Everyday use of assistive technology devices in school settings

References

• Oskoui M, Coutinho F, Dykeman J, et al. An update on the prevalence of cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dev Med Child Neurol 2013;55:509–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Østensjø S, Brogren E, Vøllestad, N. Everyday functioning in young children with cerebral palsy: functional skills, caregiver assistance, and modifications of the environment. Dev Med Child Neurol 2003;45:603–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Østensjø S, Carlberg EB, Vøllestad N. The use and impact of assistive devices and other environmental modifications on everyday activities and care in young children with cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:849–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolson A, Moir L, Millsteed J. Impact of assistive technology on family caregivers of children with physical disabilities: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2012;7:345–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Montero SM, Gómez-Conesa A. Technical devices in children with motor disabilities: a review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2014;9:3–11
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oslo Universitetssykehus. CPOP Cerebral Parese Oppfølgingsprogram. Oslo: Oslo Universitetssykehus; 2013
   Google Scholar
• Huang IC, Sugden D, Beveridge S. Assistive devices and cerebral palsy: the use of assistive devices at school by children with cerebral palsy. Child Care Health Dev 2009;35:698–708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang IC, Sugden D, Beveridge S. Assistive devices and cerebral palsy: factors influencing the use of assistive devices at home by children with cerebral palsy. Child Care Health Dev 2009;35:130–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang IC, Sugden D, Beveridge S. Children's perceptions of their use of assistive devices in home and school settings. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2009;4:95–105
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rogoff B, ed. The cultural nature of human development. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003
   Google Scholar
• Ulvik OS.Talking with children: professional conversations in a participation perspective. Qual Soc Work 2014;1–16. [Epub ahead of print]. doi:10.1177/1473325014526923
   Google Scholar
• Dunst CJ, Bruder MB, Trivette CM, Hamby DW. Young children's natural learning environments: contrasting approaches to early childhood intervention indicate differential learning opportunities. Psychol Rep 2005;96:231–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunst CJ, Trivette CM, Humpbries T, et al. Contrasting approaches to natural learning environment interventions. Inf Young Child 2001;14:48–63
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau-Harrison K, Rochette A. Impacts of wheelchair acquisition on children from a person-occupation-environment interactional perspective. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2013;8:1–10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ripat J, Woodgate R. The intersection of culture, disability and assistive technology. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2011;6:87–96
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Soderstrom S, Ytterhus B. The use and non-use of assistive technologies from the world of information and communication technology by visually impaired young people: a walk on the tightrope of peer inclusion. Disabil Soc 2010;25:303–15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupton D, Seymour W. Technology, selfhood and physical disability. Soc Sci Med 2000;50:1851–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderson P. Young children's rights: exploring beliefs, principles and practice. London: Jessica Kingsley; 2008
   Google Scholar
• Thomas N, O'Kane C. The ethics of participatory research with children. Child Soc 1998;12:336–48
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. The United Nations convention on the rights of the child: United Nations; 1989
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum P, Paneth N, Leviton A, et al. A report: the definition and classification of cerebral palsy April 2006. Dev Med Child Neurol Suppl 2007;109:8–14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tudge T, Hogan D. An ecological approach to observations of children`s everyday life. In: Greene S, Hogan D, eds. Researching children’s experience: methods and approaches. London: Sage; 2005
   Google Scholar
• Tjora A. Kvalitative forskningsmetoder i praksis. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Clark A. Multimodal map making with young children: exploring ethnographic and participatory methods. Qual Res 2011;11:311–30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andenæs A. From ‘placement’ to ‘a child on the move’: methodological strategies to give children a more central position in Child Welfare Service. Qual Soc Work 2012;11:486–501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haavind H. Liten og stor. Mødres omsorg og barns utviklingsmuligheter. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget; 1987
   Google Scholar
• Asbjørnslett M, Engelsrud GH, Helseth S. Inclusion and participation in everyday school life: experiences of children with physical (dis)abilities. Int J Incl Educ 2014;19:1–14
   Google Scholar
• Asbjornslett M, Engelsrud GH, Helseth S. “Friendship in All Directions”: Norwegian children with physical disabilities experiencing friendship. Childh Glob J Child Res 2012;19:481–94
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekken W. ‘I want them to see that I feel normal’: three children’s experiences from attending consultations in paediatric rehabilitation. Disabil Soc 2014; 29:778–91
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson BE, Carnevale FA, King G. “This is my way”: reimagining disability, in/dependence and interconnectedness of persons and assistive technologies. Disabil Rehabilitation 2012;34:1894–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar