A critical review of powered mobility assessment and training for children

References

• Butler C. Effects of powered mobility on self-initiated behaviours of very young children with locomotor disability. Dev Med Child Neurol 1986;28:325–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tefft D, Guerette P, Furumasu J. Cognitive predictors of young children's readiness for powered mobility. Dev Med Child Neurol 1999;41:665–670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furumasu J, Tefft D, Guerette P. The impact of early powered mobility on young children's play and psychosocial skills. Proceedings of the 24th International Seating Symposium 2008 March 6–8. Phoenix, AZ: UBC; 2008. pp 160–164.
   Google Scholar
• Odor P, Watson M. Learning through smart wheelchairs: a formative evaluation of the CALL centre's smart wheelchairs as part of children's emerging mobility, communication, education and personal development. Final report to the Nuffield Foundation and the Scottish Office Education Department, May 1994. Available from: http://callcentre.education.ed.ac.uk/. Last accessed 25 Jan 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Jones MA. Effects of power mobility on the development of young children with severe motor impairments. PhD dissertation. Oklahoma City (OK): University of Oklahoma; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Butler C, Okamoto GA, McKay TM. Powered mobility for very young disabled children. Dev Med Child Neurol 1983;25:472–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones MA, McEwen IR, Hansen L. Use of power mobility for a young child with spinal muscular atrophy. Phys Ther 2003;83:253–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deitz J, Swinth Y, White O. Powered mobility and preschoolers with complex developmental delays. Am J Occup Ther 2002; 56:86–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson L, Nyberg PJ. Driving to learn: a new concept for training children with profound cognitive disabilities in a powered wheelchair. Am J Occup Ther 2003;57:229–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottos M, Bolcati C, Scuito L, Ruggeri C, Feliciangeli A. Powered wheelchairs and independence in young children with tetraplegia. Dev Med Child Neurol 2001;43:769–777.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulsson K, Christofferson M. Psychosocial aspects of technical aids: how does independent mobility affect the psychosocial and intellectual development of children with physical disabilities? Proceedings of the 2nd conference on Rehabilitation Engineering; 17–22 June 1984; Ottawa, Canada: RESNA; 1984. pp 282–285.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy P. Powered wheelchair mobility: an occupational performance evaluation perspective. Aust Occup Ther J 2004;51:34–42.
   Google Scholar
• Toole P. Power mobility for young children: current knowledge, attitudes and practice among pediatric occupational therapists and physical therapists in Washington State. MSc dissertation. Tacoma (WA): University of Puget Sound; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Guerette P, Tefft D, Furumasu J. Pediatric powered wheelchairs: results of a national survey of providers. Assist Technol 2005;17:144–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet P. Assessment and training of children for powered mobility in the UK. Technol Disabil 2002;14:173–182.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson D, Chan R A, Kaiserman E. Development of the power-mobility indoor driving assessment for residents of long-term care facilities: a preliminary report. Can J Occup Ther 1994;61:269–276.
   Google Scholar
• Letts L, Dawson D, Kaiserman-Goldstein E. Development of the power-mobility community driving assessment. Can J Rehabil 1998;11:123–129.
   Google Scholar
• Dalhousie University. Wheelchair Skills Program (WSP), Version 4.1. 2007. Available from: www.wheelchairskillsprogram.ca. Last accessed 20 Jan 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Hildreth K, Horsman C, Sturtevant E. Wheelchair training protocol. East Providence (RI): Easter Seal Society of Rhode Island; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Balfour L, Lawrence M. Home training for powered mobility. Toronto (ON): The Hugh MacMillan Medical Centre; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Furumasu J, Guerette P, Tefft D. The development of a powered wheelchair mobility program for young children. Technol Disabil 1996;5:41–48.
   Google Scholar
• Durkin J. Developing powered mobility with children who have multiple and complex disabilities: moving forward. PhD dissertation. Brighton (UK): University of Brighton; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Durkin J. Discovering powered mobility skills with children: ‘Responsive partners' in learning. Int J Ther Rehabil 2009;16:331–341.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson L. Driving to learn: the process of growing consciousness of tool use – a grounded theory of de-plateauing. PhD dissertation. Lund (Sweden): University of Lund; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Reynell J. Language development and assessment. Lancaster (UK): MTP Press; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus HL, Dreyfus SE. Mind over machine: the power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. New York (NY): The Free Press; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Palisano RJ, Rosenbaum PL, Walter SD, Russell DJ, Wood, EP, Galuppi BE. Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 2006;39:214–223.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson LM, Eklund M. Driving to learn: powered wheelchair training for those with cognitive disabilities. Int J Ther Rehabil 2006;13:517–527.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley M, Cheek J. Grounded theory: exploiting the potential for occupational therapy. Br J Occup Ther 2003;66:143–150.
   Google Scholar
• Law M, Stewart D, Pollock N, Letts L, Bosch J, Westmorland M. Guidelines for critical review of the literature: qualitative studies; 1998. Available from: http://fhs.mcmaster.ca/rehab/ebp. Last accessed 11 May 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln YS, Guba EG. But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. In: Williams DD, editor. Naturalistic evaluation. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass; 1986. pp 73–84.
   Google Scholar
• Siegert RJ, McPherson KM, Dean SG. Theory development and a science of rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27:1493–1501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creek J, Feaver S. Models for practice in occupational therapy: Part 1, defining terms. Br J Occup Ther 1993;56:4–6.
   Google Scholar
• McColl MA. Guide to evaluating theory. In: McColl MA, Law M, Stewart D, Doubt L, Pollock N, Krupa T, editors. Theoretical basis of occupational therapy. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Slack Inc; 2002. pp 21–26.
   Google Scholar
• Krefting LH. The use of conceptual models in clinical practice. Can J Occup Ther 1985;52:173–178.
   Google Scholar
• Reed K. Models of practice. Baltimore (MD): Williams & Wilkins; 1984. p 29.
   Google Scholar
• Kangas K. Clinical assessment and training strategies for the child's mastery of independent powered mobility. In: Furumasu J, editor. Pediatric powered mobility: developmental perspectives, technical issues, clinical approaches. Arlington (VA): RESNA Press; 1997. pp 33–47.
   Google Scholar
• Wright-Ott C. The transitional powered mobility aid, a new concept and tool for early mobility. In Furumasu J, editor. Pediatric powered mobility: developmental perspectives, technical issues, clinical approaches. Arlington (VA): RESNA Press; 1997. pp 58–69.
   Google Scholar
• Janeschild M. Early power mobility: evaluation and training guidelines. In: Furumasu J, editor. Pediatric powered mobility: developmental perspectives, technical issues, clinical approaches. Arlington (VA): RESNA Press; 1997. pp 48–57.
   Google Scholar
• Westcott SL, Burtner P. Postural control in children: implications for pediatric practice. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 2004;24:5–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gentile AM. Skill acquisition: action, movement and neuromotor processes. In: Carr J, Shepherd RB, editors. Movement science: foundations for physical therapy in rehabilitation. 2nd ed. Gathersburg (MD): Aspen Publications; 2000. pp 111–188.
   Google Scholar
• Valvano J. Activity-focused motor interventions for children with neurological conditions. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 2004;24:79–107.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McEwen IR. Children with cognitive impairments. In: Campbell SK, Van der Linden DW, Palisano J, editors. Physical therapy for children. 2nd ed. Philadelphia (PA): WB Saunders; 2000. pp 502–531.
   Google Scholar
• Meehan D, Mineo B, Lyon S. Use of systematic prompting and prompt withdrawal to establish and maintain switch activation in a severely handicapped student. J Spl Educ Technol 1985;7:5–10.
   Google Scholar
• Verburg G. Predictors of successful powered mobility control. In: Jaffe KM, editor. Childhood powered mobility: developmental, technical and clinical perspective. Washington (DC): RESNA Press; 1987. pp 70–104.
   Google Scholar
• Furumasu J, Guerette P, Tefft D. Relevance of the pediatric powered wheelchair screening test for children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 2004;46:468–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kangas K. Powered mobility training for children with complex needs. Proceedings of 18th international seating symposium [proceeding on the internet]. 2002; Available from: www.seatingandmobility.ca/Iss2002/ToSunnyHill2/iss2002html/019_PoweredMob. Last accessed 15 Oct 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Manolson A. It takes two to talk: a parent's guide to helping children communicate. Toronto (Canada): The Hanen Centre; 1992.
   Google Scholar