Extending technology-aided leisure and communication programs to persons with spinal cord injury and post-coma multiple disabilities

References

• Bauer SM, Elsaesser LJ, Arthanat S. Assistive technology device classification based upon the World Health Organization’s, International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2011;6:243–59
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borg J, Larson S, Östergren PO. The right to assistive technology: for whom, for what, and by whom? Disabil Soc 2011;26:151–67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chantry J, Dunford C. How do computer assistive technologies enhance participation in childhood occupations for children with multiple and complex disabilities? A review of the current literature. Br J Occup Ther 2010;73:351–65
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Joode EA, Van Boxtel MPJ, Verhey FR, et al. Use of assistive technology in cognitive rehabilitation: exploratory studies of the opinions and expectations of healthcare professionals and potential users. Brain Injury 2012;26:1257–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fried-Oken M, Beukelman DR, Hux K. Current and future AAC research considerations for adults with acquired cognitive and communication impairments. Assist Technol 2011;24:56–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Sigafoos J, O’Reilly MF, et al. Assistive technology: interventions for individuals with severe/profound and multiple disabilities. New York: Springer; 2012
   Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ. Assistive technologies and other supports for people with brain impairments. New York: Springer; 2012
   Google Scholar
• Wallace T, Bradshaw A. Technologies and strategies for people with communication problems following brain injury or stroke. NeuroRehabilitation 2011;28:199–209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arcuri F, Lucca, LF, Rosadini V, et al. Evaluation of autonomies in the severely brain injured: the Progression of Autonomies Scale. Funct Neurol 2013;28:29–38
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dillon CM, Carr JE. Assessing indices of happiness and unhappiness in individuals with developmental disabilities: a review. Behav Interven 2007;22:229–44
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matheson L. Executive dysfunction, severity of traumatic brain injury, and IQ in workers with disabilities. Work 2010;36:413–22
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Medley AR, Powell T. Motivational interviewing to promote self-awareness and engagement following acquired brain injury: a conceptual review. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2010;20:481–508
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunderland N, Catalano T, Kendall E. Missing discourses: concepts of joy and happiness in disability. Disabil Soc 2009;24:703–14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor JL, Hodapp RM. Doing nothing: adults with disabilities with no daily activities and their siblings. Am J Intellect Develop Disabil 2012;117:67–79
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wehmeyer ML, Palmer SB, Shogren K, et al. Establishing a causal relationship between intervention to promote self-determination and enhanced student self-determination. J Special Educ 2013;46:195–210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfensberger W. Social role valorization: a proposed new term for the principle of normalization. Intellect Develop Disabil 2011;49:435–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behn N, Togher L, Power E, et al. Evaluating a communication training for paid carers of people with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2012;26:1702–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman MD, Perlick DA, Straits-Troster K. Adapting the multifamily group model for treating veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychologic Serv 2012;9:349–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collinger JL, Boninger ML, Bruns TM, et al. Functional priorities, assistive technology, and brain-computer interfaces after spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Res Develop 2013;50:145–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helgeson MD, Genderlberg D, Sidhu GS, et al. Management of cervical spinal trauma: can a prognostic classification of injury determine clinical outcome? Orthopedic Clin N Am 2012;43:89–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim DG, Lee BS, Kim DA, et al. The selection of the appropriate computer interface device for patients with high cervical cord injury. Ann Rehabil Med 2013;37:443–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MacBean N, Ward E, Murdoch B, et al. Phonation after cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI): prospective case examinations of the acute and sub-acute stages of recovery. Intern J Speech-Language Pathol 2013;15:312–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGoldrick NP, Green C, Buske N, et al. Acute traumatic spinal injury following bicycle accidents: a report of three cases. Acta Orthopedic Belgic 2012;78:409–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozeboom N, Parenteau K, Carraturo D. Rehabilitation starts in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Nurs Quart 2012;35:234–40
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Velstra IM, Bolliger M, Baumberger M, et al. Epicritic sensation in cervical spinal cord injury: diagnostic gains beyond testing light touch. J Neurotrauma 2013;30:1342–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni G, O’Reilly M, Singh N, et al. Technology-assisted messaging opportunities for two persons emerged from a minimally conscious state and showing extensive motor disabilities. Develop Neurorehabil 2011;14:8–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, O’Reilly MF, Singh NN, et al. Communication opportunities via special messaging technology for two post-coma persons with multiple disabilities. Res Develop Disabil 2011;32:1703–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, et al. Technology-aided recreation and communication opportunities for post-coma persons affected by lack of speech and extensive motor impairment. Res Develop Disabil 2013;34:2959–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, et al. Post-coma persons emerged from a minimally conscious state and showing multiple disabilities learn to manage a radio-listening activity. Res Develop Disabil 2012;33:670–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, et al. Technology-assisted programmes to promote leisure engagement in persons with acquired brain injury and profound multiple disabilities: two case studies. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2011;6:412–19
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plach HL, Sells CH. Occupational performance needs of young veterans. Am J Occupat Ther 2013;67:73–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghavendra P, Newman L, Grace E, et al. ‘I could never do that before’: effectiveness of a tailored internet support intervention to increase the social participation of youth with disabilities. Child Care Health Develop 2013;39:552–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman D, Fager S, Ball L, et al. AAC for adults with acquired neurological conditions: a review. Augment Alternat Commun 2008;24:255–67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casey KS. Creating an assistive technology clinic: the experience of the Johns Hopkins AT Clinic for patients with ALS. NeuroRehabilitation 2011;28:281–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis M, Lou JS. Management of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) by the family nurse practitioner: a timeline for anticipated referrals. J Am Acad Nurse Practitioners 2011;23:464–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Carvalho M, Swash M. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: an update. Curr Opin Neurol 2011;24:497–503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruis KL, Wren PA, Huggins JE. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients’ self-reported satisfaction with assistive technology. Muscle Nerve 2011;43:643–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, et al. Technology-aided programs for assisting communication and leisure engagement of persons with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: two single-case studies. Res Develop Disabil 2012;33:1605–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow DH, Nock M, Hersen M. Single-case experimental designs: strategies for studying behavior change. 3rd ed. New York: Allyn & Bacon; 2009
   Google Scholar
• Kazdin AE. Behavior modification in applied settings. 6th ed. New York: Wadsworth; 2001
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy C. Single case designs for educational research. New York: Allyn & Bacon; 2005
   Google Scholar
• Hagen C. Levels of cognitive functioning. Rehabilitation of the head injured adult: comprehensive physical management. 3rd ed. Dowey (CA): Professional Staff Association of the Rancho Los Amigos Hospital, Inc.; 1998
   Google Scholar
• McDougall J, Evans J, Baldwin P. The importance of self-determination to perceived quality of life for youth and young adults with chronic conditions and disabilities. Remedial Special Educ 2010;31:252–60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rispoli MJ, Machalicek W, Lang R. Communication interventions for individuals with acquired brain injury. Develop Neurorehabil 2010;13:141–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseaux M, Vérigneaux C, Kozlowski O. An analysis of communication in conversation after severe traumatic brain injury. Eur J Neurol 2010;17:922–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O’Reilly FM, et al. Post-coma persons emerging from a minimally conscious state with multiple disabilities make technology-aided phone contacts with relevant partners. Res Develop Disabil 2013;34:3190–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posatskiy AO, Chau T. Design and evaluation of a novel microphone-based mechanomyography sensor with cylindrical and conical acoustic chambers. Med Eng Phys 2012;34:1184–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shih CH, Wang SH, Chang ML, et al. Assisting patients with disabilities to actively perform occupational activities using battery-free wireless mice to control environmental stimulation. Res Develop Disabil 2012;33:2221–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbard Winkler SL, Vogel B, Hoenig H, et al. Cost, utilization, and policy of provision of assistive technology devices to veterans poststroke by Medicare and VA. Med Care 2010;48:558–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Israena P, Dubsok P, Pan-Ngum S. A study of low-cost, robust Assistive Listening System (ALS) based on digital wireless technology. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2008;3:295–301
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wallace J. Assistive technology funding in the United States. NeuroRehabilitation 2011;28:295–302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callahan K, Henson R, Cowan AK. Social validation of evidence-based practices in autism by parents, teachers, and administrators. J Autism Develop Disorders 2008;38:678–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, O’Reilly MF, Singh NN, et al. A social validation assessment of microswitch-based programs for persons with multiple disabilities employing teacher trainees and parents as raters. J Develop Phys Disabil 2006;18:383–91
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripat J, Woodgate R. The intersection of culture, disability and assistive technology. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2011;6:87–96
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scherer MJ, Craddock G, Mackeogh T. The relationship of personal factors and subjective well-being to the use of assistive technology devices. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:811–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher L, Power E, Rietdijk R, et al. An exploration of participant experience of a communication training program for people with traumatic brain injury and their communication partners. Disabil Rehabil 2012;34:1562–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar