Technology as system innovation: a key informant interview study of the application of the diffusion of innovation model to telecare

References

• Wanless D. Securing the public health: taking a long term view. London: Department of Health; 2004
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. Building telecare in England. London: Department of Health; 2005
   Google Scholar
• Lewin D, Adshead S, Glennon B, Williamson B. Assisted living technologies for older and disabled people in 2030: a final report to Ofcom. London: Plum Consulting; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Cohen SA. A review of demographic and infrastructural factors and potential solutions to the physician and nursing shortage predicted to impact the growing US elderly population. J Publ Health Manage Pract 2009;15:352–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark M, Goodwin N. Sustaining innovation in telehealth and telecare: WSDAN briefing paper. London: King’s Fund; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Edwards W, Grinter R. At home with ubiquitous computing: seven challenges. In: Abowd G, Brumitt B, Shafer S, eds. Ubicomp 2001: ubiquitous computing. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag Berlin; 2001:256–72
   Google Scholar
• Martin S, Kelly S, Kernohan WG, et al. Smart home technologies for health and social care support. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; Issue 4. Art. no: CD006412. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006412.pub2
   Google Scholar
• Demiris G, Hensel BK. Technologies for an aging society: a systematic review of ‘smart home’ applications. Yearbook Med Inform 2008;32:33–40
   Google Scholar
• Oudshoorn N. Who cares? Telecare technologies and the transformation of healthcare. London: Routledge; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Percival J, Hanson J. Big brother or brave new world? Telecare and its implications for older people’s independence and social inclusion. Crit Soc Policy 2009;26:888–909
   Google Scholar
• Dourish P, Bell G. Divining a digital future: mess and mythology in ubiquitous computing. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 2011
   Google Scholar
• Peeters JM, de Veer AJE, van der Hoek L, Francke AL. Factors influencing the adoption of home telecare by elderly or chronically ill people: a national survey. J Clini Nurs 2012;21:3183--93
   Google Scholar
• Damodaran L, Olphert W. User responses to assisted living technologies (ALTs) – a review of the literature. J Integr Care 2010;18:25–32
   Google Scholar
• Oudshoorn N. How places matter: telecare technologies and the changing spatial dimensions of healthcare. Soc Stud Sci 2011;42:121–42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin N. The state of telehealth and telecare in the UK: prospects for integrated care. J Integr Care 2010;18:3–10
   Google Scholar
• Hendy J, Barlow J. The adoption of telecare in the community. Commun Pract 2012;85:41–3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barlow J, Bayer S, Curry R. Implementing complex innovations in fluid multi-stakeholder environments: experiences of ‘telecare’. Technovation 2006;26:396–406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May CR, Finch TL, Comford J, et al. Integrating telecare for chronic disease management in the community: what needs to be done? BMC Health Serv Res 2011;11:131–41. Available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/11/131 [last accessed 29 August 2012]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh T, Procter R, Rouncefield M, et al. ATHENE: assistive technologies for healthy living in elders: needs assessment by ethnography. 2011. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Digital Economy All Hands Meeting, Newcastle, UK. Available from: https://www.escholar.manchester.ac.uk/api/datastream?publicationPid=uk-ac-man-scw:142677&datastreamId=FULL-TEXT.PDF [last accessed 23 October 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Wherton J, Sugarhood P, Procter R, et al. Designing assistive living technologies ‘in the wild’: preliminary experiences with cultural probe methodology. BMC Med Res Methodol 2012;12:188. Available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/12/188 [last accessed 16 January 2013]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh T, Robert G, MacFarlane F, et al. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Quart 2004;82:581–629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert G, Greenhalgh T, Macfarlane F, Peacock R. Adopting and assimilating new non-pharmaceutical technologies into health care: a systematic review. J Health Serv Res Pol 2010;15:243–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams R, Stewart J, Slack R. Social learning in technological innovation: experimenting with information and communication technologies. Aldershot: Edward Elgar; 2005
   Google Scholar
• Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Manage Inf Syst Quart 1989;13:319–39
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg M. Implementing information systems in health care organizations: myths and challenges. Int J Med Informat 2001;64:143–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steventon A, Bardsley M, Billings J, et al. Effect of telecare on use of health and social care services: findings from the Whole Systems Demonstrator cluster randomised trial. Age Ageing 2013;42:501--8
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh T, Procter R, Wherton J, et al. The organising vision for telehealth and telecare: discourse analysis. Br Med J Open 2012;2:e001574. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001574
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar