Advanced search
Publication Cover
Acta Orthopaedica Volume 81, 2010 - Issue 6
Journal homepage
929
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Time-dependent improvement in functional outcome following LCS rotating platform knee replacement

A prospective longitudinal study in 50 patients

Tor Kjetil Nerhus Martina Hansens Hospital, BærumCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Stig Heir Martina Hansens Hospital, Bærum
,
Elisabeth Thornes Martina Hansens Hospital, Bærum
,
Jan Erik Madsen Orthopaedic Center, Oslo University Hospital, and Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
&
Arne Ekeland Martina Hansens Hospital, Bærum
Pages 727-732 | Received 10 Dec 2009, Accepted 24 Jul 2010, Published online: 11 Nov 2010

  • Buechel FF. Long-term followup after mobile-bearing total knee replacement. Clin Orthop 2002; (404):40-50.
  • Callaghan JJ, O'Rourke MR, Iossi MF, Liu SS, Goetz DD, Vittetoe DA, Cemented rotating-platform total knee replacement. A concise follow-up, at a minimum of fifteen years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2005; 87(9):1995-8.
  • Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Scuderi GR, Zingde S. Factors affecting flexion after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2007; (464):53-60.
  • Fitzgerald JD, Orav EJ, Lee TH, Marcantonio ER, Poss R, Goldman L, Mangione CM. Patient quality of life during the 12 months following joint replacement surgery. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 51(1):100-9.
  • Garratt AM, Brealey S, Gillespie WJ. Patient-assessed health instruments for the knee: a structured review. Rheumatology 2004; 43(11):1414-23.
  • Hróbjartsson A, Gøtzsche PC. Is the placebo powerless? Update of a systematic review with 52 new randomized trials comparing placebo with no treatment. J Intern Med 2004; 256(2):91-100.
  • Insall JN, Ranawat CS, Aglietti P, Shine J. A comparison of four models of total knee-replacement prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1976; 58(6):754-65.
  • Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop 1989; (248):13-4.
  • KAT Trial Group, Johnston L, MacLennan G, McCormack K, Ramsay C, Walker A. The Knee Arthroplasty Trial (KAT) design features, baseline characteristics, and two-year functional outcomes after alternative approaches to knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2009; 91(1):134-41.
  • Kennedy DM, Hanna SE, Stratford PW, Wessel J, Gollish JD. Preoperative function and gender predict pattern of functional recovery after hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2006; 21(4):559-66.
  • Kennedy DM, Stratford PW, Riddle DL, Hanna SE, Gollish JD. Assessing recovery and establishing prognosis following total knee arthroplasty. Phys Ther 2008; 88(1):22-32.
  • Kirkley A, Birmingham TB, Litchfield RB, Giffin JR, Willits KR, Wong CJ, A randomized trial of arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee. N Engl J Med 2008; 359(11):1097-107.
  • Lavernia C, D'Apuzzo M, Rossi MD, Lee D. Accuracy of knee range of motion assessment after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty (Suppl 1) 2008; 23(6):85-91.
  • Lenssen AF, Dam EM V, Crijns YH F, Verhey M, Geesink RJ T, Brandt PA VD, de Bie RA. Reproducibility of goniometric measurement of the knee in the in-hospital phase following total knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2007; 8:83.
  • Lingard EA, Katz JN, Wright EA, Sledge CB, Group KO. Predicting the outcome of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2004; 86(10):2179-86.
  • Lygre S, Furnes O. Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Norwegian version. Norwegian Arthroplasty registry 2007. Available from http://www.koos.nu/.
  • Marx RG. Knee rating scales. Arthroscopy 2003; 19(10):1103-8.
  • Moseley JB, O'Malley K, Petersen NJ, Menke TJ, Brody BA, Kuykendall DH, A controlled trial of arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee. N Engl J Med 2002; 347(2):81-8.
  • Nilsdotter A-K, Toksvig-Larsen S, Roos EM. A 5 year prospective study of patient-relevant outcomes after total knee replacement. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2009; 17(5):601-6.
  • Norkin CC, White J, Chang Y-H-H. Measurement of Joint Motion - a guide to goniometry. 2nd edition. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company, 1996.
  • Paradowski PT, Bergman S, Sundén-Lundius A, Lohmander LS, Roos EM. Knee complaints vary with age and gender in the adult population. Population-based reference data for the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2006; 7:38.
  • Ritter MA, Harty LD, Davis KE, Meding JB, Berend ME. Predicting range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. Clustering, log-linear regression, and regression tree analysis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2003; 85(7):1278-85.
  • Roos EM, Toksvig-Larsen S. Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - validation and comparison to the WOMAC in total knee replacement. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003; 1(1):17.
  • Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)–development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1998; 28(2):88-96.
  • Ryd L, Kärrholm J, Ahlvin P. Knee scoring systems in gonarthrosis. Evaluation of interobserver variability and the envelope of bias. Score Assessment Group. Acta Orthop Scand 1997; 68(1):41-5.
  • Tanner SM, Dainty KN, Marx RG, Kirkley A. Knee-specific quality-of-life instruments: which ones measure symptoms and disabilities most important to patients? Am J Sports Med 2007; 35 (9): 1450-8.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.