Problems, Policies and Politics: making the case for better assistive technology provision in Australia

References

• Cook A, Hussey S, eds. Assistive technologies: principles and practice. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier; 2008
   Google Scholar
• Productivity Commission. Disability care and support. Report no. 54, Canberra; 2011. Available from: http://www.pc.gov.au/projects/inquiry/disability-support/report [last accessed 1 Jan 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Pate A, Horn M. Aids and equipment for Victorians with disabilities – entitlement or hand-out? A Position Paper – Recommendations for an effective Victorian Aids & equipment program for the 21st century. Research and Social Policy Unit: Melbourne Citymission; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Wilson E, Wong J, Goodridge J. Too little too late: Wait times and cost burden for people with a disability in seeking equipment funding in Victoria. Melbourne: Scope Victoria; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Layton N, Wilson E, Colgan S, et al. The equipping inclusion studies: assistive technology use and outcomes in Victoria. Melbourne: Deakin University; 2010
   Google Scholar
• National people with disabilities and carers council. Shut Out: the experience of people with disabilities and their families in Australia – National Disability Strategy Consultation Report. Canberra: Commonwealth Government; 2009
   Google Scholar
• Banks G. Challenges of evidence-based policy-making. Canberra: Productivity Commission; 2009
   Google Scholar
• Campbell S, Benita S, Coates E, et al. Analysis for policy: evidence-based policy in practice. London: UK Government Social Research Unit; 2007
   Google Scholar
• Löfgren H, de Leeuw E, Leahy M, eds. Democratizing Health: consumer groups in the policy process. Australia: Deakin University; 2011
   Google Scholar
• Thurber JA. Foreward. Agendas, alternatives and public policies. New York: Longman Classics in Political Science; 2003
   Google Scholar
• Breton E, De Leeuw E. Theories of the policy process in health promotion research: a review. Health Promot Int 2010;26:82–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingdon J. Agendas, alternatives and public policies. 2nd ed. New York: Longman Classics in Political Science; 2003
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon J. Congressmen's voting decisions. 3rd ed. Michigan, USA: University of Michigan Press; 1989
   Google Scholar
• Goggin G, Newell C, eds. Disability in Australia: exposing a social apartheid. Sydney: University of NSW Press; 2005
   Google Scholar
• Goble C. Dependence, independence and normality. In: Swain J, French S, Barnes C, Thomas, C, eds. Disabling Barriers – Enabling Environments. UK: Sage Publications; 2004:41–3
   Google Scholar
• WHO. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2001
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare T. Disability rights and wrongs. New York: Routledge; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare T. Disability: suffering, social oppression or complex predicament? In: Rehmann-Sutter D, Mieth D, eds. The contingent nature of life: bioethics and limits of human existence. Netherlands: Springer; 2008:235–46
   Google Scholar
• Thomas C. How is disability understood? An examination of sociological approaches. Disabil Soc 2004;19:569–83
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas C. Sociologies of disability and illness: contested ideas in disability studies and medical sociology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2007
   Google Scholar
• Layton N, Wilson E. Re-conceptualizing disability and assistive technology: Australian consumers driving policy change. Technol Disabil 2009;21:135–41
   Google Scholar
• Smith R, Benge M. Using assistive technology to enable better living. In: Christiansen C, Matuska K, eds. Ways of living: adaptive strategies for special needs. 3rd ed. Bethesda: AOTA Press; 2004:397–421
   Google Scholar
• AT Collaboration. Assistive Technology-Economics Collaboration; 2009. Available from: www.at.org.au [last accessed 1 Jan 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. ICF Australian User Guide Version 1.0. Canberra: AIHW; 2003
   Google Scholar
• Madden R, Glozier N, Llewellyn G, et al. UN Convention: Australian perspectives. BMC Public Health, 11, Supplement 4. Proceedings of What is Disability? UN Convention on the rights of persons with disability, eligibility criteria and the international classification of functioning disability and health; 2011
   Google Scholar
• Fouarge D. Costs of non-social policy: towards an economic framework of quality social policies – and the costs of not having them: European Commission. Report for the employment and social affairs director general; 2003
   Google Scholar
• Schraner I, Bolzan N. Inclusion – What does it cost and how do we measure this? In: Emiliani P, Burzagli L, Como A, Gabbanini F, Salminen A, eds. Assistive technology from adapted equipment to inclusive environments. Amsterdam: IOC; 2009:777–82
   Google Scholar
• Schraner I, De Jonge D. Economics of Inclusiveness – Can we as a society afford not to provide assistive technology and not to use universal design? In: Steinfeld E, Maisel J, eds. The State of the Science: Emerging Research and Developments in Universal Design. New York: Bentham Sciences; 2010:132–43
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities and optional protocol. Geneva: United Nations; 2006
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. Monitoring the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Guidance for human rights monitors. New York and Geneva: Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Rioux M, Basser L, Jones M, eds. Critical perspectives on human rights and disability law. Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 2011
   Google Scholar
• Oliver T. The politics of public health policy. Annu Rev Publ Health 2006;27:195–233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Disability Investment Group. The Way Forward – A New Disability Policy Framework for Australia. Canberra: FaHCSIA; 2009
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Primary Care. Victorian spinal cord injury community integration project. Melbourne: La Trobe University Australian Institute for Primary Care; 2007
   Google Scholar
• Andrich R. The SCAI instrument: measuring costs of individual assistive technology programmes. Technol Disabil 2002;14:95–99
   Google Scholar
• Summers M. Ripe for reform: aids and equipment policy. Health Issues: Journal of the Health Issues Centre. Bundoora: LaTrobe University; 2011:32–4
   Google Scholar
• Social Inclusion Unit. The Australian public service policy design and delivery toolkit. Canberra: Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet; 2009
   Google Scholar
• NAERA. National Aids and equipment reform alliance foundation document. Melbourne; 2011
   Google Scholar
• Ottmann G, Laragy C. Developing consumer-directed care for people with a disability: 10 lessons for user participation in health and community care policy and program development. Australian Health Review 2010;34:390–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aids and Equipment Action Alliance (AEAA). Melbourne, Australia; 2006. Available from www.aeaa.org.au [last accessed 1 Jan 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Every Australian Counts. (n.d) Every Australian Counts. Available from: http://everyaustraliancounts.com.au/ [last accessed 1 Jan 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Australian Social Inclusion Board. Social Inclusion in Australia - How Australia is faring. Canberra: Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet; 2010
   Google Scholar
• NDIS. National Disability Insurance Scheme. Available from: www.ndis.gov.au [last accessed 1 Jan 2014]
   Google Scholar
• De Jonge D, Layton N. Assistive Technology in Australia: what we need, what gets funded and what can we do about it? Paper presented at the ARATA Conference, Adelaide. September 2008; South Australia
   Google Scholar
• ATSA. Assistive Technology Suppliers Australasia Code of Practice. Available from: http://www.atsa.org.au/ [last accessed 1 Jan 2014]
   Google Scholar
• ARATA. Australian Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology Association (n.d.). Available from: www.arata.org.au [last accessed 1 Jan 2014]
   Google Scholar