Computer-based assistive technology device for use by children with physical disabilities: a cross-sectional study

References

• Lidström H, Ahlsten G, Hemmingsson H. The influence of ICT on the activity patterns of children with physical disabilities outside school. Child Care Health Dev 2011;37:313–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpe A, Harder K, Tam C, Reid D. Perceptions of writing and communication aid use among children with a physical disability. Assist Technol 2010;22:87–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredriksson U, Gajek E, Jedeskog G. Ways to use ICT in schools to optimize the impact on teaching and learning. Acta Didact Napocensia 2009;2:21–32.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer M, Jutai J, Fuhrer M, Demers L, Deruyter F. A framework for modelling the selection of assistive technology devices (ATDs). Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2007;2:1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cox M, Webb M, Abbot C, Blakely B, Beauchamp T, Rhodes V. A review of the research literature relating to ICT and attainment. Coventry: British Educational Communications and Technology Agency; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Hasselbring TS, Glaser CH. Use of computer technology to help students with special needs. Future Child 2000;10:102–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handley-More D, Deitz J, Billingsley FF, Coggins TE. Facilitating written work using computer word processing and word prediction. Am J Occup Ther 2003;57:139–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murchland S, Parkyn H. Using assistive technology for schoolwork: the experience of children with physical disabilities. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2010;5:438–447.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lidström H, Borgestig M. Assistive technology devices in computer activities. In: Eliasson A, Burtner P, editors. Improving hand function in cerebral palsy. London: Mac Keith Press; 2008. pp 371–384.
   Google Scholar
• Salminen A: European research related to assistve technology for disabled children. Technol Disabil 2008,20:173–178.
   Google Scholar
• Craddock G. The AT continuum in education: novice to power user. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2006;1:17–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fredriksson U, Gajek E, Jedeskog G. Ways to use ICT in schools to optimize the impact on teaching and learning. Acta Didact Napocensia 2009;2.
   Google Scholar
• Brodin J, Renblad K: How many positive results on inclusion do we need to make changes? In: Emiliano PL, et al., editors. Assistive technology from adapted equipment to inclusive environments AAATE 2009, vol. 25. Netherlands: IOS Press; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Subrahmanyam K, Kraut RE, Greenfield PM, Gross EF. The impact of home computer use on children’s activities and development. Future Child 2000;10:123–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priest N, May E. Laptop computers and children with disabilities. Aust Occup Ther J 2001;48:11.
   Google Scholar
• Hoppestad. Inadequacies in computer access using assistive technology devices in profoundly disabled individuals: An overview of the current literature. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2007;2:189–199
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Unsworth C, Townsend M. Occupational therapists’ skills and attitudes regarding use of computers and assisistive technology. Occup Ther Int 1997;4:52–65.
   Google Scholar
• Long TM, Woolverton M, Perry DF, Thomas MJ. Training needs of pediatric occupational therapists in assistive technology. Am J Occup Ther 2007;61:345–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmingsson H, Lidström H, Nygård L. Use of assistive technology devices in mainstream schools: students’ perspective. Am J Occup Ther 2009;63:463–472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey D, Sale P. Practical considerations in the use of technology to facilitate the inclusion of students with severe disabilities. Technol Disabil 1994;3:77–86.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmingsson H, Gustavsson A, Townsend E. Students with disabilities participating in mainstream schools: Policies that promote and limit teacher and therapist cooperation. Disabil Soc 2007;22:383–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodin J, Fasth A. Habilitation, support and service for young people with motor disabilities. A Swedish perspective. Int J Rehabil Res 2001;24:309–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlemeier H, Hemker B. The impact of computer use at home on students’ Internet skills. Comput Educ 2007;49:460–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SIAT. Så många barn har..någon långvarig sjukdom eller funktionshinder. Statistisksammanställning. So many children have...a long-term ilness or a disability. Statistical summery. Stockholm: SIAT SIoAT; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Lidström H, Ahlsten G, Hemmingsson H. The influence of ICT on the activity patterns of children with physical disabilities outside school. Child Care Health Dev 2011;37:313–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mediarådet. Ungar & Medier: Fakta om barns och ungas användning och upplevelser av medier [Kids & Media: Facts about children’ and youth’ use and experience of media]. Stockholm: Kultur-och Utbildningsdepartementet; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. Sammanfattning av enkätstudie: IT och skola 2005 [Conclusion of the survey: IT at school 2005]. Stockholm; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmingsson H, Jonsson H. An occupational perspective on the concept of participation in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health–some critical remarks. Am J Occup Ther 2005;59:569–576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simeonsson RJ, Carlsson D, Huntington G, McMillen J, Brent L. Participation of students with disabilities: a national survey of participation in school activities. Chapel Hill, NC: Center FPGCD; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Wehmeyer M, Kelchner M. The Arc’s Self-Determination Scale (Adolescent version). Arlington, TX: The Arc of the United States; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Almqvist L, Granlund M. Participation in school environment of children and youth with disabilities: a person-oriented approach. Scand J Psychol 2005;46:305–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson L, Granlund M. Percieved participation. A comparison of students with disabilities and students without disabilities. Scand J Disabil Res 2004;6:205–223.
   Google Scholar
• Granlund M, Björck-Åkesson E. Integrating training in family-centered practices in context: Implications for implementing change activities. Infant Young Child 2000;12:46–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polit DF, Beck CT. Essentials of nursing research. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007;60:34–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson KL, Dudgeon B, Kuehn C, Walker W. Assistive technology use among adolescents and young adults with spina bifida. Am J Public Health 2007;97:330–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law M, King G, King S, Kertoy M, Hurley P, Rosenbaum P, Young N, Hanna S. Patterns of participation in recreational and leisure activities among children with complex physical disabilities. Dev Med Child Neurol 2006;48:337–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Østansjø S, Brogren Carlberg E, Vøllestad N: The use and impact of assistive devices and other environmental modifications on everyday activities and care in young children with cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:849–861.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skär L. Disabled children’s perceptions of technical aids, assistance and peers in play situations. Scand J Caring Sci 2002;16:27–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copley J, Ziviani J. Barriers to the use of assistive technology for children with multiple disabilities. Occup Ther Int 2004;11:229–243.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar