840
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Papers

Responsiveness of the Seated Postural Control Measure and the Level of Sitting Scale in children with neuromotor disorders

&
Pages 473-482 | Accepted 01 Oct 2010, Published online: 08 Jun 2011

References

  • Fuhrer MJ. Assessing the efficacy, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of assistive technology interventions for enhancing mobility. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2007;2:149–158.
  • Hoenig H, Giacobbi P, Levy CE. Methodological challenges confronting researchers of wheeled mobility aids and other assistive technologies. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2007;2:159–168.
  • Sprigle S, Cohen L, Davis K. Establishing seating and wheeled mobility research priorities. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2007;2:169–172.
  • Thomas-Stonnell N, Johnson P, Rumney P, Wright V, Oddson B. An evaluation of the responsiveness of a comprehensive set of outcome measures for children and adolescents with traumatic brain injuries. Pediatr Rehabil 2006;9:14–23.
  • Jette AM, Haley SM. Contemporary measurement techniques for rehabilitation outcomes assessment. J Rehabil Med 2005;37:339–345.
  • McDonald RL, Wirz S, Surtees R. The International Classification for Functioning, Disability and Health provides a model for adaptive seating for children with cerebral palsy. Br J Occup Ther 2004;67:293–302.
  • Majnemer A, Limperopoulos C. Importance of outcome determination in paediatric rehabilitation. Dev Med Child Neurol 2002;44:773–777.
  • Smith RO. Measuring the outcomes of assistive technology: challenge and innovation. Assist Technol 1996;8:71–81.
  • DeRuyter F. Evaluating outcomes in assistive technology: do we understand the commitment? Assist Technol 1995;7:3–8.
  • Harris SR. Functional abilities in context. Contemporary management of motor control problems. Proceedings of the II step conference. In: Lister MJ, editor. Alexandria, VA: Foundation for Physical Therapy; 1991. 253–259.
  • Oldridge NB. Outcomes measurement: health-related quality of life. Assist Technol 1996;8:82–93.
  • Majnemer A, Mazer B. New directions in the outcome evaluation of children with cerebral palsy. Semin Pediatri Neurol 2004;11:11–17.
  • Lenker JA, Scherer MJ, Fuhrer MJ. Psychometric and administrative properties of measures used in assistive technology device outcomes research. Assist Technol 2005;17:7–22.
  • Sprigle S. Research priorities: seating and positioning. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2007;2:181–187.
  • Rosenbaum PL, Russell DJ, Cadman DT, Gowland C, Jarvis S, Hardy S. Issues in measuring change in motor function in children with cerebral palsy: a special communication. Phys Ther 1990;70:125–131.
  • Ketelaar M, Vermeer A, Helders PJ. Functional motor abilities of children with cerebral palsy: a systematic literature review of assessment measures. Clin Rehabil 1998;12:369–380.
  • Westcott SL, Pax Lowes L, Richardson PK. Evaluation of postural stability in children: current theories and assessment tools. Phys Ther 1997;77:629–645.
  • Stratford PW, Binkley FM, Riddle DL. Health status measures: strategies and analytic methods for assessing change scores. Phys Ther 1996;76:1109–1123.
  • Sprigle S. State of the science on wheeled mobility and seating measuring the health, activity and participation of wheelchair users. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2007;2:133–135.
  • Gagnon B, Noreau L, Vincent C. Reliability of the seated postural control measure for adult wheelchair users. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:1479–1491.
  • Mortenson WB, Miller WC, Auger C. Issues for the selection of wheelchair-specific activity and participation outcome measures: a review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;89:1177–1186.
  • Scheuringer M, Grill E, Boldt C, Mittrach R, Müllner P, Stucki G. Systematic review of measures and their concepts used in published studies focusing on rehabilitation in the acute hospital and in early post-acute rehabilitation facilities. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:419–429.
  • Tyson S. A systematic review of methods to measure posture. Phys Ther Rev 2003;8:45–50.
  • Mulcahy C, Pountney T, Nelman R, Green E, Gillington G. Adaptive seating for the motorically handicapped – problems, a solution, assessment and prescription. Physiotherapy 1988;74:531–536.
  • Fife S, Roxborough LA, Story M, Field D, Harris SR, Armstrong RW. Reliability of a measure to assess outcomes of adaptive seating in children with neuromotor disabilities. Can J Rehabil 1993;7:11–13.
  • Fife SE, Roxborough LA, Armstrong RW, Harris SR, Gregson JL, Field D. Development of a clinical measure of postural control for assessment of adaptive seating in children with neuromotor disabilities. Phys Ther 1991;71:981–993.
  • McDonald R, Surtees R. Longitudinal study evaluating a seating system using a sacral pad and kneeblock for children with cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:1041–1047.
  • Gagnon B, Vincent C, Noreau L. Adaptation of a seated postural control measure for adult wheelchair users. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:951–959.
  • Barlow I. Reliability and clinical utility of selected outcome measures with adult clients of seating clinics [Masters thesis]. London, ON: University of Western Ontario; 1998. 158.
  • Portney LG, Watkins, M.P. Foundations of clinical research. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River: NJ Pearson Prentice Hall; 2009. 77–118, 644–658.
  • Jette AM, Tao W, Norweg A, Haley S. Interpreting rehabilitation outcome measurements. J Rehabil Med 2007;39:585–590.
  • Rothstein JM, Campbell SK, Echternach JL, Jette AM, Knecht HG, Rose SJ. Standards for tests and measurements in physical therapy practice. Phys Ther 1991;71:589–622.
  • Sim J, Arnell P. Measurement validity in physical therapy research. Phys Ther 1993;73:48–61.
  • World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001.
  • Chung J, Evans J, Lee C, Lee J, Rabbani Y, Roxborough L, Harris SR. Effectiveness of adaptive seating on sitting posture and postural control in children with cerebral palsy. Pediatr Phys Ther 2008;20:303–317.
  • Liang, MH. Evaluating measurement responsiveness. J Rheumatol 1995;22:1191–1192.
  • Stratford P, Spadoni G, Kennedy D, Westaway MD, Alcock GK. Seven points to consider when investigating a measure's ability to detect change. Physiother Can 2002;54:16–24.
  • Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G. Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:171–178.
  • Finch E, Brooks D, Stratford PW, Mayo NE. Physical rehabilitation outcome measures: a guide to enhanced clinical decision making. Toronto: Canadian Physiotherapy Association; 2002.
  • Linder-Lucht M, Othmer V, Walther M, Vry J, Michaelis U, Stein S, Weissenmayer H, Korinthenberg R, Mall V, Gross Motor Function Measure-Traumatic Brain Injury Study Group. Validation of the Gross Motor Function Measure for use in children and adolescents with traumatic brain injuries. Paediatrics 2007;120:880–886.
  • Schmitt J, DiFabio RP. The validity of prospective and retrospective global change criterion measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:2270–2276.
  • Beaton DE. Understanding the relevance of measured change through studies of responsiveness. Spine 2000;25:3192–3199.
  • Russell DJ, Rosenbaum PL, Cadman DT, Gowland C, Hardy S, Jarvis S. The Gross Motor Function Measure: A means to evaluate the effects of physical therapy. Dev Med Child Neurol 1989;31:341–352.
  • Roxborough L, Ott B. Item analysis of the Seated Postural Control Measure. Dev Med Child Neurol 2003;43 (Suppl 94):54.
  • Roxborough LA. Preliminary item and subscale analysis of the seated postural control measure [Masters thesis]. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia; 1996. 91
  • Roxborough L, Fife S, Story M, Armstrong R. Seated Postural Control Measure Manual. Research version ed. Vancouver: Sunny Hill Health Centre for Children; 1994.
  • Predictive Analytics Software (formerly SPSS Statistics), 2008. Internet. http://www.spss.com/software/ . Last accessed 21 November 2009.
  • Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988.
  • Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Katz JN, Wright JG. A taxonomy for responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol 2001;54:1204–1217.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.