Mechanical versus manual chest compression CPR under ground ambulance transport conditions

References

• Ramaraj R, Ewy GA. Rationale for continuous chest compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Heart 2009;95:1978–82.
   Google Scholar
• Grogaard HK, Wik L, Eriksen M, Brekke M, Sunde K. Continuous mechanical chest compressions during cardiac arrest to facilitate restoration of coronary circulation with percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:1093–4.
   Google Scholar
• Berg RA, Hemphill R, Abella BS, Aufderheide TP, Cave DM, Hazinski MF, . Part 5: Adult basic life support: 2010 American heart association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 2010;122:S685–705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellermann AL, Hackman BB, Somes G. Predicting the outcome of unsuccessful prehospital advanced cardiac life support. J Am Med Assoc 1993;270:1433–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herlitz J, Ekstrom L, Axelsson A, Bang A, Wennerblom B, Waagstein L, . Continuation of CPR on admission to emergency department after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Occurrence, characteristics and outcome. Resuscitation 1997;33:223–1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odegaard S, Olasveengen T, Steen PA, Kramer-Johansen J. The effect of transport on quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2009;80:843–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas SH, Stone CK, Bryan-Berge D. The ability to perform closed chest compressions in helicopters. Am J Emerg Med. 1994;12:296–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone CK, Thomas SH. Can correct closed-chest compressions be performed during prehospital transport? Prehospital and disaster medicine: The official journal of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the World Association for Emergency and Disaster Medicine in association with the Acute Care Foundation. 1995;10:121–3.
   Google Scholar
• Sunde K, Wik L, Steen PA. Quality of mechanical, manual standard and active compression-decompression CPR on the arrest site and during transport in a manikin model. Resuscitation 1997;34:235–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang HC, Chiang WC, Chen SY, Ke YL, Chi CL, Yang CW, . Video-recording and time-motion analyses of manual versus mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation during ambulance transport. Resuscitation 2007;74:453–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olasveengen TM, Wik L, Steen PA. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation before and during transport in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2008;76:185–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapleton ER. Comparing cpr during ambulance transport. Manual vs. Mechanical methods. J Emerg Med Ser 1991;16:63–4, 66, 68 passim.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roberts BG. Machine vs. Manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation in moving vehicles. EMT J. 1979;3:30–4.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner EB, Persse D, Souders CM, Sterz F, Malzer R, Lozano M, Jr, . Design of the circulation improving resuscitation care (circ) trial: A new state of the art design for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest research. Resuscitation 2011;82:294–9.
   Google Scholar
• Gates S, Smith JL, Ong GJ, Brace SJ, Perkins GD. Effectiveness of the Lucas device for mechanical chest compression after cardiac arrest: Systematic review of experimental, observational and animal studies. Heart. 2012;98:908–13.
   Google Scholar
• Cave DM, Gazmuri RJ, Otto CW, Nadkarni VM, Cheng A, Brooks SC, . Part 7: Cpr techniques and devices: 2010 American heart association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 2010;122:S720–8.
   Google Scholar
• Travers AH, Rea TD, Bobrow BJ, Edelson DP, Berg RA, Sayre MR, . Part 4: CPR overview: 2010 American heart association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 2010;122:S676–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg GA. Perceived exertion. Exercise Sport Sci R. 1974;2:131–53.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2005 American heart association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 2005;112:IV1–203.
   Google Scholar
• Maguire BJ, Hunting KL, Smith GS, Levick NR. Occupational fatalities in emergency medical services: A hidden crisis. Ann Emerg Med. 2002;40:625–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker LR, Zaloshnja E, Levick N, Li G, Miller TR. Relative risk of injury and death in ambulances and other emergency vehicles. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2003;35:941–948.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slattery DE, Silver A. The hazards of providing care in emergency vehicles: An opportunity for reform.Prehosp Emerg Care. 2009;13:388–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson A, Chapman FW. Technical factors weaken the clinical relevance of manikin measurements of mechanical chest compression depth. Resuscitation 2012;83:e97.
   Google Scholar
• Abella BS, Alvarado JP, Myklebust H, Edelson DP, Barry A, O’Hearn N, . Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during in-hospital cardiac arrest. J Am Med Assoc 2005;293:305–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu JY, Li CS, Liu ZX, Wu CJ, Zhang GC. A comparison of 2 types of chest compressions in a porcine model of cardiac arrest. Am J Emerg Med. 2009;27:823–9.
   Google Scholar
• Steen S, Liao Q, Pierre L, Paskevicius A, Sjoberg T. Evaluation of Lucas, a new device for automatic mechanical compression and active decompression resuscitation. Resuscitation 2002;55:285–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubertsson S, Karlsten R. Increased cortical cerebral blood flow with Lucas; a new device for mechanical chest compressions compared to standard external compressions during experimental cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation 2005;65:357–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer-Johansen J, Myklebust H, Wik L, Fellows B, Svensson L, Sorebo H, . Quality of out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with real time automated feedback: A prospective interventional study. Resuscitation 2006;71:283–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axelsson C, Nestin J, Svensson L, Axelsson AB, Herlitz J. Clinical consequences of the introduction of mechanical chest compression in the EMS system for treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest-a pilot study. Resuscitation 2006;71:47–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyss CA, Fox J, Franzeck F, Moccetti M, Scherrer A, Hellermann JP, . Mechanical versus manual chest compression during CPR in a cardiac catherization setting. Cardiovasc Med. 2010;13:92–6.
   Google Scholar