Presence and risks of nanosilica in food products

References

• Alexander GB, Heston WM, Iler RK. 1954. The solubility of amorphous silica in water. J Phys Chem 58(6):453–455.
   Google Scholar
• Bouwmeester H, Lynch I, Marvin HJP, Dawson KA, Berges M, Braguer D, Byrne HJ, Casy A, Chambers G, Clift MJD, Elia G, Fernandes TF, Fjellsbo LB, Hatto P, Juillerat L, Klein C, Kreyling WG, Nickel C, Riediker M, Stone V. 2010. Minimal analytical characterisation of engineerded nanomaterials needed for hazard assessment in biological matrices. published online. doi:10.3109/17435391003775266.
   Google Scholar
• Cha KE, Myung H. 2007. Cytotoxic effects of nanoparticles assessed in vitro and in vivo. J Microbiol Biotechnol Sep;17(9):1573–1578.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Boer WJ, van der Voet H, Bokkers BG, Bakker MI, Boon PE. 2009. Comparison of two models for the estimation of usual intake addressing zero consumption and non-normality. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess 26:1433–1449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Food Safety Agency (EFSA). 2009a. The potential risks arising from nanoscience and nanotechnologies on food and feed safety; Scientific Opinion of the Scientific Committee. EFSA J 958:1–39.
   Google Scholar
• EFSA. 2009b. Calcium silicate and silicon dioxide/silicic acid gel added for nutritional purposes to food supplements; Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food. EFSA J 1132:1–24. Accessed 27 May 2010 from the website: http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/scdocs/doc/1132.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ELC. 2009. Food additives and nanotechnologies. Federation of European Food Additives; Food Enzymes and Food Cultures Industries. October 2009. Accessed 27 May 2010 from the website: http://www.elc-eu.org/PDF/2009-10_Food_additives_and_nanotechnologies_-_ELC_position.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Expert Group on Vitamins and Minerals (EVM). 2003. Safe upper levels for vitamins and minerals: Part 4: Minerals: Risk assessment silicon.
   Google Scholar
• Evonik. 2009. Product specifications of Aerosil 200F and Aerosil 380F. Accessed 27 May 2010 from the website: http://www.aerosil.com/aerosil/en/industries/food/foodadditivecertification/.
   Google Scholar
• Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations/World Health Organization (FAO/WHO). 2009. Expert meeting on the application of nanotechnologies in the food and agriculture sectors: Potential food safety implications. Meeting report. Rome 104 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Kistemaker C, Bouman M, Hulshof KFAM. 1998. De consumptie van afzonderlijke producten door Nederlandse bevolkingsgroepen – Voedselconsumptiepeiling 1997–1998 (Consumption of food products by Dutch population groups – Dutch National Food Consumption Survey 1997–1998) (V98.812). TNO-Voeding, Zeist, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Lin B, Zhang Y, Zhang H. 2008. Primary study on the hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity of rats induced by three kinds of nanoparticles Wei Sheng Yan Jiu 37, 651–653 [in Chinese].
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2008. List of manufactured nanomaterials and list of endpoints for phase one of the OECD testing programme. Series on the safety of manufactured nanomaterials, Number 6 ENV/JM/MONO(2008)13/REV.
   Google Scholar
• Peters R, Wijma E, Bouwmeester H. 2010. Nano-silica in selected food items. RIKILT Report. (in preparation).
   Google Scholar
• Scientific Committee on Consumer Products (SCCP). 2007. Preliminary opinion on safety of nanomaterials in cosmetic products. 19 June 2007. Accessed 27 May 2010 from the website: http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/committees/04_sccp/docs/sccp_o_099.pdf. Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly-Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR). 2007. The existing and proposed definitions relating to products of nanotechnologies. 29 November 2007. Accessed 27 May 2010 from the website: http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/committees/04_scenihr/docs/scenihr_o_012.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR). 2006. Modified opinion on: The appropriateness of existing methodologies to assess the potential risks associated with engineered and adventitious products of nanotechnologies. 10 March 2006. Accessed 27 May 2010 from the website: http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/committees/04_scenihr/docs/scenihr_o_003b.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• So SJ, Jang IS, Han CS. 2008. Effect of micro/nano silica particle feeding for mice. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 8:5367–5371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takizawa Y, Hirasawa F, Noritomo E, Aida M, Tsunoda H, Uesugi S. 1988. Oral ingestion of syloid to mice and rats and its chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity. Acta Medica et Biologica 36:27–56.
   Google Scholar
• Tiede K, Boxall ABA, Tiede D, Tear SP, David H, Lewis J. 2009 A robust size-characterisation methodology for studying nanoparticle behaviour in ‘real’ environmental samples, using hydrodynamic chromatography coupled to ICP-MS. J Anal At Spectrom 24:964–972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiede K, Boxall ABA, Wang X, Gore D, Tiede D, Baxter M, David H, Tear SP, Lewis J. 2010. Application of hydrodynamic chromatography-ICP-MS to investigate the fate of silver nanoparticles in activated sludge. J Anal At Spectrom 25:1149–1154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). 1987. Principals for the safety assessment of food additives and contaminants in food. WHO Environmental Health Criteria 70.
   Google Scholar