Technology-assisted programs for promoting leisure or communication engagement in two persons with pervasive motor or multiple disabilities

References

• Copley J, Ziviani J. Use of a team-based approach to assistive technology assessment and planning for children with multiple disabilities: a pilot study. Assist Technol 2007;19:109–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fager S, Hux K, Beukelman DR, Karantounis R. Augmentative and alternative communication use and acceptance by adults with traumatic brain injury. Augment Altern Commun 2006;22:37–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gartland D. Considerations in the selection and use of technology with people who have cognitive deficits following acquired brain injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2004;14:61–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, O'Reilly MF, Singh NN, Sigafoos J, Chiapparino C, Stasolla F, Bosco A, De Pace C, Oliva D. Enabling a young man with minimal motor behavior to manage independently his leisure television engagement. Percept Motor Skills 2007;104:47–54.
   Google Scholar
• Baker PM, Moon NW. Wireless technologies and accessibility for people with disabilities: findings from a policy research instrument. Assist Technol 2008;20:149–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maki AL, Rudrud EH, Schulze KA, Rapp JT. Increasing therapeutic exercise participation by individuals with acquired brain injury using self-recording and reinforcement. Behav Interv 2008;23:75–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaughton D, Bryen DN. AAC technologies to enhance participation and access to meaningful societal roles for adolescents and adults with developmental disabilities who require AAC. Augment Altern Commun 2007;23:217–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naudé K, Hughes M. Considerations for the use of assistive technology in patients with impaired states of consciousness. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2005;15:514–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demers L, Fuhrer MJ, Jutai J, Lenker J, Depa M, De Ruyter F. A conceptual framework of outcomes for caregivers of assistive technology users. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2009;88:645–655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, O'Reilly MF, Singh NN, Sigafoos J, Oliva D, Antonucci M, Tota A, Basili G. Microswitch-based programs for persons with multiple disabilities: an overview of some recent developments. Percept Motor Skills 2008;106:355–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, O'Reilly MF, Cuvo AJ, Singh NN, Sigafoos J, Didden R. PECS and VOCA to enable students with developmental disabilities to make requests: an overview of the literature. Res Dev Disabil 2007;28:468–488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bache J, Derwent G. Access to computer-based leisure for individuals with profound disabilities. NeuroRehabilitation 2008;23:343–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavender A, Vanam R, Barney DK, Ladner RE, Riskin EA. MobileASL: intelligibility of sign language vide over mobile phones. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2008;3:93–105.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DePompei R, Gillette Y, Goetz E, Xenopoulos-Oddsson A, Bryen D, Dowds M. Practical applications for use of PDAs and smartphones with children and adolescents who have traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation 2008;23:487–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durando J. A survey on literacy instruction for students with multiple disabilities. J Visual Impair Blindness 2008;102:40–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow DH, Nock M, Hersen M. Single-case experimental designs: strategies for studying behavior change. 3rd ed. New York: Allyn & Bacon; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Sakai S, Hirayama K, Iwasaki S, Yamadori A, Sato N, Ito A, Kato M, Sudo M, Tsuburaya K. Contrast sensitivity of patients with severe motor and intellectual disabilities and cerebral visual impairment. J Child Neurol 2002;17:731–737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryen DN, Carey A, Friedman M. Cell phone use by adults with intellectual disabilities. Intellect Dev Disabil 2007;45:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoppestad BS. Inadequacies in computer access using assistive technology devices in profoundly disabled individuals: an overview of the current literature. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2007;2:189–199.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Power D, Power MR, Rehling B. German deaf people using text communication: short message service, TTY, relay services, fax, and e-mail. Am Ann Deaf 2007;152:291–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez A., Dimmick J, Feaster J, Lin S-F. Revisiting interpersonal media competition: the gratification niches of instant messaging, e-mail, and the telephone.Commun Res 2008;35:529–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith-Jackson TL, Nussbaum MA, Mooney AM. Accessible cell phone design: development and application of needs analysis framework. Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:549–560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan J, Chenoweth L, McAuliffe D. Email-facilitated qualitative interviews with traumatic brain injury survivors: a new and accessible method. Brain Injury 2006;20:1283–1294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greig CA, Harper R, Hirst T, Howe T, Davidson B. Barriers and facilitators to mobile phone use for people with aphasia. Top Stroke Rehabil 2008;15:307–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohlberg MM, Ehlhardt LA, Fickas S, Sutcliffe A. A pilot study exploring electronic (or e-mail) mail in users with acquired cognitive-linguistic impairments. Brain Injury 2003;17:609–629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todis B, Sohlberg MM, Hood D, Fickas S. Making electronic mail accessible: perspectives of people with acquired cognitive impairments, caregivers and professionals. Brain Injury 2005;19:389–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O'Reilly MF, Oliva D. Extending microswitch-based programs for people with multiple disabilities: use of words and choice opportunities. Res Dev Disabil 2003;24:139–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheslock MA, Barton-Hulsey A, Romski MA, Sevcik RA. Using a speech-generating device to enhance communicative abilities for an adult with moderate intellectual disability. Intellect Dev Disabil 2008;46:376–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson G, Kottorp A, Borg J, Tham K. Relationship between occupational gaps in everyday life, depressive mood and life satisfaction after acquired brain injury. J Rehabil Med 2009;41:187–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetzroni OE. A positive behaviour support: a preliminary evaluation of a school-wide plan for implementing AAC in a school for students with intellectual disabilities. J Intellect Dev Disabil 2003;28:283–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higginbotham DJ, Kim KE, Scally C. The effect of the communication output method on augmented interaction. Augment Altern Commun 2007;23:140–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Sandt-Koenderman WME, Wiegers J, Wielaert SM, Duivenvoorden HJ, Ribbers GM. A computerised communication aid in severe aphasia: an exploratory study. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:1701–1709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham J, McDonnell A, Easton A, Sturmey P. Social validation data on three methods of physical restraint: views of consumers, staff and students. Res Dev Disabil 2003;24:307–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazdin AE. Behavior modification in applied settings. 6th ed. New York: Wadsworth; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy CH. Single case designs for educational research. New York: Allyn & Bacon; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, O'Reilly MF, Singh NN, Groeneweg J, Bosco A, Tota A, Smaldone A, Stasolla F, Manfredi F, Baccani S, Pidala S. A social validation assessment of microswitch-based programs for persons with multiple disabilities employing teacher trainees and parents as rates. J Dev Phys Disabil 2006;18:383–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar