Advanced search
Publication Cover
Acta Orthopaedica Volume 83, 2012 - Issue 1
Journal homepage
1,033
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Time-dependent improvement in functional outcome following Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

A prospective longitudinal multicenter study involving 96 patients

Tor Kjetil NerhusOrthopaedics Department, Martina Hansens Hospital, BaerumCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Stig HeirOrthopaedics Department, Martina Hansens Hospital, Baerum
,
Ida SvegeOrthopaedics Department, Martina Hansens Hospital, Baerum
,
Inge SkråmmOrthopaedics Department, Akershus University Hospital, Loerenskog
,
Tore JervidaloOrthopaedics Department, Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital, Oslo
,
Jan Erik MadsenOrthopaedic Centre, Oslo University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
&
Arne EkelandOrthopaedics Department, Martina Hansens Hospital, Baerum
 show all
Pages 46-52 | Received 17 Jun 2011, Accepted 11 Nov 2011, Published online: 17 Jan 2012

  • Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988; 15 (12): 1833-40.
  • Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1998; 80 (1): 63-9.
  • Felts E, Parratte S, Pauly V, Aubaniac JM, Argenson JN. Function and quality of life following medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients 60years of age or younger. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2010; 96 (8): 861-7.
  • Furnes O, Espehaug B, Lie SA, Vollset SE, Engesaeter LB. Failure mechanisms after unicompartmental and tricompartmental primary knee replacement with cement. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2007; 89 (3): 519-25.
  • Gandhi R, de Beer J, Leone J, Petruccelli D, Winemaker M, Adili A. Predictive risk factors for stiff knees in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2006; 21 (1): 46-52.
  • Garratt AM, Brealey S, Gillespie WJ. Patient-assessed health instruments for the knee: a structured review. Rheumatology (Oxford, England). 2004; 43 (11): 1414-23.
  • Kleijn L LA, Hemert W L WV, Meijers W GH, Kester A DM, Lisowski L, Grimm B, Heyligers IC. Functional improvement after unicompartmental knee replacement: a follow-up study with a performance based knee test. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2007; 15 (10): 1187-93.
  • Koskinen E, Eskelinen A, Paavolainen P, Pulkkinen P, Remes V. Comparison of survival and cost-effectiveness between unicondylar arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty in patients with primary osteoarthritis: a follow-up study of 50,493 knee replacements from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2008; 79 (4): 499-507.
  • Lavernia C, D'Apuzzo M, Rossi MD, Lee D. Accuracy of knee range of motion assessment after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty (Suppl 1) 2008; 23 (6): 85-91.
  • Lenssen AF, Dam E MV, Crijns Y HF, Verhey M, Geesink R JT, Brandt P A VD, de Bie RA. Reproducibility of goniometric measurement of the knee in the in-hospital phase following total knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2007; 8: 83.
  • Li MG, Yao F, Joss B, Ioppolo J, Nivbrant B, Wood D. Mobile vs. fixed bearing unicondylar knee arthroplasty: A randomized study on short term clinical outcomes and knee kinematics. Knee 2006; 13 (5): 365-70.
  • Lombardi AV, Berend KR, Walter CA, Aziz-Jacobo J, Cheney NA. Is recovery faster for mobile-bearing unicompartmental than total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop 2009; 467 (6): 1450-7.
  • Lygre S, Furnes O. Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score, Norwegian version. Norwegian arthroplasty registry 2007. Available at: http://www.koos.nu/
  • Lygre SH, Espehaug B, Havelin LI, Furnes O, Vollset SE. Pain and function in patients after primary unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2010; 92 (18): 2890-7.
  • Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O'Connor JJ. The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1998; 80 (6): 983-9.
  • Nerhus TK, Heir S, Thornes E, Madsen JE, Ekeland A. Time-dependent improvement in functional outcome following LCS rotating platform knee replacement. Acta Orthop 2010; 81 (6): 727-32.
  • Newman J, Pydisetty RV, Ackroyd C. Unicompartmental or total knee replacement: the 15-year results of a prospective randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2009; 91 (1): 52-7.
  • Nilsdotter A-K, Toksvig-Larsen S, Roos EM. A 5 year prospective study of patient-relevant outcomes after total knee replacement. Osteoarthr Cartil 2009; 17(5): 601-6.
  • Pandit H, Jenkins C, Gill HS, Barker K, Dodd CA, Murray DW. Minimally invasive Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee replacement: Results of 1000 cases. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2011; 93 (2): 198-204.
  • Paradowski PT, Bergman S, Sundén-Lundius A, Lohmander LS, Roos EM. Knee complaints vary with age and gender in the adult population. Population-based reference data for the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2006; 7: 38.
  • Price AJ, Webb J, Topf H, Dodd CA, Goodfellow JW, Murray DW, Oxford Hip and Knee Group. Rapid recovery after oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty through a short incision. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16 (8): 970-6.
  • Ritter MA, Harty LD, Davis KE, Meding JB, Berend ME. Predicting range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. Clustering, log-linear regression, and regression tree analysis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2003; 85 (7): 1278-85.
  • Roos EM, Lohmander LS. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): from joint injury to osteoarthritis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003; 1 : 64.
  • Roos EM, Toksvig-Larsen S. Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)–validation and comparison to the WOMAC in total knee replacement. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003; 1 (1): 17.
  • Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)–development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1998; 28 (2): 88-96.
  • Ryd L, Kärrholm J, Ahlvin P. Knee scoring systems in gonarthrosis. Evaluation of interobserver variability and the envelope of bias. Score Assessment Group. Acta Orthop Scand 1997; 68 (1): 41-5.
  • Tanner SM, Dainty KN, Marx RG, Kirkley A. Knee-specific quality-of-life instruments: which ones measure symptoms and disabilities most important to patients? Am J Sports Med 2007; 35 (9): 1450-8.
  • Walton NP, Jahromi I, Lewis PL, Dobson PJ, Angel KR, Campbell DG. Patient-perceived outcomes and return to sport and work: TKA versus mini-incision unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2006; 19 (2): 112-6.
  • Zahiri CA, Schmalzried TP, Szuszczewicz ES, Amstutz HC. Assessing activity in joint replacement patients. J Arthroplasty 1998; 13 (8): 890-5.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.