2,263
Views
29
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Articles

An overview of systematic reviews of adaptive seating interventions for children with cerebral palsy: where do we go from here?

Pages 104-111 | Received 26 Feb 2011, Accepted 04 Jun 2011, Published online: 30 Aug 2011

References

  • Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 1996;312:71–72.
  • Surveillance of Cerebral Palsy in Europe. Surveillance of cerebral palsy in Europe (SCPE): a collaboration of cerebral palsy surveys and registers. Dev Med Child Neuro 2000;42:816–824.
  • Cook AM, Miller Polgar J. Cook and Hussey’s Assistive Technologies: Principles and Practice. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2007.
  • Reid D, Rigby P. Towards improving anterior pelvic stabilization devices for paediatric wheelchair users with cerebral palsy. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation 1996;9:147–158.
  • Saarni L, Nygård CH, Kaukiainen A, Rimpelä A. Are the desks and chairs at school appropriate? Ergonomics 2007;50:1561–1570.
  • Milanese S, Grimmer K. School furniture and the user population: an anthropometric perspective. Ergonomics 2004;47:416–426.
  • Murphy S, Buckle P, Stubbs D. A cross-sectional study of self-reported back and neck pain among English schoolchildren and associated physical and psychological risk factors. Appl Ergon 2007;38:797–804.
  • Koskelo R, Vuorikari K, Hänninen O. Sitting and standing postures are corrected by adjustable furniture with lowered muscle tension in high-school students. Ergonomics 2007;50:1643–1656.
  • Smith-Zuzovsky N, Exner CE. The effect of seated positioning quality on typical 6- and 7-year-old children’s object manipulation skills. Am J Occup Ther 2004;58:380–388.
  • Sents BE, Marks HE. Changes in preschool children’s IQ scores as a function of positioning. Am J Occup Ther 1989;43:685–687.
  • Trevelyan FC, Legg SJ. Back pain in school children–where to from here? Appl Ergon 2006;37:45–54.
  • Hakala P, Rimpelä A, Salminen JJ, Virtanen SM, Rimpelä M. Back, neck, and shoulder pain in Finnish adolescents: national cross sectional surveys. BMJ 2002;325:743.
  • Ostensjø S, Carlberg EB, Vøllestad NK. The use and impact of assistive devices and other environmental modifications on everyday activities and care in young children with cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:849–861.
  • Korpela R, Seppänen RL, Koivikko M. Technical aids for daily activities: a regional survey of 204 disabled children. Dev Med Child Neurol 1992;34:985–998.
  • Ryan SE, Campbell KA. Evaluation of a parent-report diary of the home use of assistive devices by young children with cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2009;4:189–197.
  • Palisano RJ, Tieman BL, Walter SD, Bartlett DJ, Rosenbaum PL, Russell D, Hanna SE. Effect of environmental setting on mobility methods of children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 2003;45:113–120.
  • Kelsey JL, Whittemore AS, Evans AS, Thompson WD. Methods in Observational Epidemiology (2nd edition). 1996. Oxford University Press: New York, NY.
  • Glanville J, Sowden AJ. Undertaking Systematic Reviews of Research on Effectiveness. CRD’s Guidance for those Carrying Out or Commissioning Reviews. CRD Report Number 4 (2nd Edition). NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York. March 2001.
  • Henderson S, Skelton H, Rosenbaum P. Assistive devices for children with functional impairments: impact on child and caregiver function. Dev Med Child Neurol 2008;50:89–98.
  • American Academy for Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Medicine (AACPDM) Treatment Outcomes Committee. AACPDM Methodology to Develop Systematic Reviews of Treatment Interventions (Revision 1.1, Version 2004). [Internet]. Retrieved from www.aacpdm.org/resources/systematicReviewsMethodology.pdf on January 24, 2011.
  • U.S. Department of Education. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act 2004. [Internet]. Retreived from: http://idea.ed.gov/explore/view/p/%2Croot%2Cstatute%2CI%2CA%2C602% 2C1%2C on January 24, 2011.
  • Palisano RJ, Rosenbaum P, Bartlett D, Livingston MH. Content validity of the expanded and revised Gross Motor Function Classification System. Dev Med Child Neurol 2008;50:744–750.
  • Palisano R, Rosenbaum P, Walter S, Russell D, Wood E, Galuppi B. Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 1997;39:214–223.
  • Wood E, Rosenbaum P. The gross motor function classification system for cerebral palsy: a study of reliability and stability over time. Dev Med Child Neurol 2000;42:292–296.
  • Oxman AD, Guyatt GH. Validation of an index of the quality of review articles. J Clin Epidemiol 1991;44:1271–1278.
  • Harris SR, Roxborough L. Efficacy and effectiveness of physical therapy in enhancing postural control in children with cerebral palsy. Neural Plast 2005;12:229–43; discussion 263.
  • Chung J, Evans J, Lee C, Lee J, Rabbani Y, Roxborough L, Harris SR. Effectiveness of adaptive seating on sitting posture and postural control in children with cerebral palsy. Pediatr Phys Ther 2008;20:303–317.
  • Stavness C. The effect of positioning for children with cerebral palsy on upper-extremity function: a review of the evidence. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 2006;26:39–53.
  • McNamara L, Casey J. Seat inclinations affect the function of children with cerebral palsy: a review of the effect of different seat inclines. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2007;2:309–318.
  • Roxborough L. Review of the efficacy and effectiveness of adaptive seating for children with cerebral palsy. Assist Technol 1995;7:17–25.
  • Michael SM, Porter D, Pountney TE. Tilted seat position for non-ambulant individuals with neurological and neuromuscular impairment: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil 2007;21:1063–1074.
  • Farley R, Clark J, Davidson C, Evans G, MacLennan K, Michael S, Morrow M, Thorpe S. What is the effectiveness of postural management? Int J Ther Rehabil 2003;10:449–455.
  • Steultjens EM, Dekker J, Bouter LM, van de Nes JC, Lambregts BL, van den Ende CH. Occupational therapy for children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil 2004;18:1–14.
  • Reid D, Rigby P. Towards improving anterior pelvic stabilization devices for paediatric wheelchair users with cerebral palsy. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation 1996;9:147–158.
  • Ryan S, Snider-Riczker P, Rigby P. Community-based performance of a pelvic stabilization device for children with spasticity. Assist Technol 2005;17:37–46.
  • Boehme R. Improving Upper Body Control: An approach to assessment and treatment of tonal dysfunction. Therapy Skill Builders 1998, Tucson, AZ.
  • Sackett, D. Rules of evidence and clinical recommendations on the use of antithrombotic agents. Chest 1986;89(2 Suppl):2S–3S.
  • Sackett D, Strauss S, Richardson S, Rosenberg W, Haynes R. Evidence-based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM 2000; Second Edition. Edinburgh, Scotland.
  • Law M, Stewart D, Pollock N, Letts L, Bosh J, Westmorland M. Guidelines for critical review form–quantitative studies 1998. [Internet]. Retreived from www.fhs.mcmaster.ca/rehab/ebp/pdf/ quanguidelines.pdf on January 24, 2011.
  • Horner R, Carr E, Halle J, McGee G, Odom S, Wolery M. The use of single subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children 2005;71:165–180.
  • Jadad AR. Randomised controlled trials: A user’s guide. [Internet]. Retrieved from http://www.cgmh.org.tw/intr/intr5/c6700/OBGYN/F/Randomized%20tial/chapter1.html on January 24, 2011.
  • World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health–Child and Youth Version. (October 2007). Stylus Publishing LLC, Sterling, VA 20166–2012.
  • World Health Organization. (2002). [Internet].Toward a common language for functioning, disability, and health. Geneva: WHO. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/training/icfbeginnersguide.pdf on January 24, 2011.
  • McDonald R, Surtees R, Wirz S. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health provides a model for adaptive seating interventions for children with cerebral palsy. Br J Occup Therapy 2004:293–302.
  • Rosenbaum P, Stewart D. The World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health: a model to guide clinical thinking, practice and research in the field of cerebral palsy. Semin Pediatr Neurol 2004;11:5–10.
  • Darrah J. Using the ICF as a framework for clinical decision making in pediatric physical therapy. Advances in Physiotherapy 2008;10:146–151.
  • McDougall J, Wright V, Rosenbaum P. The ICF model of functioning and disability: incorporating quality of life and human development. Dev Neurorehabil 2010;13:204–211.
  • Simeonsson RJ, Leonardi M, Lollar D, Bjorck-Akesson E, Hollenweger J, Martinuzzi A. Applying the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) to measure childhood disability. Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:602–610.
  • Fuhrer MJ. Assistive technology outcomes research: challenges met and yet unmet. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001;80:528–535.
  • Bartlett DJ, Macnab J, Macarthur C, Mandich A, Magill-Evans J, Young NL, Beal D, et al. Advancing rehabilitation research: an interactionist perspective to guide question and design. Disabil Rehabil 2006;28:1169–1176.
  • Fuhrer MJ, Jutai JW, Scherer MJ, DeRuyter F. A framework for the conceptual modelling of assistive technology device outcomes. Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:1243–1251.
  • Scherer MJ, Jutai JW, Fuhrer MJ, Demers L. Deruyter F.A framework for modelling the selection of assistive technology devices (ATDs). Disabil Rehabil: Assistive Technol 2007;2:1–8
  • Ryan SE, Campbell KA, Rigby PJ, Fishbein-Germon B, Hubley D, Chan B. The impact of adaptive seating devices on the lives of young children with cerebral palsy and their families. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009;90:27–33.
  • Lenker JA, Fuhrer MJ, Jutai, JW, Demers L, Scherer MJ, DeRuyter F. Treatment Theory, Intervention Specification, and Treatment Fidelity in Assistive Technology Outcomes Research. Assist Technol; 2010;22:3:129–138.
  • Lenker JA, Paquet VL. A new conceptual model for assistive technology outcomes research and practice. Assist Technol 2004;16:1–10.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.