A ‘visual-centred’ mapping approach for improving access to Web 2.0 for people with visual impairments

References

• Oreilly T. What is Web 2.0: design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Commun Strategies 2007;1:17–37.
   Google Scholar
• Mahemoff M. Ajax design patterns. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media Inc., 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Alliance for Technology Access. Computer and web resources for people with disabilities: a guide to exploring today's assistive technologies. 3rd ed. Alameda, CA: Hunter House, 2000. ISBN: 978-089-79330-01.
   Google Scholar
• Burks MR, Lauke PH, Thatcher J, Rutter R, Waddell C. Web accessibility: web standards and regulatory compliance. USA: Friends of Ed; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Chen C. CLC-4-TTS and Fire Vox: enabling the visually impaired to surf the Internet. Univ Texas Austin Undergrad Res J 2006;5:32–42.
   Google Scholar
• Ramen TV. Specialized browsers. In: Harper S, Yesilada Y, editors. Web accessibility: a foundation for research. London: Springer-Verlag; 2008 pp 195–213.
   Google Scholar
• Zajicek M. Web 2.0: hype or happiness? In: W4A '07: Proceedings of the 2007 international cross-disciplinary conference on Web accessibility (W4A). New York, NY: ACM; 2007, pp 35–39.
   Google Scholar
• Thiessen P, Chen C. Ajax live regions: chat as a case example. In: W4A '07: Proceedings of the 2007 international cross-disciplinary conference on Web accessibility (W4A). New York, NY: ACM; 2007, pp 7–14.
   Google Scholar
• Brown A, Jay C. Internet. 2008. A review of assistive technologies: can users access dynamically updating information? Technical report, University of Manchester, Electronic Citation. http://hcw-eprints.cs.man.ac.uk/70/. Last accessed January 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Keith J. Hijax: progressive enhancement with Ajax. In: Proceedings of X Tech 2006, Building Web 2.0. Alexandria, VA: IDEAlliance, Inc; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson B. Enabling an accessible Web 2.0. In: W4A '07: Proceedings of the 2007 international cross-disciplinary conference on Web accessibility (W4A). New York, NY: ACM; 2007, pp 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Thiessen P, Chen C. ARIA live regions: an introduction to channels. J Access Serv 2009;6:215–230.
   Google Scholar
• Thiessen P, Russell E. WAI-ARIA live regions and channels: ReefChat as a case example. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2009;4:276–287.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Obrenovic Z. Web accessibility and open source software. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2009;4:227–235.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bigham JP, Brudvik JT, Leung JO, Ladner RE. Enabling web users and developers to script accessibility with access-monkey. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2009;4:288–299.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buzzi M, Leporini B. Editing wikipedia content by screen reader: easier interaction with the accessible rich internet applications suite. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2009;4:264–275.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• W3C World Wide Web Consortium. Internet 2009. Accessible rich internet applications (WAI-ARIA) 1.0. Electronic Citation, http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/ REC-WCAG20-20081211/. Last accessed January 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Brown A, Jay C, Harper S. Audio representation of auto-suggest lists. In: W4A'09: Proceedings of the 2009 cross-disciplinary conference on web accessibility (W4A). 2009. pp 58–61.
   Google Scholar
• Gregor P, Sloan D, Newell AF. Disability and technology: building barriers or creating opportunities? Adv Comput 2005;4:283–346.
   Google Scholar
• Richards JT, Hanson VL. Web accessibility: a broader view. In: WWW '04: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on World Wide Web. New York, NY: ACM; 2004, pp 72–79.
   Google Scholar
• Thatcher J, Bohman P, Burks M, Henry SL, Regan B, Swierenga S, Urban MD, Waddell CD. Constructing accessible web sites. Berkeley, CA: Glasshaus Ltd, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Yaagoubi R, Edwards G. Cognitive design in action: developing assistive technology for situational awareness for persons who are blind. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2008;3:241–252.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Savidis A, Stephanidis C. Developing dual user interfaces for integrating blind and sighted users: the HOMER UIMS. In: CHI '95: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. New York, NY: ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.; 1995, pp 106–113.
   Google Scholar
• Harper S, Yesilada Y, Goble C. Accessible layout – the tension between accessibility and visual design. In: Harper S, Yesilada Y, Goble C, editors. W4A '04: Proceedings of the 2004 International Cross-Disciplinary Workshop on Web Accessibility (W4A). New York, NY: ACM Press, 5 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Jay C, Brown A. Internet 2008. User review document: results of initial sighted user investigations. Technical Report, University of Manchester, Electronic Citation. http://hcw-eprints.cs.man.ac.uk/49/, Last accessed January 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Jay C, Brown A. Internet 2010. Internal evaluation of the SASWAT browser: method, results and experimental materials. Technical Report, University of Manchester, Electronic Citation. http://hcw-eprints.cs.man.ac.uk/125/. Last accessed January 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Brown A, Jay C. Internet. 2009. HCW-fire vox user manual. Technical report, University of Manchester, Electronic Citation. http://hcw-eprints.cs.man.ac.uk/120/. Last accessed January 2010.
   Google Scholar