69.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens SDG. Some individual factors influencing audiometric performance. Robinson DW. Occupational Hearing Loss. London: Academic Press; 1971. 153–69.
   Google Scholar