References
- Light J. Interaction involving individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems: state of the art and future directions. Aug Alt Comm 1988;4:66–82.
- Statistics Canada. Participation and activity limitation survey 2006: analytical report, Tech. rep., Ministry of Industry, Social and Aboriginal Statistics Division. Ottawa, Ontario2007.
- Lund S, Light J. Long-term outcomes for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: part II–communicative interaction. Aug Alt Comm 2007;23:1–15.
- Leung B, Chau T. A multiple camera tongue switch for a child with severe spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2010;5:58–68.
- Lancioni G, Bellini D, Oliva D, Singh N, O'Reilly M, Sigafoos J. Camera-based microswitch technology for eyelid and mouth responses of persons with profound multiple disabilities: two case studies. Res Dev Disabil 2010;31:1509–1514. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2010.06.006.
- Lancioni G, O'Reilly M, Oliva D, Coppa M. A microswitch for vocalization responses to foster environmental control in children with multiple disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res 2001;45:271–275.
- Lancioni G, Singh N, O'Reilly M, Sigafoos J, Green V, Chiapparino C, Stasolla F, Oliva D. A voice-detecting sensor and a scanning keyboard emulator to support word writing by two boys with extensive motor disabilities. Res Dev Disabil 2009;30:203–209.
- Falk T, Chan J, Duez P, Teachman G, Chau T. Augmentative communication based on realtime vocal cord vibration detection. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2010;18: 159–163.
- Chan J, Falk T, Teachman G, Morin-McKee J, Chau T. Evaluation of a non-invasive vocal cord vibration switch as an alternative access pathway for an individual with hypotonic cerebral palsy – a case study. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2010;5:69–78.
- Lu E, Falk T, Teachman G, Chau T. Assessing the viability of a vocal cord vibration switch for four children with multiple disabilities. Open Rehabil J 2010;3:55–61.
- Vanderheiden G. Nonvocal communication techniques and aids for the severely physically handicapped. Baltimore: University Park Press1976. Ch. Providing the child with a means to indicate. pp. 20–76.
- LeBlanc M, Barker MR. A comparative study of control and display design principles which affect efficient use of communication aids by the severely physically disabled: final Report, Tech. rep. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education1981.
- Schlosser R. The efficacy of augmentative and alternative communication: toward evidence-based practice. San Diego, CA: Academic Press2003. pp 13–26.
- Wellings D, Unsworth J. Fortnightly review: environmental control systems for people with a disability: an update. BMJ 1997;315:409.
- Ouellette J, Wood W. Habit and intention in everyday life: the multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psychol Bull 1998;124:54–74.
- Aarts H, Verplanken B, Knippenberg A. Predicting behavior from actions in the past: repeated decision making or a matter of habit? J Appl Soc Psychol 1998;28:1355–1374.
- Angelo J. Comparison of three computer scanning modes as an interface method for persons with cerebral palsy. Am J Occup Ther 1992;46:217–222.
- Patel R. Phonatory control in adults with cerebral palsy and severe dysarthria. Aug Alt Comm 2002;18:2–10.
- Scherer M. Outcomes of assistive technology use on quality of life. Disabil Rehabil 1996;18:439–448.
- Schlosser R. The efficacy of augmentative and alternative communication: toward evidence-based practice. San Diego, CA: Academic Press2003. Ch. Determining the social validity of AAC interventions. pp. 203–229.