Living with a powered wheelchair: exploring children’s and young people’s experiences

References

• Nisbet PD. Assessment and training of children for powered mobility in the UK. Technol Disabil 2002;14:173–82
   Google Scholar
• McConachie H, Colver AF, Forsyth RJ, et al. Participation of disabled children: how should it be characterised and measured? Disabil Rehabil 2006;28:115–64
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simeonsson RJ, Carlsonoe D, Huntington GS, et al. Students with disabilities: a national survey of participation in school activities. Disabil Rehabil 2001;23:49–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson N, Shakespeare T, Cunningham-Burley S, Barnes C. Life as a disabled child: a qualitative study of young peoples experiences and perspectives. Edinburgh (UK): University of Edinburgh; 2000
   Google Scholar
• Wiart L, Darrah J. Changing philosophical perspectives on the management of children with physical disabilities – their effect on the use of powered mobility. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:492–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler C. Effects of powered mobility on self-initiated behaviours of very young children with locomotor disability. Dev Med Child Neurol 1986;28:325–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furumasu J, Guerette P, Tefft D. The development of a powered wheelchair mobility program for young children. Technol Disabil 1996;5:41–8
   Google Scholar
• Hansen L. Evidence and outcomes for power mobility intervention with young children. Casemaker 2008;4:1–5
   Google Scholar
• Home AM, Ham R. Provision of powered mobility equipment to young children: the Whizz-Kidz experience. Int J Thera Rehabil 2003;10:511–17
   Google Scholar
• Jones MA, McEwan IR, Hansen L. Use of power mobility for a young child with spinal muscular atrophy. Physical Therapy 2003;83:253–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connors C, Stalker K. Children’s experiences of disability: pointers to a social model of childhood disability. Disabil Soc 2007;22:19–33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank AO, Neophytou C, Frank J, De Souza L. Electric-powered indoor/outdoor wheelchairs (EPIOCs): users’ views of influence on family, friends and carers. Disabil Rehabil: Assist Technol 2010;5:327–38
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wiart L, Darrah J, Hollis V, et al. Mothers’ perceptions of their children’s use of powered mobility. Phys Occupat Therap Pediatr 2004;24:3–21
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berry E, McLaurin SE, Sparling J. Parent/caregiver perspectives on the use of power wheelchairs. Pediatric Phys Thera 1996;8:146–50
   Google Scholar
• Evans S, Neophytou C, De Souza L, Frank A. Young people’s experiences using electric powered indoor-outdoor wheelchairs (EPIOCs): potential for enhancing users’ development? Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:1281–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox D. Young persons’ mobility project; project report (unpublished). Lancaster (UK): St Martin's College; 2001
   Google Scholar
• Wiart L, Darrah J, Cook A, et al. Evaluation of powered mobility use in home and community environments. Phys Occupat Therap Pediatr 2003;23:59–75
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Evans S, Frank A, Neophytou C, De Souza L. Older adults’ use of and satisfaction with electric powered indoor-outdoor wheelchairs (EPIOCs). Age Aging 2007;36:431–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottos M, Bolcati C, Sciuto L, et al. Powered wheelchairs and independence in young children with tetraplegia. Dev Med Child Neurol 2001;43:769–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casey J, Paleg G, Livingstone R. Facilitating child participation through power mobility. Br J Occupat Therap 2013;76:158–60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronin-Davis J, Butler A, Mayers CA. Occupational therapy and interpretative phenomenological analysis: comparable research companions? Br J Occupat Therap 2009;72:332–8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pringle J, Drummond J, McLafferty E, Hendry C. Interpretative phenomenological analysis: a discussion and critique. Nurse Res 2011;18:20–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith JA, Osborn M. Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In: Smith JA, ed. Qualitative psychology: a practical guide to research methods, 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2008:53–80
   Google Scholar
• Chapman E, Parameshwar J, Jenkins D, et al. Psychological issues for patients with ventricular assist devices: a qualitative pilot study. Am J Crit Care 2007;16:72–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray CD. Being like everybody else: the personal meanings of being a prosthesis user. Disabil Rehabil 2009;31:573–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petalas MA, Hastings RP, Nash S, et al. “I like that he always shows who he is”: the perceptions and experiences of siblings with a brother with autism spectrum disorder. Int J Disabil Dev Educ 2009;56:381–99
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise BV. In their own words: the lived experience of pediatric liver transplantation. Qualit Health Res 2002;12:74–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connors C, Stalker K. Children’s experiences of disability: pointers to a social model of childhood disability. Disabil Soc 2007;22:19–33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen P, James A. Researching children and childhood cultures of communication. In: Christensen P, James A, eds. Research with children: perspectives and practices, 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 2008:1–9
   Google Scholar
• Docherty S, Sandelowski M. Focus on qualitative methods: interviewing children. Res Nurs Health 1999;27:177–85
   Google Scholar
• Hood S, Kelley P, Mayall B. Children as research subjects: a risky enterprise. Child Soc 1996;10:117–28
   Google Scholar
• Irwin LG, Johnson J. Interviewing young children: explicating our practices and dilemmas. Qualit Health Res 2005;15:821–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starks H, Brown Trinidad S. Choose your method: a comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis and grounded theory. Qualitat Health Res 2007;17:1372–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith J, Flowers P, Larkin M. Interpretative phenomenological analysis. London: Sage; 2009
   Google Scholar
• Taylor MC. Interviewing. In: Holloway I, ed. Qualitative research in health care. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2005:39–53
   Google Scholar
• Lewis A, Porter J. Interviewing children and young people with learning disabilities: guidelines for researchers and multi-professional practice. Br J Learn Disabil 2004;32:191–7
   Google Scholar
• Morris J. Including all children: finding out about the experiences of children with communication and/or cognitive impairments. Child Soc 2003;17:337–48
   Google Scholar
• NCB. (2009). NCB guidelines for research with children and young people [pdf document]; 2009. Available from: http://www.ncb.org.uk/PDF/Guidelines%20for%20research%20Oct%202009.pdf [last accessed 17 Sept 2010]
   Google Scholar
• Morison M, Moir J, Kwansa T. Interviewing children for the purposes of research in primary care. Prim Health Care Res Dev 2000;1:113–30
   Google Scholar
• Punch S. Research with children: the same or different from research with adults? Childhood 2002;9:321–41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter B. How do you analysis qualitative data? In: Lavender T, Edwards G, Alfirevic Z, eds. Demystifying qualitative research in pregnancy and childbirth. Trowbridge: MA Healthcare; 2004:87–108
   Google Scholar
• Whyte J. [Internet]. Research with children with disabilities: guidelines and checklist for good practice. Dublin: Children’s Research Centre; no date; Available from: http://www.nda.ie/cntmgmtnew.nsf/0/851DE72FE32677F0802571CB005A165B/$File/ResearchwithChildrenwithDisabilities.pdf [last accessed 10 Aug 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Mays N, Pope C. Qualitative research: rigour and qualitative research. Br Med J 1995;311:109–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies D, Dodd J. Qualitative research and the question of rigor. Qualitat Health Res 2002;12:279–89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk S. How children and young people construct and negotiate living with medical technology. Soc Sci Med 2010;71:1796–803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripat JD, Woodgate RL. Locating assistive technology within an emancipatory disability research framework. Technol Disabil 2011;23:87–92
   Google Scholar
• May M, Rugg S. Electrically powered indoor/outdoor wheelchairs: recipients’ views of their effects on occupational performance and quality of life. Br J Occupat Therap 2010;73:2–12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toombs SK. The lived experiences of disability. Human Stud 1995;18:9–23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen C. On the ‘physiological dope’ problematic in housing and illness research: towards a critical realism of home and health. Housing, Theory Soc 2000;17:49–67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes B, Paterson K. The social model of disability and the disappearing body: towards a sociology of impairment. Disabil Soc 1997;12:325–40
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakespeare T, Watson N. The social model of disability; an outdated ideology? Res Soc Sci Disabil 2002;2:9–28
   Google Scholar
• Murray CD. The social meanings of prosthesis use. J Health Psycol 2005;10:425–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winance M. Trying out the wheelchair: the mutual shaping of people and devices through adjustment. Sci, Technol Human Values 2006;31:52–72
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrahamsson S, Simpson P. The limits of the body: boundaries, capacities, thresholds. Soc Cult Geogr 2011;12:331–8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pepperell R. The post human condition, 2nd ed. Exeter: Intellect Books; 1997
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans S, Berg M. The practice of medical technology. Soc Health Illness 2003;25:97–114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloper P, Rabiee P, Beresford B. Every child matters outcomes: what do they mean for disabled children and young people? Child Soc 2009;23:265–78
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews H, Limb M. Defining an agenda for the geography of children: review and prospect. Progr Human Geogr 1999;23:61–90
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HMSO. [Internet]. Disability and discrimination act. London: HMSO; 1995; Available from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1995/50/contents [last accessed 1 Sept 2011]
   Google Scholar
• HMSO. Equality act. London: HMSO; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Hemmingsson H, Jonsson H. An occupational perspective on the concept of participation in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health – some critical remarks. Am J Occupat Therap 2005;59:569–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durkin J. Discovering powered mobility skills with children: ‘responsive partners’ in learning. Int J Thera Rehabil 2009;16:331–41
   Google Scholar
• Millward Brown Ulster. ‘Watch your toes mummy!’: the potential of powered mobility for children under 5 in Northern Ireland. Belfast (UK): Millward Brown Ulster; 2008
   Google Scholar
• Hunter J, Csikszentmihalyi M. The phenomenology of body-mind: the contrasting cases of flow in sports and contemplation. Anthropol Consciousness 2000;11:5–24
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty M. Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge; 1962
   Google Scholar
• Crow L. Including all of our lives: renewing the social model of disability. In: Rix J, Nind M, Sheehy, K, Simmons K, Walsh C, eds. Equality, participation and inclusion 1: diverse perspectives. Abingdon (UK): Routledge; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Thoma AG. Immune system impairment in response to chronic anxiety. Integr Med: Clinician's J 2011;10:1:20–4
   Google Scholar
• Forsyth R, Jarvis S. Participation in childhood. Child: Care, Health Dev 2002;28:277–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imrie R, Edwards C. The geographies of disability: reflections on the development of a sub-discipline. Geogr Compass 2007;1/3:623–40
   Google Scholar
• Gibson BE, Upshur REG, Young NL, McKeever P. Disability, technology, and place: social and ethical implications of long-term dependency on medical devices. Ethics Place Environ 2007;10:7–28
   Google Scholar