1,540
Views
45
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Statistical analysis of arthroplasty data

I. Introduction and background

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 253-257 | Received 27 Mar 2011, Accepted 14 Apr 2011, Published online: 30 May 2011

  • Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S, Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. JAMA 1996; 276: 637-9.
  • Brown D, Day S, Hemmings R, Wright D. Assessing the impact of ICH E9. Pharm Stat 2008; 7: 77-87.
  • Cole SR, Hernán MA. Adjusted survival curves with inverse probability weights. Comp Meth Prog Biomed 2004; 75: 45-9.
  • Cox DR. Regression models and life-tables. J Roy Stat Soc, Series B 1972; 34: 187-202.
  • Cutler SJ, Ederer F. Maximum utilization of the life-table method in analyzing survival. J Chronic Dis 1958; 8: 699-712.
  • Dobbs HS. Survivorship of total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1980; 62 (2): 168-73.
  • Dorey FJ, Korn EL. Effective sample sizes for confidence intervals for survival probabilities. Stat Med 1987; 6: 679-87.
  • Furnes O, Lie SA, Espehaug B, Vollset SE, Engesaeter LB, Havelin LI. Hip disease and the prognosis of total hip replacements. A review of 53 698 primary total hip replacements reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1987-99. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2001; 83: 579-86.
  • Gail M. A review and critique of some models used in competing risk analyses. Biometrics 1975; 31: 209-22.
  • Gehan EA. A generalized Wilcoxon test for comparing arbitrarily single-censored samples. Biometrika 1965; 52: 203-23.
  • Ghali Wa, Quan H, Brant R, Melle G, van Norris CM, Faris PD, Galbraith PD, Knudtson ML. Comparison of 2 methods for calculating adjusted survival curves from proportional hazards models. JAMA 2001; 286: 1494-7.
  • Havelin LI, Espehaug B, Furnes O, Engesæter LB, Lie SA, Vollset SE. Register studies. In: Outcome measures in orthopaedics and ortopaedic trauma, 2nd edition ( eds Pynset P, Fairbank J, Carr A). London: Arnold; 2004.
  • Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958; 53: 457-81.
  • Lie SA, Engesaeter LB, Havelin LI, Gjessing HK, Vollset SE. Dependency issues in survival analyses of 55 782 primary hip replacements from 47 355 patients. Stat Med 2004; 23: 3227-40.
  • Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Nat Cancer Inst 1959; 22: 719-48.
  • Murray DW, Carr AJ, Bulstrode C. Survival analysis of joint replacements. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1993; 75: 697-704.
  • Plint AC, Moher D, Morrison A, Schulz K, Altman DG, Hill C, Gaboury I. Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review. MJA 2006; 185: 263–7.
  • Ranstam J, Wagner P, Robertsson O, Lidgren L. Health-care quality registers. Outcome-oriented ranking of hospitals is unreliable. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2008; 90: 1556-61.
  • Robertsson O, Ranstam J. No bias of ignored bilaterality when analyzing the revision risk of knee prostheses: Analysis of a population based sample of 44,590 patients with 55,298 knee prostheses from the national Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register. BMC Musculoskel Disord 2003; 4: 1.
  • Tarone RE, Ware J. On distribution-free tests for equality of survival distributions. Biometrika 1977; 64: 156-60.
  • Vandenbroucke JP., STREGA, STROBE, STARD, SQUIRE, MOOSE, PRISMA, GNOSIS, TREND, ORION, COREQ, QUOROM, REMARK. and CONSORT: for whom does the guideline toll? J Clin Epidemiol 2009; 62: 594-6.