Bedside computer access for an individual with severe and multiple disabilities: A case study

References

• Goodman N, Jette AM, Houlihan B, Williams S. Computer and internet use by persons after traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;89:1492–1498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tai K, Blain S, Chau T. A review of emerging access technologies for individuals with severe motor impairments. Assist Technol 2008;20:204–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson T, Broughton C, Gauthier MJA, Prochazka A. Tooth-click control of a hands-free computer interface. IEEE Transact Biomed Eng 2008;55:2050–2056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Man DWK, Wong MSL. Evaluation of computer-access solutions for students with quadriplegic athetoid cerebral palsy. Am J Occupat Ther 2007;61:355–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith E, Delargy M. Locked-in syndrome. BMJ 2005;330:406–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doble JE, Haig AJ, Anderson C, Katz R. Impairment, activity, participation, life satisfaction, and survival in persons with locked-in syndrome for over a decade: Follow-up on a previously reported cohort. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2003;18:435–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bache J, Derwent G. Access to computer-based leisure for individuals with profound disabilities. Neurorehabilitation 2008;23:343–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu TF, Meng LF, Wang HP, Wu WT, Li TY. Computer access assessment for persons with physical disabilities: A guide to assistive technology interventions. Lect Notes Comput Sci 2002;2398:204–211.
   Google Scholar
• Craig A, Tran Y, McIsaac P, Boord P. The efficacy and benefits of environmental control systems for the severely disabled. Med Sci Monitor 2004;11:32–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoppestad BS. Inadequacies in computer access using assistive technology devices in profoundly disabled individuals: An overview of the current literature. Disabil Rehabil: Assist Technol 2007;2:189–199.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kruse D, Krueger A, Drastal S. Computer use, computer training, and employment: Outcomes among people with spinal cord injuries. Spine 1996;21:891–896.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turpin G, Armstrong J, Frost P, Fine B, Ward C, Pinnington L. Evaluation of alternative computer input devices by people with disabilities. J Med Eng Tech 2005;29:119–129.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoppestad BS. Essential elements for assessment of persons with severe neurological impairments for computer access utilizing assistive technology devices: A Delphi study. Disabil Rehabil: Assist Tech 2006;1:3–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fraser BA, Bryen D, Morano CK. Development of a physical characteristic assessment (PCA): A checklist for determining appropriate computer access for individuals with cerebral palsy. Assist Tech 1995;7:26–35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meng LF, Li TY, Chu CN, Chen MC, Chang S, Chou A, Yang T, Hui C, Chiao K, Lin YL, Weng P, Shih Y, Lu T, Yeh N. Applications of computer access approach to persons with quadriplegic. Lect Notes Comput Sci 2004;3118:857–864.
   Google Scholar
• Pushchak TA, Sasi S. Intelligent model for rating cognitive capability for computer access of people with disabilities. Lect Notes Comput Sci 2004;3118:991–994.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips B, Zhao H. Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assist Tech 1993;5:36–45.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Biegel A. Assistive technology assessment; more than the device. Intervention in School and Clinic 2000;35:237–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas SA, Kirkpatrick AE, MacKenzie IS. Testing pointing devices performance and user assessment with the ISO9241, part 9 standard. Available from: http://www.yorku.ca/mack/CHI99b.html. Last accessed January 2008.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. ISO 9241-9 Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals, Non-keyboard Input Device Requirements, Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Law M, Baptiste S, McCal MA, Opzoomer A, Polatajko H, Pollock N. The Canadian occupational performance measure: An outcome measure for occupational therapy. Can J Occupat Ther 1990;57:82–87.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Law M, Baptiste S, McColl MA, Opzoomer A, Polatajko H, Pollock N. Canadian occupational performance measure. 3rd ed. Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications ACE; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson RC, Koesten HH. Adaptive one-switch row-column scanning. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 1999:7:464–473.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lin Y, Wu T, Chen M, Yeh Y, Wang H. Designing a scanning on-screen keyboard for people with severe motor disabilities. Lect Notes Comput Sci 2008;5105:1184–1187.
   Google Scholar
• Drainoni M, Houlihan B, Williams S, Vedrani M, Esch D, Lee-Hood E, Weiner C. Patterns of internet use by persons with spinal cord injuries and relationship to health-related quality of life. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:1872–1875.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houlihan BV, Drainoni M, Warner G, Nesathurai S, Wierbicky J. The impact of internet access for people with spinal cord injuries: A descriptive analysis of a pilot study. Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:422–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ. The impact of assistive technology on the lives of people with disabilities. In: Gray DB, Quatrano LA, Lieberman ML, editors. Designing and using assistive technology: The human perspective. Balitmore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.; 1996. pp 99–115.
   Google Scholar
• Letts L. Occupational therapy and participatory research: A partnership worth pursuing. Am J Occupat Ther 2003:57:77–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Halloran RO, Hickson L, Worrall. Environmental factors that influence communication between people with communication disability and their healthcare providers in hospital: A review of the literature within the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2008;43:601–632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lysack C, Komanecky M, Kabel A, Cross K, Neufeld S. Environmental factors and their role in community integration after spinal cord injury. Can J Occup Ther 2007;74:243–254.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Whiteneck G, Meade MA, Dijkers M, Tate DG, Bushnik T, Forchheimer MB. Environmental factors and their role in participation and life satisfaction after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:1793–1803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ. The change in emphasis from people to person: Introduction to the special issue on assistive technology. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:1–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparks N. Assistive technology assessment criteria. In: International Special Education Congress 24–25 July. University of Manchester; 2000. Electronic Citation. http://www.isec2000.org.uk/abstracts/papers_s/sparks_1.htm. Last accessed February 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Horton AM. Behavioral interventions with brain-injured children. New York, USA: Plenum Press; 1994.
   Google Scholar