Transfer of tactile input from an artificial hand to the forearm: experiments in amputees and able-bodied volunteers

References

• Johansson RS, Flanagan JR. Coding and use of tactile signals from the fingertips in object manipulation tasks. Nat Rev Neurosci 2009;10:345–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson JJ. Observations on active touch. Psychol Rev 1962;69:477–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundborg G. Nerve injury and repair. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone;1988.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson RS. Sensory and memory information in the control of dexterous manipulation. In: Lacquaniti F, Viviani P, editors. Neural bases of motor behaviour. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers;1996. pp. 205–260.
   Google Scholar
• Vallbo AB, Johansson RS. Properties of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the human hand related to touch sensation. Hum Neurobiol 1984;3:3–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lundborg G, Waites A, Björkman A, Rosén B, Larsson EM. Functional magnetic resonance imaging shows cortical activation on sensory stimulation of an osseointegrated prosthetic thumb. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2006;40:234–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundborg G, Rosén B. Sensory substitution in prosthetics. Hand Clin 2001;17:481–8, ix.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pylatiuk C, Schulz S, Döderlein L. Results of an Internet survey of myoelectric prosthetic hand users. Prosthet Orthot Int 2007;31:362–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyberd PJ, Wartenberg C, Sandsjö L, Jönsson S, Gow D, Frid J, Almström C, Sperling L. Survey of upper-extremity prosthesis users in Sweden and the United Kingdom. J Prosthet Orthot 2007;19:55.
   Google Scholar
• Puchhammer G. The tactile slip sensor: Integration of a miniaturized sensory device on a myoelectric hand. Orthopädie-Technik Quarterly 2000;1:7–12.
   Google Scholar
• Parker P, Englehart K, Hudgins B. Myoelectric signal processing for control of powered limb prostheses. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2006;16:541–548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biddiss E, Beaton D, Chau T. Consumer design priorities for upper limb prosthetics. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2007;2:346–357.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Atkins DJ, Heard DCY, Donovan WH. Epidemiologic overview of individuals with upper-limb loss and their reported research priorities. J Prosthet Orthot 1996;8:2–11.
   Google Scholar
• Hernandez Arieta A, Yokoi H, Arai T, Yu W. Study on the Effects of Electrical Stimulation on the Pattern Recognition for an EMG Prosthetic Application. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2005;7:6919–6922.
   Google Scholar
• Shannon GF. A myoelectrically-controlled prosthesis with sensory feedback. Med Biol Eng Comput 1979;17:73–80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Geng B, Yoshida K, Jensen W. Impacts of selected stimulation patterns on the perception threshold in electrocutaneous stimulation. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2011;8:9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cipriani C, Zaccone F, Micera S, Carrozza MC. On the shared control of an EMG-controlled prosthetic hand: Analysis of user-prosthesis interaction. IEEE Trans Robot 2008;24:170–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pons JL, Ceres R, Rocon E, Reynaerts D, Saro B, Levin S, Van Moorleghem W. Objectives and technological approach to the development of the multifunctional MANUS upper limb prosthesis. Robotica 2005;23:301–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pylatiuk C, Mounier S, Kargov A, Schulz S, Bretthauer G. Progress in the development of a multifunctional hand prosthesis. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2004;6:4260–4263.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee A, Chaubey P, Martin J, Thakor N. Testing a prosthetic haptic feedback simulator with an interactive force matching task. J Prosthet Orthot 2008;20:27.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders I, Vijayakumar S. The role of feed-forward and feedback processes for closed-loop prosthesis control. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2011;8:60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundborg G, Rosén B, Lindberg S. Hearing as substitution for sensation: a new principle for artificial sensibility. J Hand Surg Am 1999;24:219–224.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meek SG, Jacobsen SC, Goulding PP. Extended physiologic taction: design and evaluation of a proportional force feedback system. J Rehabil Res Dev 1989;26:53–62.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patterson PE, Katz JA. Design and evaluation of a sensory feedback system that provides grasping pressure in a myoelectric hand. J Rehabil Res Dev 1992;29:1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim K, Colgate JE, Santos-Munné JJ, Makhlin A, Peshkin MA. On the design of miniature haptic devices for upper extremity prosthetics. IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron 2010;15:27–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuiken TA, Marasco PD, Lock BA, Harden RN, Dewald JP. Redirection of cutaneous sensation from the hand to the chest skin of human amputees with targeted reinnervation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007;104:20061–20066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davalli A, Sacchetti R, Fanin S, Avanzolini G, Urbano E. Biofeedback for upper limb myoelectric prostheses. Technol Disabil 2000;13:161–172.
   Google Scholar
• Antfolk C, Balkenius C, Rosén B, Lundborg G, Sebelius F. SmartHand tactile display: a new concept for providing sensory feedback in hand prostheses. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2010;44:50–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antfolk C, Balkenius C, Lundborg G, Rosén B, Sebelius F. Design and technical construction of a tactile display for sensory feedback in a hand prosthesis system. Biomed Eng Online 2010;9:50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein S. Intensive and extensive aspects of tactile sensitivity as a function of body part, sex, and laterality. In: Kenshalo DR, editor. The skin senses. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas; 1968. pp. 195–218.
   Google Scholar
• Cutkosky MR. On grasp choice, grasp models, and the design of hands for manufacturing tasks. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 1989;5:269–279.
   Google Scholar
• Dario P. Tactile sensing – technology and applications. Sensor Actuator Phys 1991;26:251–256.
   Google Scholar
• Howe RD. Tactile sensing and control of robotic manipulation. Adv Robot 1994;8:245–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edin BB, Ascari L, Beccai L, Roccella S, Cabibihan JJ, Carrozza MC. Bio-inspired sensorization of a biomechatronic robot hand for the grasp-and-lift task. Brain Res Bull 2008;75:785–795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chappell PH. Making sense of artificial hands. J Med Eng Technol 2011;35:1–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ehrsson HH, Rosén B, Stockselius A, Ragnö C, Köhler P, Lundborg G. Upper limb amputees can be induced to experience a rubber hand as their own. Brain 2008;131:3443–3452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrsson HH, Spence C, Passingham RE. That’s my hand! Activity in premotor cortex reflects feeling of ownership of a limb. Science 2004;305:875–877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosén B, Ehrsson HH, Antfolk C, Cipriani C, Sebelius F, Lundborg G. Referral of sensation to an advanced humanoid robotic hand prosthesis. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2009;43:260–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riso RR. Strategies for providing upper extremity amputees with tactile and hand position feedback–moving closer to the bionic arm. Technol Health Care 1999;7:401–409.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ramachandran VS. Behavioral and magnetoencephalographic correlates of plasticity in the adult human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993;90:10413–10420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björkman A, Weibull A, Olsrud J, Henrik Ehrsson H, Rosén B, Björkman-Burtscher IM. Phantom digit somatotopy: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in forearm amputees. Eur J Neurosci 2012;36:2098–2106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar