Introducing the therapy outcome measure for AAC services in the context of a review of other measures

References

• KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”). The future of global healthcare delivery and management; 2010:1
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. Equity and excellence: liberating the NHS; 2010. Available from: http://www.dh.gov.uk/health/2011/07/liberating-the-nhs/ [last accessed 1 Aug 2013]
   Google Scholar
• NHS Constitution. 2012. Available from: http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_113613 [last accessed 1 Aug 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Pawson R. Assessing the quality of evidence in evidence-based policy: why, how and when? Working Paper No. 1. ESRC Research Methods Programme; 2003. Available from: www.ccsr.ac.uk/methods [last accessed 1 Aug 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh T, Wong G, Westhorp G, Pawson R. Protocol - realist and meta-narrative evidence synthesis: evolving Standards (RAMESES). BMC Med Res Methodol 2011;11:115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade DT. Measurement in neurological rehabilitation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1992
   Google Scholar
• Collis J, Bloch S. Survey of UK speech and language therapists’ assessment and treatment practices for people with progressive dysarthria. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2012;47:725–37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donabedian A. The quality of care: how can it be assessed? JAMA-J Am Med Assoc 1988;260:1743–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The NHS Atlas of Variation in Health Care Provision - November. 2010. Available from: www.rightcare.NHS.uk [last accessed 1 Aug 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Communication Matters -- Research Matters: an AAC Evidence Base Beyond the Anecdote. 2013. Available from: http://www.communicationmatters.org.uk/sites/default/files/downloads/projects/aac_evidence_base/2013_AAC_Evidence_Base_Beyond_the_Anecdote.pdf [last accessed 1 Aug 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Gorsky M. The National Health Service at 60: a review of the historiography. Soc Hist Med 2008;21:437–60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swage T. Clinical governance in healthcare practice. Oxford: Butterworth & Heinemann; 2000
   Google Scholar
• Bullivant J. Benchmarking in the UK NHS. Int J Health Care Quality Assurance 1996;9:9–14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bullivant J, Roberts A. Service benchmarking: to choose to improve. Health Service Manager (Special Report no. 14). Kingston upon Thames, UK: Croner Publications Ltd; 1996
   Google Scholar
• Franklin R. When will the penny drop: the state of benchmarking in the NHS? Manchester, UK: McClean Jones McCarthy Ltd; 1995:1–12
   Google Scholar
• Higgins I. Benchmarking in health care: a review of the literature. Austr Health Rev 1997;20:60–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ellis J. Sharing the evidence: clinical practice benchmarking to improve continuously the quality of care. J Adv Nurs 2000;32:215–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaruss JS, La Salle LS, Conture EG. Evaluating stuttering in young children: diagnostic data. Am J Speech-Lang Pathol 1998;7:62–76
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt J, Slater A. Outcome measures. Speech Lang Therapy Practice 1997;Autumn:4–6
   Google Scholar
• Fuhrer MJ, Jutai JW, Scherer MJ, DeRuyter F. A framework for the conceptual modelling of assistive technology device outcomes. Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:1243–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant for Augmentative and Alternative Communication. Department for Education. Available from: http://www.government-online.net/grant-for-augmentative-and-alternative-communication-department-for-education/ [last accessed 1 Aug 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Light J. Toward a definition of communicative competence for individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems. Augment Alternat Commun 1989;5:137–44
   Google Scholar
• Kagan A, Simmons-Mackie N, Rowland A, et al. Counting what counts: a framework for capturing real-life outcomes of aphasia intervention. Aphasiology 2008;22:258–80
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). World Health Organisation; 2001. Available from: http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/ [last accessed 1 Aug 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Enderby P. Outcome measures in speech therapy: impairment, disability, handicap, and distress. Health Trends 1992;24:61–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Enderby P, John A, Petherham B. Therapy outcome measures for rehabilitation professionals, 2nd ed. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2006
   Google Scholar
• John A, Enderby P, Hughes A. Benchmarking outcomes in dysphasia using the therapy outcome measure. Aphasiology 2005;19:165–78
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John A, Enderby P, Hughes A. Comparing Outcomes of Voice Therapy: a benchmarking study using the therapy outcome measure. J Voice 2005;19:114–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roulstone S, John A, Hughes A, Enderby P. Assessing the construct validity of the Therapy Outcome Measure for pre-school children with delayed speech and language. Adv Speech-Language Pathol 2004;6:230–6
   Google Scholar
• John A, Hughes A, Enderby P. Establishing clinician reliability using the Therapy Outcome Measure for the purpose of benchmarking services. Adv Speech-Language Pathol 2002;4:79–87
   Google Scholar
• John A, Enderby P. Reliability of speech and language professionals using Therapy Outcome Measures. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2000;35:287–302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enderby P, John A. Therapy outcome measures in speech and language therapy: comparing performance between different providers. Int J Lang Commun Disord 1999;34:417–29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton BB, Granger CV, Sherwin FS. A uniform national data system for medical rehabilitation. In: Fuhrer MJ, ed. Rehabilitation outcomes: analysis and measurement. Baltimore (MD): Brookes; 1987:137–47
   Google Scholar
• Stineman MG, Jette A, Fiedler R, et al. Impairment-specific dimensions within the functional independence measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997;78:636–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stineman MG, Shea JA, Jette A, et al. The functional independence measure: tests of scaling, assumptions, structure, and reliability across 20 diverse impairment categories. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:1101–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner Stokes L, Nyein K, Turner Stokes T, Gatehouse C. The UK FIM + FAM: development and evaluation. Clin Rehabil 1999;13:277–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright J. The functional assessment measure. The Center for Outcome Measurement in Brain Injury; 2000. Available from: http://www.tbims.org/combi/FAM (). Developer: Jerry Wright, MS, Clinical Research Manager, Rehabilitation Research Center, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center [last accessed 12 February 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Jenkinson C, Stewart-Brown S, Petersen S, Paice C. Assessment of the SF-36 version 2 in the United Kingdom. J Epidemiol Commun Health 1999;53:46–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burckhardt C, Anderson K. The quality of life scale (QOLS): reliability, validity, and utilization. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003;1:60. Available from: http://www.hqlo.com/content/1/1/60 [last accessed February 2012]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frisch M, Cornell J, Villanueva M, Retzlaff P. Clinical validation of the Quality of Life Inventory. A measure of life satisfaction for use in treatment planning and outcome assessment. Psychol Assess 1992;4:92–101
   Google Scholar
• Cytrynbaum S, Ginath Y, Birdwell J, Brandt L. Goal attainment scaling: a critical review. Eval Quart 1979;3:5–40
   Google Scholar
• Steenbeek D, Ketelaar M, Galama K, Willem K. Goal attainment scaling in paediatric rehabilitation: a critical review of the literature. Dev Med Child Neurol 2007;49:550–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser R. Goal attainment scaling as a clinical measurement technique in communication disorders: a critical review. J Commun Disord 2004;37:217–39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris M, Dodd KJ, Taylor NF. AusTOMs for physiotherapy. La Trobe University, Melbourne; 2004. ISBN 1-920948-54-6
   Google Scholar
• Perry A, Morris M, Unsworth C, et al. Therapy outcome measures for allied health practitioners in Australia: the AusTOMs. Int J Qual Health Care 2004;16:285–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry A, Skeat J. AusTOMs for speech pathology. La Trobe University, Melbourne; 2004. ISBN 1-920948-54-6
   Google Scholar
• Scott F, Unsworth CA, Fricke, J, Taylor N. Reliability of the Australian therapy outcome measures for occupational therapy self-care scale. Austra Occupat Therapy J 2006;53:265–76
   Google Scholar
• Skeat J, Perry A. Outcomes in practice: lessons from AusTOMs. Acquiring Knowledge Speech Language Hearing 2004;6:123–6
   Google Scholar
• Butler R, Gasson SL. Development of the self-image profile for adults [SIP-AD]. Eur J Psychol Assess 2006;22:52–8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos, Kelly, Bäckmark, Goodwill, Oyebode, Hallorann. Well being evaluation scale. Published by Pearson; 2011
   Google Scholar
• Law M, Baptiste S, McColl M, et al. The Canadian occupational performance measure: an outcome measure for occupational therapy. Can J Occupat Therap 1990;57:82–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Handbook: Online Communication Matrix (www.communicationmatrix.org) Oregon Health & Science University Charity Rowland, Ph.D
   Google Scholar
• Blackstone S, Hunt Berg M. Social networks: a communication inventory for individuals with severe communication challenges and their communication partners. Verona (WI): Attainment Company; 2003
   Google Scholar
• Blackstone SW. Augmentative Communication Inc. Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center on Communication Enhancement (AAC-RERC) [email protected]. www.augcominc.com
   Google Scholar
• Available from: http://www.homelessoutcomes.org.uk [last accessed 1 Aug 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Available from: http://www.outcomesstar.org.uk/who-we-are/ [last accessed 1 Aug 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Jutai J, Day H. Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS). Technol Disabil 2002;14:107–11
   Google Scholar
• Blackstone SW, Dowden P, Hunt Berg M, et al. Augmented communicators and their communication partners: a paradigm for successful outcomes. Conference Proceedings CSUN; 2001
   Google Scholar
• Robertson Z, Judge S. What's Your Name. Paper presented at the CM 2007 National symposium; University of Leicester, September 2007
   Google Scholar
• Light J. Toward a definition of communicative competence for individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems. Augment Alternat Commun 1989;5:137–44
   Google Scholar
• Edyburn DL. I can see the technology is being used, but is it effective? 17th Annual Closing the Gap Conference; Minneapolis, MN, October 21–23, 1999
   Google Scholar
• DeRuyter F. Evaluating outcomes in assistive technology: Do we understand the commitment? Assist Technol 1995;7:3–16
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hill KJ, Romich BA. A proposed standard for AAC and writing systems data logging for clinical intervention, outcomes measurement, and research. Proceedings of the RESNA ‘99 Annual Conference. Long Beach, CA; 1999. pp. 22–24
   Google Scholar
• Hill KJ, Romich BA. Language activity monitoring for school-aged children: improving AAC intervention. American Speech-Language-Hearing (ASHA) Convention; San Francisco, CA, November 18–21, 1999
   Google Scholar
• Hill KJ, Romich BA. Identifying AAC language representation methods used by persons with ALS. American Speech-Language-Hearing (ASHA) Convention; San Francisco, CA, November 18–21, 1999
   Google Scholar
• Light J, Binger C. Building communicative competence with individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication. Baltimore (MA): Paul H. Brooks Publishing Co; 1998
   Google Scholar
• Miller JF, Chapman RS. Systematic analysis of language transcripts (SALT). San Diego (CA): College Hill Press; 1983
   Google Scholar
• Romich BA, Hill KJ. A language activity monitor for AAC and writing systems: clinical intervention, outcomes measurement, and research. Proceedings of the RESNA ‘99 Annual Conference; Long Beach, California; 1999, pp. 19–21
   Google Scholar
• Johnson M, Elias A (2010 revised edition). East Kent outcome system for speech and language therapy. East Kent Coastal Primary Care Trust
   Google Scholar
• Johnson M. Outcome measurement: towards an interdisciplinary approach. Br J Therapy Rehabil 1997;4:472–8
   Google Scholar
• Miller A. Multidisciplinary outcome measurement: is it possible? Br J Therapy Rehabil 2000;7:362–5
   Google Scholar
• Beirne P. Implementation of the care aims model: challenges and opportunities. In: Anderson C, van der Gaag A, eds. Speech and language therapy: issues in professional practice. London: Whurr Publisher's Ltd; 2005
   Google Scholar
• Burns K. Focus on solutions: a health professional's guide. London: Whurr Publisher's Ltd; 1995
   Google Scholar
• Malcomess K. The care aims model. In: Anderson C, van der Gaag A, eds. Speech and language therapy: issues in professional practice. London: Whurr Publisher's Ltd; 2005
   Google Scholar
• Malcomess K. The reason for care. Roy Coll Speech Language Professional's Bull 2001;595:12–14
   Google Scholar
• Available from: http://www.education.gov.uk/schools/adminandfinance/schooladmin/ims/datacollections/EYFS Assessment scales reference sheet QCA/08/3657
   Google Scholar
• Available from: http://www.world-challenge.co.uk/pages/about_wc_asdan.asp [last accessed 1 Aug 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Available from: http://www.cityandguilds.com/ [last accessed 1 Aug 2013]
   Google Scholar